Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Algorithmica

Sharp Quantum versus Classical Query Complexity Separations

Niel de Beaudrap, Not Available Not Available, Not Available Not Available

Published Nov 6, 2002• 34 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s00453-002-0978-1

Related papers

On quantum versus classical query complexity.

Scott Aaronson, Andris Ambainis, Andrej Bogdanov +2 more

Electronic colloquium on computational complexity•Jan 1, 2021•2 citations

What is the largest separation between quantum and classical query complexity?

Shao-Ming Fei

中国科学通报:英文版•Jun 13, 2017•0 citations

Two classical queries versus one quantum query

Joris W. M. van Dam

•Jan 1, 1998•3 citations

Enlarging the gap between quantum and classical query complexity of multifunctions

Alina Vasilieva, Elena Shishova, Taisia Mischenko-Slatenkova

Quantum computing aims to use quantum mechanical effects for the efficient performance of computational tasks. A popular research direction is enlarging the gap between classical and quantum algorithm complexity of the same computational problem. We present new results in quantum query algorithm design for multivalued functions that allow to achieve a large quantum versus classical complexity separation. To compute a basic finite multifunction in a quantum model only one query is enough while classically three queries are required. Then, we present two generalizations and a modification of the original algorithm, and obtain the following complexity gaps: QUD(M') ≤ N versus CUD(M') ≥ 3N, and QRD(M'') = 1 versus N/2 + 1 ≤ CRD(M'') ≤ N.

International Conference on Natural Computation (ICNC)•Jul 1, 2013•0 citations

Nonadaptive quantum query complexity

Ashley Montanaro

Information Processing Letters•Sep 22, 2010•14 citations

Forrelation: A Problem That Optimally Separates Quantum from Classical Computing

Scott Aaronson, Andris Ambainis

We achieve essentially the largest possible separation between quantum and classical query complexities. We do so using a property-testing problem called Forrelation, where one needs to decide whether one Boolean function is highly correlated with the Fourier transform of a second function. This problem can be solved using 1 quantum query, yet we show that any randomized algorithm needs $\Omega(\sqrt{N}/\log N)$ queries (improving an $\Omega(N^{1/4})$ lower bound of Aaronson). Conversely, we show that this 1 versus $\widetilde{\Omega}(\sqrt{N})$ separation is optimal: indeed, any $t$-query quantum algorithm whatsoever can be simulated by an $O(N^{1-1/2t})$-query randomized algorithm. Thus, resolving an open question of Buhrman et al. [ SIAM J. Comput., 37 (2008), pp. 1387--1400] from 2002, there is no partial Boolean function whose quantum query complexity is constant and whose randomized query complexity is linear. We conjecture that a natural generalization of Forrelation achieves the optimal $t$ versus $\Omega(N^{1-1/2t})$ separation for all $t$. As a bonus, we show that this generalization is ${BQP}$-complete. This yields what is arguably the simplest ${BQP}$-complete problem yet known and gives a second sense in which Forrelation “captures the maximum power of quantum computation.”

arXiv:1411.5729•SIAM Journal on Computing•Jan 1, 2018•53 citations
Quantum computing aims to use quantum mechanical effects for the efficient performance of computational tasks. A popular research direction is enlarging the gap between classical and quantum algorithm complexity of the same computational problem. We present new results in quantum query algorithm design for multivalued functions that allow to achieve a large quantum versus classical complexity separation. To compute a basic finite multifunction in a quantum model only one query is enough while classically three queries are required. Then, we present two generalizations and a modification of the original algorithm, and obtain the following complexity gaps: QUD(M') ≤ N versus CUD(M') ≥ 3N, and QRD(M'') = 1 versus N/2 + 1 ≤ CRD(M'') ≤ N.
We achieve essentially the largest possible separation between quantum and classical query complexities. We do so using a property-testing problem called Forrelation, where one needs to decide whether one Boolean function is highly correlated with the Fourier transform of a second function. This problem can be solved using 1 quantum query, yet we show that any randomized algorithm needs Ω(N/log⁡N)\Omega(\sqrt{N}/\log N)Ω(N​/logN) queries (improving an Ω(N1/4)\Omega(N^{1/4})Ω(N1/4) lower bound of Aaronson). Conversely, we show that this 1 versus Ω~(N)\widetilde{\Omega}(\sqrt{N})Ω(N​) separation is optimal: indeed, any ttt-query quantum algorithm whatsoever can be simulated by an O(N1−1/2t)O(N^{1-1/2t})O(N1−1/2t)-query randomized algorithm. Thus, resolving an open question of Buhrman et al. [ SIAM J. Comput., 37 (2008), pp. 1387--1400] from 2002, there is no partial Boolean function whose quantum query complexity is constant and whose randomized query complexity is linear. We conjecture that a natural generalization of Forrelation achieves the optimal ttt versus Ω(N1−1/2t)\Omega(N^{1-1/2t})Ω(N1−1/2t) separation for all ttt. As a bonus, we show that this generalization is BQP{BQP}BQP-complete. This yields what is arguably the simplest BQP{BQP}BQP-complete problem yet known and gives a second sense in which Forrelation “captures the maximum power of quantum computation.”