Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Theory of Computing Systems

Time-Optimal Control of Closed Quantum Systems

Robert Huneault

Published Aug 20, 2009• 4 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Recently there has been a lot of interest in the potential applications of performing computations on systems whose governing physical laws are quantum, rather than classical in nature. These quantum computers would have the ability to perform some calculations which would not be feasible for their classical counterparts. To date, however, a quantum computer large enough to perform useful calculations has yet to be built. Before this can be accomplished, a method must be developed to control the underlying quantum systems. This is a problem which can naturally be formulated in the language of control theory. This report outlines the basic control-theoretic approach to time-optimally controlling quantum systems evolving under the dynamics of the Schr\\"{o}dinger operator equation. It is found that under the assumption of non-singularity, the controls which produce time-optimal trajectories are bang-bang. With this in mind, a switching time algorithm is implemented to find optimal bang-bang controls.

Related papers

Time-Optimal Control of Quantum Systems: Numerical Techniques and Singular Trajectories

Tyler Holden

As technological advances allow us to peer into and beyond microscopic phenomena, new theoretical developments are necessary to facilitate this exploration. In particular, the potential afforded by utilizing quantum resources promises to dramatically affect scientific research, communications, computation, and material science. \n \nControl theory is the field dedicated to the manipulation of systems, and quantum control theory pertains to the manoeuvring of quantum systems. Due to the inherent sensitivity of quantum ensembles to their environment, time-optimal solutions should be found in order to minimize exposure to external sources. Furthermore, the complexity of the Schr\\"odinger equation in describing the evolution of a unitary operator makes the analytical discovery of time-optimal solutions rare, motivating the development of numerical algorithms. \n \nThe seminal result of classical control is the Pontryagin Maximum Principle, which implies that a restriction to bounded control amplitudes admits two classifications of trajectories: bang-bang and singular. Extensions of this result to generalized control problems yield the same classification and hence arise in the study of quantum dynamics. While singular trajectories are often avoided in both classical and quantum literature, a full optimal synthesis requires that we analyze the possibility of their existence. \n \nWith this in mind, this treatise will examine the issue of time-optimal quantum control. In particular, we examine the results of existing numerical algorithms, including Gradient Ascent Pulse Engineering and the Kaya-Huneault method. We elaborate on the ideas of the Kaya-Huneault algorithm and present an alternative algorithm that we title the Real-Embedding algorithm. These methods are then compared when used to simulate unitary evolution. \n \nThis is followed by a brief examination on the conditions for the existence of singular controls, as well possible ideas and developments in creating geometry based numerical algorithms.

•Jun 21, 2011•1 citation

Optimal Control for Quantum Optimization of Closed and Open Systems

Lorenzo Campos Venuti, Domenico D’Alessandro, Daniel A. Lidar

Optimization is one of the key applications of quantum computing where a quantum speedup has been an eagerly anticipated outcome. A promising approach to optimization using quantum dynamics is to consider a linear combination $s(t)B+[1\ensuremath{-}s(t)]C$ of two noncommuting Hamiltonians $B$ and $C$, where $C$ encodes the solution to the optimization problem in its ground state, $B$ is a Hamiltonian whose ground state is easy to prepare, and $s(t)\ensuremath{\in}[0,1]$ is the bounded ``switching schedule'' or ``path,'' with $t\ensuremath{\in}[0,{t}_{f}]$. This approach encompasses two of the most widely studied quantum-optimization algorithms: quantum annealing [QA; continuous $s(t)$] and the quantum approximate optimization algorithm [QAOA; piecewise constant $s(t)$]. While it is notoriously difficult to prove a quantum advantage for either algorithm, it is possible to compare and contrast them by finding the optimal $s(t)$. Here we provide a rigorous analysis of this quantum optimal control problem, entirely within the geometric framework of Pontryagin's maximum principle of optimal control theory. We extend earlier results, derived in a purely closed-system setting, to open systems. This is the natural setting for experimental realizations of QA and QAOA. In the closed-system setting it was shown that the optimal solution is a ``bang-anneal-bang'' schedule, with the bangs characterized by $s(t)=0$ and $s(t)=1$ in finite subintervals of $[0,{t}_{f}]$, in particular, $s(0)=0$ and $s({t}_{f})=1$, in contrast to the standard prescription $s(0)=1$ and $s({t}_{f})=0$ of QA. As an example, we prove that for a single spin-$1/2$, the optimal solution in the closed-system setting is the bang-bang schedule, switching midway from $s\ensuremath{\equiv}0$ to $s\ensuremath{\equiv}1$. For finite-dimensional environments and without any approximations we identify sufficient conditions ensuring that either the bang-anneal, anneal-bang, or bang-anneal-bang schedules are optimal, and recover the optimality of $s(0)=0$ and $s({t}_{f})=1$. However, for infinite-dimensional environments and a system described by an adiabatic Redfield master equation we do not recover the bang-type optimal solution. In fact we can only identify conditions under which $s({t}_{f})=1$, and even this result is not recovered in the fully Markovian limit, suggesting that the pure anneal-type schedule is optimal. Our open-system results have implications for the use of experimental quantum-information processors, which are by necessity noisy, and suggest that in this practical sense the optimal schedules for quantum optimization are likely to be continuous.

arXiv:2107.03517•Physical Review Applied•Nov 11, 2021•25 citations

Time-optimal single-scalar control on a qubit of unitary dynamics

Chungwei Lin, Qi Ding, Petros T. Boufounos +4 more

Optimal control theory is applied to analyze the time-optimal solution with a single scalar control knob in a two-level quantum system without quantum decoherence. Emphasis is placed on the dependence on the maximum control strength ${u}_{\text{max}}$. General constraints on the optimal protocol are derived and used to rigorously parametrize the time-optimal solution. Two concrete problems are investigated. For generic state preparation problems, both multiple bang-bang and bang-singular-bang are legitimate and should be considered. Generally, the optimal is bang-bang for small ${u}_{\text{max}}$, and there exists a state-dependent critical amplitude above which singular control emerges. For the X-gate operation of a qubit, the optimal protocol is exclusively multiple bang-bang. The minimum gate time is about 80% of that based on the resonant Rabi $\ensuremath{\pi}$-pulse over a wide range of control strength; in the ${u}_{\text{max}}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$ limit, this ratio is derived to be $\ensuremath{\pi}/4$. To develop practically feasible protocols, we present methods to smooth the abrupt changes in the bang-bang control while preserving perfect gate fidelity. The presence of bang-bang segments in the time-optimal protocol indicates that the high-frequency components and a full calculation (instead of the commonly adopted rotating wave approximation) are essential for the ultimate quantum speed limit.

arXiv:2504.01785•Physical Review A•Apr 2, 2025•2 citations

Control of Quantum Systems: Comparison of Different Techniques by the Example of Charge and Spin Semiconductor Qubits

Xutong Wu, Panagiotis Giounanlis, Robert Bogdan Staszewski +1 more

The semiconducting technologies appear to be an ideal platform to construct quantum systems, inheriting the classical silicon techniques and controllable circuits, and exploiting the quantum nature of confined particles. Meanwhile, quantum optimal control algorithms have been proven to be an efficient tool to assist quantum system manipulation, quantum computing and quantum applications. In this paper, we review some of the main quantum optimal control algorithms in closed quantum systems, and we explore their implementation to charge and spin-based semiconductor qubits. In addition, we propose a bang-bang control algorithm and we examine its performance in selected case studies.

IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems (ICECS)•Oct 24, 2022•0 citations

Switching Time Optimization for Binary Quantum Optimal Control

Xinyu Fei, Lucas T. Brady, Jeffrey M. Larson +2 more

Quantum optimal control is a technique for controlling the evolution of a quantum system and has been applied to a wide range of problems in quantum physics. We study a binary quantum control optimization problem, where control decisions are binary-valued and the problem is solved in diverse quantum algorithms. In this paper, we utilize classical optimization and computing techniques to develop an algorithmic framework that sequentially optimizes the number of control switches and the duration of each control interval on a continuous time horizon. Specifically, we first solve the continuous relaxation of the binary control problem based on time discretization and then use a heuristic to obtain a controller sequence with a penalty on the number of switches. Then, we formulate a switching time optimization model and apply sequential least-squares programming with accelerated time-evolution simulation to solve the model. We demonstrate that our computational framework can obtain binary controls with high-quality performance and also reduce computational time via solving a family of quantum control instances in various quantum physics applications.

arXiv:2308.03132•ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing•Jul 19, 2024•3 citations

Time-minimum control of quantum purity for 2-level Lindblad equations

William Clark, Anthony Bloch, Leonardo Jesus Colombo +1 more

We study time-minimum optimal control for a class of quantum two-dimensional dissipative systems whose dynamics are governed by the Lindblad equation and where control inputs acts only in the Hamiltonian. The dynamics of the control system are analyzed as a bi-linear control system on the Bloch ball after a decoupling of such dynamics into intra- and inter-unitary orbits. The (singular) control problem consists of finding a trajectory of the state variables solving a radial equation in the minimum amount of time, starting at the completely mixed state and ending at the state with the maximum achievable purity.The boundary value problem determined by the time-minimum singular optimal control problem is studied numerically. If controls are unbounded, simulations show that multiple local minimal solutions might exist. To find the unique globally minimal solution, we must repeat the algorithm for various initial conditions and find the best solution out of all of the candidates. If controls are bounded, optimal controls are given by bang-bang controls using the Pontryagin minimum principle. Using a switching map we construct optimal solutions consisting of singular arcs. If controls are bounded, the analysis of our model also implies classical analysis done previously for this problem.

arXiv:1904.10325•Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S•Apr 21, 2019•5 citations
Recently there has been a lot of interest in the potential applications of performing computations on systems whose governing physical laws are quantum, rather than classical in nature. These quantum computers would have the ability to perform some calculations which would not be feasible for their classical counterparts. To date, however, a quantum computer large enough to perform useful calculations has yet to be built. Before this can be accomplished, a method must be developed to control the underlying quantum systems. This is a problem which can naturally be formulated in the language of control theory. This report outlines the basic control-theoretic approach to time-optimally controlling quantum systems evolving under the dynamics of the Schr\"{o}dinger operator equation. It is found that under the assumption of non-singularity, the controls which produce time-optimal trajectories are bang-bang. With this in mind, a switching time algorithm is implemented to find optimal bang-bang controls.
As technological advances allow us to peer into and beyond microscopic phenomena, new theoretical developments are necessary to facilitate this exploration. In particular, the potential afforded by utilizing quantum resources promises to dramatically affect scientific research, communications, computation, and material science. \n \nControl theory is the field dedicated to the manipulation of systems, and quantum control theory pertains to the manoeuvring of quantum systems. Due to the inherent sensitivity of quantum ensembles to their environment, time-optimal solutions should be found in order to minimize exposure to external sources. Furthermore, the complexity of the Schr\\"odinger equation in describing the evolution of a unitary operator makes the analytical discovery of time-optimal solutions rare, motivating the development of numerical algorithms. \n \nThe seminal result of classical control is the Pontryagin Maximum Principle, which implies that a restriction to bounded control amplitudes admits two classifications of trajectories: bang-bang and singular. Extensions of this result to generalized control problems yield the same classification and hence arise in the study of quantum dynamics. While singular trajectories are often avoided in both classical and quantum literature, a full optimal synthesis requires that we analyze the possibility of their existence. \n \nWith this in mind, this treatise will examine the issue of time-optimal quantum control. In particular, we examine the results of existing numerical algorithms, including Gradient Ascent Pulse Engineering and the Kaya-Huneault method. We elaborate on the ideas of the Kaya-Huneault algorithm and present an alternative algorithm that we title the Real-Embedding algorithm. These methods are then compared when used to simulate unitary evolution. \n \nThis is followed by a brief examination on the conditions for the existence of singular controls, as well possible ideas and developments in creating geometry based numerical algorithms.
Optimization is one of the key applications of quantum computing where a quantum speedup has been an eagerly anticipated outcome. A promising approach to optimization using quantum dynamics is to consider a linear combination $s(t)B+[1\ensuremath{-}s(t)]C$ of two noncommuting Hamiltonians BBB and CCC, where CCC encodes the solution to the optimization problem in its ground state, BBB is a Hamiltonian whose ground state is easy to prepare, and $s(t)\ensuremath{\in}[0,1]$ is the bounded ``switching schedule'' or ``path,'' with $t\ensuremath{\in}[0,{t}_{f}]$. This approach encompasses two of the most widely studied quantum-optimization algorithms: quantum annealing [QA; continuous s(t)s(t)s(t)] and the quantum approximate optimization algorithm [QAOA; piecewise constant s(t)s(t)s(t)]. While it is notoriously difficult to prove a quantum advantage for either algorithm, it is possible to compare and contrast them by finding the optimal s(t)s(t)s(t). Here we provide a rigorous analysis of this quantum optimal control problem, entirely within the geometric framework of Pontryagin's maximum principle of optimal control theory. We extend earlier results, derived in a purely closed-system setting, to open systems. This is the natural setting for experimental realizations of QA and QAOA. In the closed-system setting it was shown that the optimal solution is a ``bang-anneal-bang'' schedule, with the bangs characterized by s(t)=0s(t)=0s(t)=0 and s(t)=1s(t)=1s(t)=1 in finite subintervals of [0,tf][0,{t}_{f}][0,tf​], in particular, s(0)=0s(0)=0s(0)=0 and s(tf)=1s({t}_{f})=1s(tf​)=1, in contrast to the standard prescription s(0)=1s(0)=1s(0)=1 and s(tf)=0s({t}_{f})=0s(tf​)=0 of QA. As an example, we prove that for a single spin-1/21/21/2, the optimal solution in the closed-system setting is the bang-bang schedule, switching midway from $s\ensuremath{\equiv}0$ to $s\ensuremath{\equiv}1$. For finite-dimensional environments and without any approximations we identify sufficient conditions ensuring that either the bang-anneal, anneal-bang, or bang-anneal-bang schedules are optimal, and recover the optimality of s(0)=0s(0)=0s(0)=0 and s(tf)=1s({t}_{f})=1s(tf​)=1. However, for infinite-dimensional environments and a system described by an adiabatic Redfield master equation we do not recover the bang-type optimal solution. In fact we can only identify conditions under which s(tf)=1s({t}_{f})=1s(tf​)=1, and even this result is not recovered in the fully Markovian limit, suggesting that the pure anneal-type schedule is optimal. Our open-system results have implications for the use of experimental quantum-information processors, which are by necessity noisy, and suggest that in this practical sense the optimal schedules for quantum optimization are likely to be continuous.
Optimal control theory is applied to analyze the time-optimal solution with a single scalar control knob in a two-level quantum system without quantum decoherence. Emphasis is placed on the dependence on the maximum control strength umax{u}_{\text{max}}umax​. General constraints on the optimal protocol are derived and used to rigorously parametrize the time-optimal solution. Two concrete problems are investigated. For generic state preparation problems, both multiple bang-bang and bang-singular-bang are legitimate and should be considered. Generally, the optimal is bang-bang for small umax{u}_{\text{max}}umax​, and there exists a state-dependent critical amplitude above which singular control emerges. For the X-gate operation of a qubit, the optimal protocol is exclusively multiple bang-bang. The minimum gate time is about 80% of that based on the resonant Rabi $\ensuremath{\pi}$-pulse over a wide range of control strength; in the ${u}_{\text{max}}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$ limit, this ratio is derived to be $\ensuremath{\pi}/4$. To develop practically feasible protocols, we present methods to smooth the abrupt changes in the bang-bang control while preserving perfect gate fidelity. The presence of bang-bang segments in the time-optimal protocol indicates that the high-frequency components and a full calculation (instead of the commonly adopted rotating wave approximation) are essential for the ultimate quantum speed limit.
The semiconducting technologies appear to be an ideal platform to construct quantum systems, inheriting the classical silicon techniques and controllable circuits, and exploiting the quantum nature of confined particles. Meanwhile, quantum optimal control algorithms have been proven to be an efficient tool to assist quantum system manipulation, quantum computing and quantum applications. In this paper, we review some of the main quantum optimal control algorithms in closed quantum systems, and we explore their implementation to charge and spin-based semiconductor qubits. In addition, we propose a bang-bang control algorithm and we examine its performance in selected case studies.
Quantum optimal control is a technique for controlling the evolution of a quantum system and has been applied to a wide range of problems in quantum physics. We study a binary quantum control optimization problem, where control decisions are binary-valued and the problem is solved in diverse quantum algorithms. In this paper, we utilize classical optimization and computing techniques to develop an algorithmic framework that sequentially optimizes the number of control switches and the duration of each control interval on a continuous time horizon. Specifically, we first solve the continuous relaxation of the binary control problem based on time discretization and then use a heuristic to obtain a controller sequence with a penalty on the number of switches. Then, we formulate a switching time optimization model and apply sequential least-squares programming with accelerated time-evolution simulation to solve the model. We demonstrate that our computational framework can obtain binary controls with high-quality performance and also reduce computational time via solving a family of quantum control instances in various quantum physics applications.
We study time-minimum optimal control for a class of quantum two-dimensional dissipative systems whose dynamics are governed by the Lindblad equation and where control inputs acts only in the Hamiltonian. The dynamics of the control system are analyzed as a bi-linear control system on the Bloch ball after a decoupling of such dynamics into intra- and inter-unitary orbits. The (singular) control problem consists of finding a trajectory of the state variables solving a radial equation in the minimum amount of time, starting at the completely mixed state and ending at the state with the maximum achievable purity.The boundary value problem determined by the time-minimum singular optimal control problem is studied numerically. If controls are unbounded, simulations show that multiple local minimal solutions might exist. To find the unique globally minimal solution, we must repeat the algorithm for various initial conditions and find the best solution out of all of the candidates. If controls are bounded, optimal controls are given by bang-bang controls using the Pontryagin minimum principle. Using a switching map we construct optimal solutions consisting of singular arcs. If controls are bounded, the analysis of our model also implies classical analysis done previously for this problem.