© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Three-Dimensional Annihilation Imaging of Trapped Antiprotons

M. Fujiwara, M. Amoretti, G. Bonomi, A. Bouchta, Paul David Bowe, C. Carraro, Claudio Lenz Cesar, M. Charlton, M. Doser, VALENTINA FILIPPINI, A. Fontana, R. Funakoshi, P. Genova, Jeffrey Scott Hangst, R. Hayano, L. V. Jørgensen, Vittorio Lagomarsino, Rolf Landua, Evandro Lodi-Rizzini, M. Marchesotti, M. M. Macri, N. Madsen, Giulio Manuzio, P. Montagna, Petra Riedler, Alberto Rotondi, G. Rouleau, G. Testera, A. Variola, Dirk Peter van der Werf, Y. Yamazaki

Published Feb 13, 2004• 45 citations

Abstract

We demonstrate three-dimensional imaging of antiprotons in a Penning trap, by reconstructing annihilation vertices from the trajectories of the charged annihilation products. The unique capability of antiparticle imaging has allowed, for the first time, the observation of the spatial distribution of the particle loss in a Penning trap. The radial loss of antiprotons on the trap wall is localized to small spots, strongly breaking the azimuthal symmetry expected for an ideal trap. Our observations have important implications for detection of antihydrogen annihilations.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.92.065005

Related papers

Three Dimensional Annihilation Imaging of Antiprotons in a Penning Trap

M. Fujiwara

We demonstrate three‐dimensional annihilation imaging of antiprotons trapped in a Penning trap. Exploiting unusual feature of antiparticles, we investigate a previously unexplored regime in particle transport; the proximity of the trap wall. Particle loss on the wall, the final step of radial transport, is observed to be highly non‐uniform, both radially and azimuthally. These observations have considerable implications for the production and detection of antihydrogen atoms.

arXiv:physics/0401162•AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2003•1 citation

Spatial Distribution of Cold Antihydrogen Formation

N. Madsen, M. Amoretti, C. Amsler +29 more

Antihydrogen is formed when antiprotons are mixed with cold positrons in a nested Penning trap. We present experimental evidence, obtained using our antihydrogen annihilation detector, that the spatial distribution of the emerging antihydrogen atoms is independent of the positron temperature and axially enhanced. This indicates that antihydrogen is formed before the antiprotons are in thermal equilibrium with the positron plasma. This result has important implications for the trapping and spectroscopy of antihydrogen.

Physical Review Letters•Jan 27, 2005•85 citations

Discriminating between antihydrogen and mirror-trapped antiprotons in a minimum-B trap

C. Amole, Gorm Bruun Andresen, M. D. Ashkezari +35 more

Recently, antihydrogen atoms were trapped at CERN in a magnetic minimum (minimum-B) trap formed by superconducting octupole and mirror magnet coils. The trapped antiatoms were detected by rapidly turning off these magnets, thereby eliminating the magnetic minimum and releasing any antiatoms contained in the trap. Once released, these antiatoms quickly hit the trap wall, whereupon the positrons and antiprotons in the antiatoms annihilate. The antiproton annihilations produce easily detected signals; we used these signals to prove that we trapped antihydrogen. However, our technique could be confounded by mirror-trapped antiprotons, which would produce seemingly identical annihilation signals upon hitting the trap wall. In this paper, we discuss possible sources of mirror-trapped antiprotons and show that antihydrogen and antiprotons can be readily distinguished, often with the aid of applied electric fields, by analyzing the annihilation locations and times. We further discuss the general properties of antiproton and antihydrogen trajectories in this magnetic geometry, and reconstruct the antihydrogen energy distribution from the measured annihilation time history.

arXiv:1201.3944•New Journal of Physics•Jan 31, 2012•28 citations

Antihydrogen formation dynamics in a multipolar neutral anti-atom trap

Gorm Bruun Andresen, William Alan Bertsche, Paul David Bowe +33 more

Antihydrogen production in a neutral atom trap formed by an octupole-based magnetic field minimum is demonstrated using field-ionization of weakly bound anti-atoms. Using our unique annihilation imaging detector, we correlate antihydrogen detection by imaging and by field-ionization for the first time. We further establish how field-ionization causes radial redistribution of the antiprotons during antihydrogen formation and use this effect for the first simultaneous measurements of strongly and weakly bound antihydrogen atoms. Distinguishing between these provides critical information needed in the process of optimizing for trappable antihydrogen. These observations are of crucial importance to the ultimate goal of performing CPT tests involving antihydrogen, which likely depends upon trapping the anti-atom.

arXiv:1002.3036•Physics Letters B•Jan 31, 2010•41 citations

Antiproton Confinement in a Penning-Ioffe Trap for Antihydrogen

G. Gabrielse, P. Larochelle, David Le Sage +25 more

Antiprotons (p[over]) remain confined in a Penning trap, in sufficient numbers to form antihydrogen (H[over ) atoms via charge exchange, when the radial field of a quadrupole Ioffe trap is added. This first demonstration with p[over] suggests that quadrupole Ioffe traps can be superimposed upon p[over] and e(+) traps to attempt the capture of H[over] atoms as they form, contrary to conclusions of previous analyses.

Physical Review Letters•Mar 14, 2007•47 citations

Simulations of antihydrogen formation in a nested Penning trap

S. Jonsell, Dirk Peter van der Werf, M. Charlton

We have simulated the formation of antihydrogen through three-body recombination using classical trajectories of antiprotons and positrons. The simulations include several effects which are important in current antihydrogen experiments: the full motion of the antiproton repeatedly passing into and out of the positron plasma, the energy loss of antiprotons due to the interaction with the positron plasma, and the field-ionization of antihydrogen en route from the plasma to the detector. We find that whereas the overall simulated rate of formation of antihydrogen has a density dependence close to n 2 e , the rate of antihydrogen detection follows a power law less than 2. The difference is due to the effect of density dependent field ionization.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Jan 1, 2010•0 citations

We demonstrate three-dimensional imaging of antiprotons in a Penning trap, by reconstructing annihilation vertices from the trajectories of the charged annihilation products. The unique capability of antiparticle imaging has allowed, for the first time, the observation of the spatial distribution of the particle loss in a Penning trap. The radial loss of antiprotons on the trap wall is localized to small spots, strongly breaking the azimuthal symmetry expected for an ideal trap. Our observations have important implications for detection of antihydrogen annihilations.

Antihydrogen is formed when antiprotons are mixed with cold positrons in a nested Penning trap. We present experimental evidence, obtained using our antihydrogen annihilation detector, that the spatial distribution of the emerging antihydrogen atoms is independent of the positron temperature and axially enhanced. This indicates that antihydrogen is formed before the antiprotons are in thermal equilibrium with the positron plasma. This result has important implications for the trapping and spectroscopy of antihydrogen.

Recently, antihydrogen atoms were trapped at CERN in a magnetic minimum (minimum-B) trap formed by superconducting octupole and mirror magnet coils. The trapped antiatoms were detected by rapidly turning off these magnets, thereby eliminating the magnetic minimum and releasing any antiatoms contained in the trap. Once released, these antiatoms quickly hit the trap wall, whereupon the positrons and antiprotons in the antiatoms annihilate. The antiproton annihilations produce easily detected signals; we used these signals to prove that we trapped antihydrogen. However, our technique could be confounded by mirror-trapped antiprotons, which would produce seemingly identical annihilation signals upon hitting the trap wall. In this paper, we discuss possible sources of mirror-trapped antiprotons and show that antihydrogen and antiprotons can be readily distinguished, often with the aid of applied electric fields, by analyzing the annihilation locations and times. We further discuss the general properties of antiproton and antihydrogen trajectories in this magnetic geometry, and reconstruct the antihydrogen energy distribution from the measured annihilation time history.

Antihydrogen production in a neutral atom trap formed by an octupole-based magnetic field minimum is demonstrated using field-ionization of weakly bound anti-atoms. Using our unique annihilation imaging detector, we correlate antihydrogen detection by imaging and by field-ionization for the first time. We further establish how field-ionization causes radial redistribution of the antiprotons during antihydrogen formation and use this effect for the first simultaneous measurements of strongly and weakly bound antihydrogen atoms. Distinguishing between these provides critical information needed in the process of optimizing for trappable antihydrogen. These observations are of crucial importance to the ultimate goal of performing CPT tests involving antihydrogen, which likely depends upon trapping the anti-atom.

We have simulated the formation of antihydrogen through three-body recombination using classical trajectories of antiprotons and positrons. The simulations include several effects which are important in current antihydrogen experiments: the full motion of the antiproton repeatedly passing into and out of the positron plasma, the energy loss of antiprotons due to the interaction with the positron plasma, and the field-ionization of antihydrogen en route from the plasma to the detector. We find that whereas the overall simulated rate of formation of antihydrogen has a density dependence close to n 2 e , the rate of antihydrogen detection follows a power law less than 2. The difference is due to the effect of density dependent field ionization.