Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Modern Physics Letters A

INTERPRETATION AND PREDICTABILITY OF QUANTUM MECHANICS AND QUANTUM COSMOLOGY

Sumio Wada

Published Jun 1, 1988• 12 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A non-probabilistic interpretation of quantum mechanics asserts that we get a prediction only when a wave function has a peak. Taking this interpretation seriously, we discuss how to find a peak in the wave function of the universe, by using some minisuperspace models with homogeneous degrees of freedom and also a model with cosmological perturbations. Then we show how to recover our classical picture of the universe from the quantum theory, and comment on the physical meaning of the backreaction equation.

DOI
10.1142/s0217732388000775

Related papers

Correlations in the wave function of the Universe

J. J. Halliwell

The Everett-type interpretations of quantum mechanics and quantum cosmology proposed independently by Hartle, Geroch, and Wada are discussed. They essentially involve regarding a strong peak in the wave function as a definite prediction. Wave functions in quantum cosmology are usually peaked about correlations between coordinates and momenta, and methods for identifying such correlations are introduced. The first method involves Wigner's function, a quantum-mechanical analogue of the classical phase-space distribution. The properties of this distribution are discussed and it is shown how it can be of use in describing the emergence of classical behavior from quantum systems. The second method involves a suitably chosen canonical transformation. These methods are applied to harmonic-oscillator examples, which are of relevance to scalar field fluctuations in inflationary universe models. These methods are also applied to WKB wave functions in quantum mechanics and quantum cosmology. The manner in which the wave function becomes peaked about sets of classical solutions is elucidated. This is extended to include inhomogeneous perturbations about minisuperspace in quantum cosmology, and the derivation of the semiclassical Einstein equations, ${G}_{\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\nu}}$=8\ensuremath{\pi}G〈${T}_{\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\nu}}$〉, from the Wheeler-DeWitt equation is considered. A condition under which they are valid is derived. It is essentially the requirement that the distribution of ${T}_{\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\nu}}$, as a function of the matter modes, is strongly peaked about its average value. Some situations in which this condition is satisfied are discussed.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Dec 15, 1987•163 citations

The Interpretation of Quantum Cosmological Models

J. J. Halliwell

We consider the problem of extracting physical predictions from the wave function of the universe in quantum cosmological models. We state the features of quantum cosmology an interpretational scheme should confront. We discuss the Everett interpretation, and extensions of it, and their application to quantum cosmology. We review the steps that are normally taken in the process of extracting predictions from solutions to the Wheeler-DeWitt equation for quantum cosmological models. Some difficulties and their possible resolution are discussed. We conclude that the usual wave function-based approach admits at best a rather heuristic interpretation, although it may in the future be justified by appeal to the decoherent histories approach.

arXiv:gr-qc/9208001•General Relativity and Gravitation•Aug 5, 1992•8 citations

Interpretation of the wave function of the Universe

Alexander Vilenkin

A probabilistic interpretation of the wave function of the Universe is proposed in which ``probability'' and ``unitarity'' are inherently approximate concepts. Their validity is limited by the accuracy of the semiclassical approximation for the entire Universe. This approach (which is a logical extension of DeWitt's) defines a positive-semidefinite probability distribution and satisfies the correspondence principle with classical cosmology and with quantum mechanics. In particular, one recovers the standard probabilistic interpretation of the wave function for a small subsystem of the Universe.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Feb 15, 1989•216 citations

Quantum cosmology: how to interpret and obtain results

Nelson Pinto-Neto

We argue that the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics cannot be applied to quantum cosmology. Among the alternative interpretations, we choose to apply the Bohm-de Broglie interpretation of quantum mechanics to canonical quantum cosmology. For minisuperspace models, we show that there is no problem of time in this interpretation, and that quantum effects can avoid the initial singularity, create inflation and isotropize the Universe. For the general case, it is shown that, irrespective of any regularization or choice of factor ordering of the Wheeler-DeWitt equation, the unique relevant quantum effect which does not break spacetime is the change of its signature from lorentzian to euclidean. The other quantum effects are either trivial or break the four-geometry of spacetime. A Bohm-de Broglie picture of a quantum geometrodynamics is constructed, which allows the investigation of these latter structures.

Brazilian Journal of Physics•Jun 1, 2000•12 citations

Wave Function of the Universe and Its Meaning

Ali Mostafazadeh

For a FRW-spacetime coupled to an arbitrary real scalar field, we endow the solution space of the associated Wheeler-DeWitt equation with a Hilbert-space structure, construct the observables, and introduce the physical wave functions of the universe that admit a genuine probabilistic interpretation. We also discuss a proposal for the formulation of the dynamics. The approach to quantum cosmology outlined in this article is based on the results obtained within the theory of pseudo-Hermitian operators. 1

•Jan 1, 2003•8 citations

Interpreting the wave function

Jean-Luc Lehners

This chapter discusses how a classical universe arises out of the quantum wave function of the universe. The process of decoherence is described, first in general and then applied to cosmology. The classicalization of the background spacetime (and the associated reduction in interference between saddle points) as well as the classicalization of long-wavelength perturbation modes is discussed, by studying an example of interactions between background and fluctuations, as well as interaction between perturbation modes of different wavelengths. Comments on the interpretation of the wave function are included.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Feb 2, 2026•0 citations
A non-probabilistic interpretation of quantum mechanics asserts that we get a prediction only when a wave function has a peak. Taking this interpretation seriously, we discuss how to find a peak in the wave function of the universe, by using some minisuperspace models with homogeneous degrees of freedom and also a model with cosmological perturbations. Then we show how to recover our classical picture of the universe from the quantum theory, and comment on the physical meaning of the backreaction equation.
The Everett-type interpretations of quantum mechanics and quantum cosmology proposed independently by Hartle, Geroch, and Wada are discussed. They essentially involve regarding a strong peak in the wave function as a definite prediction. Wave functions in quantum cosmology are usually peaked about correlations between coordinates and momenta, and methods for identifying such correlations are introduced. The first method involves Wigner's function, a quantum-mechanical analogue of the classical phase-space distribution. The properties of this distribution are discussed and it is shown how it can be of use in describing the emergence of classical behavior from quantum systems. The second method involves a suitably chosen canonical transformation. These methods are applied to harmonic-oscillator examples, which are of relevance to scalar field fluctuations in inflationary universe models. These methods are also applied to WKB wave functions in quantum mechanics and quantum cosmology. The manner in which the wave function becomes peaked about sets of classical solutions is elucidated. This is extended to include inhomogeneous perturbations about minisuperspace in quantum cosmology, and the derivation of the semiclassical Einstein equations, ${G}_{\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\nu}}$=8\ensuremath{\pi}G〈${T}_{\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\nu}}$〉, from the Wheeler-DeWitt equation is considered. A condition under which they are valid is derived. It is essentially the requirement that the distribution of ${T}_{\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\nu}}$, as a function of the matter modes, is strongly peaked about its average value. Some situations in which this condition is satisfied are discussed.
We consider the problem of extracting physical predictions from the wave function of the universe in quantum cosmological models. We state the features of quantum cosmology an interpretational scheme should confront. We discuss the Everett interpretation, and extensions of it, and their application to quantum cosmology. We review the steps that are normally taken in the process of extracting predictions from solutions to the Wheeler-DeWitt equation for quantum cosmological models. Some difficulties and their possible resolution are discussed. We conclude that the usual wave function-based approach admits at best a rather heuristic interpretation, although it may in the future be justified by appeal to the decoherent histories approach.
A probabilistic interpretation of the wave function of the Universe is proposed in which ``probability'' and ``unitarity'' are inherently approximate concepts. Their validity is limited by the accuracy of the semiclassical approximation for the entire Universe. This approach (which is a logical extension of DeWitt's) defines a positive-semidefinite probability distribution and satisfies the correspondence principle with classical cosmology and with quantum mechanics. In particular, one recovers the standard probabilistic interpretation of the wave function for a small subsystem of the Universe.
We argue that the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics cannot be applied to quantum cosmology. Among the alternative interpretations, we choose to apply the Bohm-de Broglie interpretation of quantum mechanics to canonical quantum cosmology. For minisuperspace models, we show that there is no problem of time in this interpretation, and that quantum effects can avoid the initial singularity, create inflation and isotropize the Universe. For the general case, it is shown that, irrespective of any regularization or choice of factor ordering of the Wheeler-DeWitt equation, the unique relevant quantum effect which does not break spacetime is the change of its signature from lorentzian to euclidean. The other quantum effects are either trivial or break the four-geometry of spacetime. A Bohm-de Broglie picture of a quantum geometrodynamics is constructed, which allows the investigation of these latter structures.
For a FRW-spacetime coupled to an arbitrary real scalar field, we endow the solution space of the associated Wheeler-DeWitt equation with a Hilbert-space structure, construct the observables, and introduce the physical wave functions of the universe that admit a genuine probabilistic interpretation. We also discuss a proposal for the formulation of the dynamics. The approach to quantum cosmology outlined in this article is based on the results obtained within the theory of pseudo-Hermitian operators. 1
This chapter discusses how a classical universe arises out of the quantum wave function of the universe. The process of decoherence is described, first in general and then applied to cosmology. The classicalization of the background spacetime (and the associated reduction in interference between saddle points) as well as the classicalization of long-wavelength perturbation modes is discussed, by studying an example of interactions between background and fluctuations, as well as interaction between perturbation modes of different wavelengths. Comments on the interpretation of the wave function are included.