Various versions of noncommutative probability theory are surveyed. It is stressed that the main motivation and applications of these noncommutative theories is quantum mechanics. A review of traditional probability theory and its unsharp version are presented. Sharp and unsharp Hilbert space probability theories are considered next. We then present a general discussion of observables and statistical maps. Finally, we consider sequential effect algebras and show that they unify and generalize all of these types of probability theories.
Various versions of noncommutative probability theory are surveyed. It is stressed that the main motivation and applications of these noncommutative theories is quantum mechanics. A review of traditional probability theory and its unsharp version are presented. Sharp and unsharp Hilbert space probability theories are considered next. We then present a general discussion of observables and statistical maps. Finally, we consider sequential effect algebras and show that they unify and generalize all of these types of probability theories.
The paper can be regarded as a short and informal introduction to noncommutative calculi of probability. The standard theory of probability is reformulated in the algebraic language. In this form it is readily generalized to that its version which is virtually present in quantum mechanics, and then generalized to the so-called free theory of probability. Noncommutative theory of probability is a pair (M, φ) where M is a von Neumann algebra, and φ a normal state on M which plays the role of a noncommutative probability measure. In the standard (commutative) theory of probability, there is, in principle, one mathematically interesting probability measure, namely the Lebesgue measure, whereas in the noncommutative theories there are many nonequivalent probability measures. Philosophical implications of this fact are briefly discussed.
The mathematics of classical probability theory was subsumed into classical measure theory by Kolmogorov in 1933.Quantum theory as nonclassical probability theory was incorporated into the beginnings of noncommutative measure theory by von Neumann in the early thirties, as well.To precisely this end, von Neumann initiated the study of what are now called von Neumann algebras and, with Murray, made a first classification of such algebras into three types.The nonrelativistic quantum theory of systems with finitely many degrees of freedom deals exclusively with type I algebras.However, for the description of further quantum systems, the other types of von Neumann algebras are indispensable.The paper reviews quantum probability theory in terms of general von Neumann algebras, stressing the similarity of the conceptual structure of classical and noncommutative probability theories and emphasizing the correspondence between the classical and quantum concepts, though also indicating the nonclassical nature of quantum probabilistic predictions.In addition, differences between the probability theories in the type I, II and III settings are explained.A brief description is given of quantum systems for which probability theory based on type I algebras is known to be insufficient.These illustrate the physical significance of the previously mentioned differences.
The paper can be regarded as a short and informal introduction to noncommutative calculi of probability. The standard theory of probability is reformulated in the algebraic language. In this form it is readily generalized to that its version which is virtually present in quantum mechanics, and then generalized to the so-called free theory of probability. Noncommutative theory of probability is a pair (M, φ) where M is a von Neumann algebra, and φ a normal state on M which plays the role of a noncommutative probability measure. In the standard (commutative) theory of probability, there is, in principle, one mathematically interesting probability measure, namely the Lebesgue measure, whereas in the noncommutative theories there are many nonequivalent probability measures. Philosophical implications of this fact are briefly discussed.
We generalize ordinary probability theory to those von Neumann algebras A, for which Dye's generalized version of the Radon-Nikodym theorem holds. This includes the classical case in which A is an Abelian von Neumann algebra generated by an observable or complete set of commuting observables. Via Gleason's theorem, this also includes the case of ordinary quantum mechanics, in which A=B(H) is the von Neumann algebra of all bounded operators on a separable Hilbert space H. Particular consideration is given to the concepts of conditioning, sufficient statistics, coarse-graining, and filtering.
In this sequence of papers, noncommutative analysis is used to give a consistent axiomatic approach to a unified conceptual foundation of classical and quantum physics. The present Part I defines the concepts of observables, states and ensembles, clarifies the logical relations and operations for them, and shows how they give rise to dynamics and probabilities. States are identified with maximal consistent sets of weak equalities in the algebra of observables (instead of, as usual, with the rays in a Hilbert space). This leads to a concise foundation of quantum mechanics, free of undefined terms, separating in a clear way the deterministic and the stochastic features of quantum physics. The traditional postulates of quantum mechanics are derived from well-motivated axiomatic assumptions. No special quantum logic is needed to handle the peculiarities of quantum mechanics. Foundational problems associated with the measurement process, such as the reduction of the state vector, disappear. The new interpretation of quantum mechanics contains `elements of physical reality' without the need to introduce a classical framework with hidden variables. In particular, one may talk about the state of the universe without the need of an external observer and without the need to assume the existence of multiple universes.
Abstract: A suitable unified statistical formulation of quantum and classical mechanics in a ∗-algebraic setting leads us to conclude that information itself is noncommutative in quantum mechanics. Specifically we refer here to an observer’s information regarding a physical system. This is seen as the main difference from classical mechanics, where an observer’s information regarding a physical system obeys classical probability theory. Quantum mechanics is then viewed purely as a mathematical framework for the probabilistic description of noncommutative information, with the projection postulate being a noncommutative generalization of conditional probability. This view clarifies many problems surrounding the interpretation of quantum mechanics, particularly problems relating to the measuring process. 1.