Particle in one dimensional potential well demonstrates typical quantum mechanical behaviors determined by the related Schrodinger equation. The problem is solved here with a quasi-classical particle model that qualifies for quantum wave description. Our results cover majority of previous conclusions and reveal new mechanisms that, closure of the particle’s trajectory leads to quantization and lateral projections of particle’s three dimensional trajectories generate the Schrodinger wave functions for different energies. We explain that, Schrodinger wave functions represent different modes of particle’s motion and their amplitudes might measure the probability density that the particle is to be observed, but their interference invalids the probabilistic implication.
Particle in one dimensional potential well demonstrates typical quantum mechanical behaviors determined by the related Schrodinger equation. The problem is solved here with a quasi-classical particle model that qualifies for quantum wave description. Our results cover majority of previous conclusions and reveal new mechanisms that, closure of the particle’s trajectory leads to quantization and lateral projections of particle’s three dimensional trajectories generate the Schrodinger wave functions for different energies. We explain that, Schrodinger wave functions represent different modes of particle’s motion and their amplitudes might measure the probability density that the particle is to be observed, but their interference invalids the probabilistic implication.
Introducing a dimensional unit \hbar into classical mechanics, we make classical wave functions √ρ1exp (iS1/\hbar)-√ρ2exp (iS2/\hbar) for a one-particle system in the configuration space where √ρ1exp (iS1/\hbar) corresponds to the incident path (or one half) of an orbit and √ρ2exp (iS2/\hbar) to the outgoing (or another half), and ρ's and S's are densities and actions respectively. These classical wave functions are compared with the corresponding wave functions of solutions of the Schrödinger equation for three one-particle systems, the scattering by a Coulomb potential, the linear harmonic oscillator and an electron bound by a Coulomb potential. From the essential correspondence between them it is concluded that the Schrödinger wave function describes the steady, causal but a little imaginary motion of the one-particle system as √ρexp (iS/\hbar) in the configuration space where ρ is a density and S an action, and that the states which the wave equation describes exist continuously (not discrete) and the (discrete) stationary states are the ones where √ρexp (iS/\hbar) is uniquely determined throughout an orbit. The Dirac equation shows that an electron of optics (or the electromagnetic wave equation) can be considered as the Schrödinger (or Dirac) equation for the motion of a photon, a particle, in a potential. A quantum-electrodynamical wave equation which is composed of the Dirac equation with a Coulomb potential and the electromagnetic wave equation is constructed for the steady motion of a one-electron system without recource to the so-called second-quantization method. It gives finite energy shifts. A line shift is calculated: ΔE(2S1/2 →2P1/2) \cong709 Mc/s.
Using a novel quasi-relativistic wave equation, which can give precise results up to energies ~mc2, exact quantum mechanical solutions are found which corresponds to a particle with mass moving through one-dimensional piecewise constant potentials. As expected, at low particle’s speeds, the found solutions coincide with the solutions of the same problems calculated using the Schrödinger equation; however, as it should be, both solutions have a significative difference at quasi-relativistic speeds. Then, it is argued that the quasi-relativistic wave equation provides a simpler description than a fully relativistic theory or the perturbation approach for a quantum particle moving at quasi-relativistic energies through piecewise constant potentials.
In this chapter, the Schrödinger equation is “derived” for particles that can be described by de Broglie waves. The Schrödinger equation is very different from the corresponding equation of motion in classical mechanics. In order to illustrate the fundamental differences between the two theories, one of the simplest problems of particle dynamics is solved in both Newtonian and quantum mechanics. This simple example also helps to show that quantum mechanics is the fundamental theory and classical mechanics is an approximation, a remarkably good approximation, when considering macroscopic objects. The solution of the Schrödinger equation is presented for a particle inside a box and the quantization condition is derived. The amazing possibility of quantum tunneling when a particle is incident on a barrier of height larger than the energy of the incident particle is also discussed. Finally the three-dimensional Schrödinger equation is solved for the hydrogen atom.
The Schrödinger equation assumes that a particle behaves as a wave and yields a solution in terms of wave function and the energy of the particle under consideration. Once the wave function is known, then everything about the particle can be deduced from the wave function. This chapter covers the development of the Schrödinger wave equation and its applications to one-dimensional systems. Time-dependent and time-independent Schrödinger equations, bound and scattering states, probability density, probability current and expectation values, the solution of the time-independent 1D-Schrödinger equation for a free particle, infinite as well as finite potential wells, potential steps, and the finite potential barrier are discussed in detail in the chapter. The phenomenon of tunneling, relevance and the importance of the free particle, potential wells and potential barriers to contemporary fields of physics and chemistry, periodic solids and their band structures, the Kronig-Penney model, confined states in quantum wells, and wires and dots are other topics presented in innovative manners in the chapter. The importance of the topics presented here is demonstrated through carefully chosen solved examples and unsolved exercises from contemporary fields of sciences.
We propose that the Schrodinger equation results from applying the classical wave equation to describe the physical system in which subatomic particles play random motion, thereby leading to quantum mechanics. The physical reality described by the wave function is subatomic particle moving randomly. Therefore, the characteristics of quantum mechanics have a dual nature, one of them is the deterministic nature carried on from classical physics, and the other is the probabilistic nature coined by particle's random motion. Based on this model, almost all of open questions in quantum mechanics can be explained consistently, which include the particle-wave duality, the principle of quantum superposition, the interference pattern of double-slit experiments, and the boundary between the classical world and the quantum world. The current quantum mechanics is a mixture of matrix mechanics and wave mechanics, which are sharply conflicting in principle. Matrix mechanics treats quantum particles as classical particles with fixed relation between the particle's position and its momentum. The matrix mechanics, in fact, belongs to the old quantum theory. Both Born's non-commutative relation and Heisenberg uncertainty relation originate from matrix mechanics. However, in wave mechanics, there is no any fixed relation between the particle's position and its momentum, and the particle's position and its momentum belong to immeasurable physical quantities. Therefore, there is no need for non-commutative relation and uncertainty relation in wave mechanics.
The Schrödinger equation is a significant achievement on the development of quantum mechanics. By solving the Schrödinger equation, the fundamental behaviors and properties of a microscopic particle can be found in one- to three-dimensions. The article focuses on the derivations of quantum harmonic oscillators in one dimension by solving second order-differential equation. The wave functions, probability densities under different energy levels are presented. The results can be used to estimate different forms of continuous potential experienced by an oscillator. By calculating the uncertainty relation of the oscillator under one specific excited state, the general relation can be confirmed. Based on the output, by splitting the variables, the two-dimensional harmonic oscillator can also be derived. The degenerate energy levels are presented as . Numerical simulations are made to visualize those results and suggests the relation of energy levels and number of maxima of the probability densities.