The Quantum Mechanics is interpreted, in this article, in a simple and direct way. By combining the unitary evolution with the quantum condition that observations require the state vector to be an eigenstate of the observable, a discontinuity in evolution (the state vector reduction) seems to be mandatory. Thus, for each such discontinuity, new initial conditions for the time evolution state vector are needed, and they are obtained by measurements. Delayed-choice experiments suggest that these new initial conditions are specified after the discontinuity takes place. Consequently, because it needs initial conditions that can be specified with a delay, the time evolving state vector is semi-realistic (in the sense that it is not completely specified until the measurement is performed), and not entirely realistic. The collapse of the wave function, especially when it is combined with the entanglement, seems to be a non-local phenomenon. In fact, the non-locality is present only as a consistency requirement for the initial conditions needed to select a solution of the evolution equation. The Direct Interpretation is intended to provide to our intuition a physical background, for helping us thinking about quantum phenomena. It identifies the main counterintuitive parts of the Quantum Mechanics in the discontinuity and the delayed initial conditions. Because it makes minimal assumptions, it is compatible with the main interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. Two principal unclear points of Quantum Mechanics are identified in the discontinuities, and the measurement problem. Both problems will be approached in subsequent articles.
The Quantum Mechanics is interpreted, in this article, in a simple and direct way. By combining the unitary evolution with the quantum condition that observations require the state vector to be an eigenstate of the observable, a discontinuity in evolution (the state vector reduction) seems to be mandatory. Thus, for each such discontinuity, new initial conditions for the time evolution state vector are needed, and they are obtained by measurements. Delayed-choice experiments suggest that these new initial conditions are specified after the discontinuity takes place. Consequently, because it needs initial conditions that can be specified with a delay, the time evolving state vector is semi-realistic (in the sense that it is not completely specified until the measurement is performed), and not entirely realistic. The collapse of the wave function, especially when it is combined with the entanglement, seems to be a non-local phenomenon. In fact, the non-locality is present only as a consistency requirement for the initial conditions needed to select a solution of the evolution equation. The Direct Interpretation is intended to provide to our intuition a physical background, for helping us thinking about quantum phenomena. It identifies the main counterintuitive parts of the Quantum Mechanics in the discontinuity and the delayed initial conditions. Because it makes minimal assumptions, it is compatible with the main interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. Two principal unclear points of Quantum Mechanics are identified in the discontinuities, and the measurement problem. Both problems will be approached in subsequent articles.
The problem of quantum state reduction The fundamental problem of quantum mechanics, as that theory is presently understood, is to make sense of the reduction of the state vector (i.e. collapse of the wave function ), denoted here by R . This issue is usually addressed in terms of the ‘quantum measurement problem’, which is to comprehend how, upon measurement of a quantum system, this (seemingly) discontinuous R -process can come about. A measurement, after all, merely consists of the quantum state under consideration becoming entangled with a more extended part of the physical universe, e.g. with a measuring apparatus. This measuring apparatus – together with the observing physicist and their common environment – should, according to conventional understanding, all also have some quantum description. Accordingly, there should be a quantum description of this entire quantum state, involving not only the original system under consideration but also the apparatus, physicist, and remaining environment – and this entire state would be expected to evolve continuously, solely according to the Schrödinger equation (unitary evolution), here denoted by the symbol U . Numerous different attitudes to R have been expressed over many years, ever since quantum mechanics was first clearly formulated. The most influential viewpoint has been the ‘Copenhagen interpretation’ of Niels Bohr, according to which the state vector │ψ〉 is not to be taken seriously as describing a quantum-level physical reality, but is to be regarded as merely referring to our (maximal) ‘knowledge’ of a physical system, and whose ultimate role is simply to provide us with a means to calculate probabilities when a measurement is performed on the system.
An interpretation of quantum mechanics is presented in which there is one hidden variable. While this number of hidden variables is insufficient to explain Bell nonlocality, it can help solve the measurement problem. It also provides an explanation of the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment that is more intuitive than current explanations. In addition, a theory of nonlocality emerges directly from its assumptions. The key idea is that from the perspective of an outside observer, not correlated with an observed system, we treat all interactions within the system as unitary. However, from the perspective of an “observer” inside the system, we treat all new entanglements as “micro-measurements” and as a projection onto some basis of measurement. One particle can “measure” another. Thus, particles will have a defined value on one measurement basis from an inside perspective. This means that the wave function, from the outside view, will at times describe an objective uncertainty, at other times a subjective uncertainty and at yet other times a combination of both. The standard wave function describes the total uncertainty, the minimal uncertainty that is present for any observer outside of the system, while for an “observer” inside the system, only the objective part of the uncertainty remains, and this can be described by an inner wave function. The hidden variable is invisible to the outside observer.
An interpretation of quantum mechanics is presented in which there is one hidden variable. While this number of hidden variables is insufficient to explain Bell nonlocality, it can help solve the measurement problem. It also provides an explanation of the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment that is more intuitive than current explanations. In addition, a theory of nonlocality emerges directly from its assumptions. The key idea is that from the perspective of an outside observer, not correlated with an observed system, we treat all interactions within the system as unitary. However, from the perspective of an “observer” inside the system, we treat all new entanglements as “micro-measurements” and as a projection onto some basis of measurement. One particle can “measure” another. Thus, particles will have a defined value on one measurement basis from an inside perspective. This means that the wave function, from the outside view, will at times describe an objective uncertainty, at other times a subjective uncertainty and at yet other times a combination of both. The standard wave function describes the total uncertainty, the minimal uncertainty that is present for any observer outside of the system, while for an “observer” inside the system, only the objective part of the uncertainty remains, and this can be described by an inner wave function. The hidden variable is invisible to the outside observer.
An interpretation of quantum mechanics is presented in which there is one hidden variable. While this number of hidden variables is insufficient to explain Bell nonlocality, it can help solve the measurement problem. It also provides an explanation of the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment that is more intuitive than current explanations. In addition, a theory of nonlocality emerges directly from its assumptions. The key idea is that from the perspective of an outside observer, not entangled with an observed system, we treat all interactions within the system as unitary. However, from the perspective of an “observer” inside the system, entangled with the system, we treat all new entanglements as “micro-observations” and as a projection onto some basis of measurement. One particle can “observe” another. Thus, particles will have a defined value on one measurement basis from the inside perspective. This means that the wave function, from the outside view, will at times describe an objective uncertainty, at other times a subjective uncertainty and at yet other times a combination of both. The standard wave function describes the total uncertainty, the minimal uncertainty that is present for any observer outside of the system, while for an observer inside the system, only the objective part of the uncertainty remains, and this can be described by an inner wave function. The hidden variable is invisible to the outside observer.
An interpretation of quantum mechanics is presented in which there is one hidden variable. While this number of hidden variables is insufficient to explain Bell nonlocality, it can help solve the measurement problem. It also provides an explanation of the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment that is more intuitive than current explanations. In addition, a theory of nonlocality emerges directly from its assumptions. The key idea is that from the perspective of an outside observer, not entangled with an observed system, we treat all interactions within the system as unitary. However, from the perspective of an “observer” inside the system, entangled with the system, we treat all new entanglements as “micro-observations” and as a projection onto some basis of measurement. One particle can “observe” another. Thus, particles will have a defined value on one measurement basis from the inside perspective. This means that the wave function, from the outside view, will at times describe an objective uncertainty, at other times a subjective uncertainty and at yet other times a combination of both. The standard wave function describes the total uncertainty, the minimal uncertainty that is present for any observer outside of the system, while for an observer inside the system, only the objective part of the uncertainty remains, and this can be described by an inner wave function. The hidden variable is invisible to the outside observer.
An interpretation of quantum mechanics is presented in which there is one hidden variable. While this number of hidden variables is insufficient to explain Bell nonlocality, it can help solve the measurement problem. It also provides an explanation of the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment that is more intuitive than current explanations. In addition, a theory of nonlocality emerges directly from its assumptions. The key idea is that from the perspective of an outside observer, not correlated with an observed system, we treat all interactions within the system as unitary. However, from the perspective of an “observer” inside the system, we treat all new entanglements as “micro-observations” and as a projection onto some basis of measurement. One particle can “observe” another. Thus, particles will have a defined value on one measurement basis from an inside perspective. This means that the wave function, from the outside view, will at times describe an objective uncertainty, at other times a subjective uncertainty and at yet other times a combination of both. The standard wave function describes the total uncertainty, the minimal uncertainty that is present for any observer outside of the system, while for an observer inside the system, only the objective part of the uncertainty remains, and this can be described by an inner wave function. The hidden variable is invisible to the outside observer.