The analytic structure of many-body perturbation theory

Lennart Dabelow, Patrick Vorndamme, Peter Reimann

This paper explores the relation between the response of a generic isolated many-body quantum system to a weak-to-moderate perturbation on the one hand and the perturbation's matrix structure in the eigenbasis of the unperturbed system on the other hand. An analytical theory for this relationship is demonstrated and verified numerically.

Isaiah Shavitt, Rodney J. Bartlett

Scope The book focuses primarily on many-body (or better, many-electron) methods for electron correlation. These include Rayleigh–Schrödinger perturbation theory (RSPT) , particularly in its diagrammatic representation (referred to as many-body perturbation theory , or MBPT ), and coupled-cluster (CC) theory; their relationship to configuration interaction (CI) is included. Further extensions address properties other than the energy, and also excited states and multireference CC and MBPT methods. The many-body algebraic and diagrammatic methods used in electronic structure theory have their origin in quantum field theory and in the study of nuclear matter and nuclear structure. The second-quantization formalism was first introduced in a treatment of quantized fields by Dirac (1927) and was extended to fermion systems by Jordan and Klein (1927) and by Jordan and Wigner (1928). This formalism is particularly useful in field theory, in scattering problems and in the study of infinite systems because it easily handles problems involving infinite, indefinite or variable numbers of particles. The diagrammatic approach was introduced into field theory by Feynman (1949a,b) and applied to many-body systems by Hugenholtz (1957) and by Goldstone (1957). Many-body perturbation theory and its linked-diagram formalism were first introduced by Brueckner and Levinson (1955) and by Brueckner (1955), and were formalized by Goldstone (1957). Other important contributions to the methodology, first in field theory and then in the theory of nuclear structure, are due to Dyson (1949a,b), Wick (1950), Hubbard (1957, 1958a,b) and Frantz and Mills (1960). Applications to the electronic structure of atoms and molecules began with the work of Kelly (1963, 1964a,b, 1968), and molecular applications using finite analytical basis sets appeared in the work of Bartlett and Silver (1974a, b).

Giampaolo Co’

Lin Lin, Michael Lindsey

Many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) is widely used in quantum physics, chemistry, and materials science. At the heart of MBPT is the Feynman diagrammatic expansion, which is, simply speaking, an elegant way of organizing the combinatorially growing number of terms of a certain Taylor expansion. In particular, the construction of the `bold Feynman diagrammatic expansion' involves the partial resummation to infinite order of possibly divergent series of diagrams. This procedure demands investigation from both the combinatorial (perturbative) and the analytical (non-perturbative) viewpoints. In Part I of this two-part series, we illustrate how the combinatorial properties of Feynman diagrams in MBPT can be studied in the simplified setting of Gibbs measures (known as the Euclidean lattice field theory in the physics literature) and provide a self-contained explanation of Feynman diagrams in this setting. We prove the combinatorial validity of the bold diagrammatic expansion, with methods generalizable to several types of field theories and interactions. Our treatment simplifies the presentation and numerical study of known techniques in MBPT such as the self-consistent Hartree-Fock approximation (HF), the second-order Green's function approximation (GF2), and the GW approximation. The bold diagrams are closely related to the Luttinger-Ward (LW) formalism, which was proposed in 1960 but whose analytic properties have not been rigorously established. The analytical study of the LW formalism in the setting of Gibbs measures will be the topic of Part II.

Reiner M. Dreizler, Eberhard K. U. Gross