Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lagrangian Approaches of Dirac and Feynman to Quantum Mechanics

Yong Gwan Yi

Published May 17, 2000• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

A unified exposition of the Lagrangian approach to quantum mechanics is presented, embodying the main features of the approaches of Dirac and of Feynman. The arguments of the exposition address the relation of the Lagrangian approach to the Hamiltonian operator and how the correspondence principle fits into each context. 1

Related papers

Dirac and the Path Integral

N. D. Hari Dass

Through a very careful analysis of Dirac's 1932 paper on the Lagrangian in Quantum Mechanics as well as the second and third editions of his classic book {\it The Principles of Quantum Mechanics}, I show that Dirac's contributions to the birth of the path-integral approach to quantum mechanics is not restricted to just his seminal demonstration of how Lagrangians appear naturally in quantum mechanics, but that Dirac should be credited for creating a path-integral which I call {\it Dirac path-integral} which is far more general than Feynman's while possessing all its desirable features. On top of it, the Dirac path-integral is fully compatible with the inevitable quantisation ambiguities, while the Feynman path-integral can never have that full consistency. In particular, I show that the claim by Feynman that for infinitesimal time intervals, what Dirac thought were analogues were actually proportional can not be correct always. I have also shown the conection between Dirac path-integrals and the Schrödinger equation. In particular, it is shown that each choice of Dirac path-integral yields a {\it quantum Hamiltonian} that is generically different from what the Feynman path-integral gives, and that all of them have the same {\it classical analogue}. Dirac's method of demonstrating the least action principle for classical mechanics generalizes in a most straightforward way to all the generalized path-integrals.

arXiv:2003.12683•Mar 28, 2020•0 citations

A derivation of the Schrödinger equation from Feynman’s path-integral formulation of quantum mechanics

Tal Hendel

Abstract The equation of motion in the standard formulation of non-relativistic quantum mechanics, the Schrödinger equation, is based on the Hamiltonian. In contrast, in Feynman’s path-integral formulation of quantum mechanics, the equation of motion is the propagation equation, which is based on the Lagrangian. That these two different equations of motion are equivalent was shown by Feynman, who provided a derivation of the Schrödinger equation from the propagation equation. Surprisingly, however, while in classical mechanics there exists a simple relationship between the Hamiltonian and the Lagrangian, there is nothing in Feynman’s derivation that gives any indication of this relationship. Here I show that the equations of motion in the Hamiltonian and Lagrangian formulations of quantum mechanics are, in fact, simply related to each other.

European Journal of Physics•Aug 7, 2024•1 citation

On Lagrangian Formalism

K. Nishijima

The differences between Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalisms are discussed through the concept of chronological ordering operators thereby keeping close correspondence to Feynman's path integral. Next a method to derive commutation relations without referring to Hamiltonian formalism is presented.

Progress of Theoretical Physics•Oct 1, 1952•1 citation

Feynman's path to Schrödinger (and various other things)

Bernat Frangi, López, Héctor

Feynman's path integral formulation arose from his attempt to incorporate the Lagrangian framework into quantum mechanics, offering what he regarded as a more fundamental perspective than the Hamiltonian approach, particularly in the context of quantum electrodynamics. Inspired by an analogy proposed by P. A. M. Dirac, Feynman showed that Schrödinger's equation could be recovered by promoting this analogy to an equality, up to a constant factor. This insight laid the foundation for the path integral formalism. In this article, we first outline the historical development of dynamical frameworks in physics and then trace Feynman's reasoning as he constructed his formulation, beginning with the double-slit experiment and its interpretation. We subsequently derive the Schrödinger equation from the path integral and demonstrate the conservation of probability. These final sections aim to provide students with a clear link between this elegant yet less commonly presented approach and the more standard methods typically taught in undergraduate courses.

arXiv:2509.17108•Sep 21, 2025•0 citations

Lagrangian Approach to Quantum Mechanics

Yong Gwan Yi

The Lagrangian approach of Dirac is presented in a complete form. This suggests to identify the Schrödinger equation as the Euler-Lagrange equation rather than the Hamiltonian operator equation.

arXiv:physics/0005044•May 17, 2000•1 citation

- Quantum Mechanics Using Lagrangians: Path Integrals

Girish S. Setlur

Quantum mechanics, as it is taught in various undergraduate courses, typically focuses on developing the formalism using the phase space or the Hamiltonian description of classical mechanics. This gives an impression to the student that Lagrangians cannot be used to develop a formalism of quantum mechanics. Of course, this is not true. Dirac is credited with originating the idea of the path integral in physics. However, it was Feynman who popularized this idea and made it widely accessible to physicists.

CRC Press eBooks•Dec 5, 2013•0 citations
Through a very careful analysis of Dirac's 1932 paper on the Lagrangian in Quantum Mechanics as well as the second and third editions of his classic book {\it The Principles of Quantum Mechanics}, I show that Dirac's contributions to the birth of the path-integral approach to quantum mechanics is not restricted to just his seminal demonstration of how Lagrangians appear naturally in quantum mechanics, but that Dirac should be credited for creating a path-integral which I call {\it Dirac path-integral} which is far more general than Feynman's while possessing all its desirable features. On top of it, the Dirac path-integral is fully compatible with the inevitable quantisation ambiguities, while the Feynman path-integral can never have that full consistency. In particular, I show that the claim by Feynman that for infinitesimal time intervals, what Dirac thought were analogues were actually proportional can not be correct always. I have also shown the conection between Dirac path-integrals and the Schrödinger equation. In particular, it is shown that each choice of Dirac path-integral yields a {\it quantum Hamiltonian} that is generically different from what the Feynman path-integral gives, and that all of them have the same {\it classical analogue}. Dirac's method of demonstrating the least action principle for classical mechanics generalizes in a most straightforward way to all the generalized path-integrals.
Abstract The equation of motion in the standard formulation of non-relativistic quantum mechanics, the Schrödinger equation, is based on the Hamiltonian. In contrast, in Feynman’s path-integral formulation of quantum mechanics, the equation of motion is the propagation equation, which is based on the Lagrangian. That these two different equations of motion are equivalent was shown by Feynman, who provided a derivation of the Schrödinger equation from the propagation equation. Surprisingly, however, while in classical mechanics there exists a simple relationship between the Hamiltonian and the Lagrangian, there is nothing in Feynman’s derivation that gives any indication of this relationship. Here I show that the equations of motion in the Hamiltonian and Lagrangian formulations of quantum mechanics are, in fact, simply related to each other.
Feynman's path integral formulation arose from his attempt to incorporate the Lagrangian framework into quantum mechanics, offering what he regarded as a more fundamental perspective than the Hamiltonian approach, particularly in the context of quantum electrodynamics. Inspired by an analogy proposed by P. A. M. Dirac, Feynman showed that Schrödinger's equation could be recovered by promoting this analogy to an equality, up to a constant factor. This insight laid the foundation for the path integral formalism. In this article, we first outline the historical development of dynamical frameworks in physics and then trace Feynman's reasoning as he constructed his formulation, beginning with the double-slit experiment and its interpretation. We subsequently derive the Schrödinger equation from the path integral and demonstrate the conservation of probability. These final sections aim to provide students with a clear link between this elegant yet less commonly presented approach and the more standard methods typically taught in undergraduate courses.
Quantum mechanics, as it is taught in various undergraduate courses, typically focuses on developing the formalism using the phase space or the Hamiltonian description of classical mechanics. This gives an impression to the student that Lagrangians cannot be used to develop a formalism of quantum mechanics. Of course, this is not true. Dirac is credited with originating the idea of the path integral in physics. However, it was Feynman who popularized this idea and made it widely accessible to physicists.