We show that information-theoretically secure key agreement and quantum distillation are strongly related. This leads to new evidence for the existence of bound information, i.e. correlated information not useful for the generation of a secret key.
One big problem of the communication between two parties is the secrecy. That means how\nmuch information a third party can obtain by intercepting the messages transmitted from\none honest party to the other one. Therefore cryptography offers a wide range of protocols\nto ensure security with assumptions on the eavesdropper. So one was looking for an\ninformation-theoretical description of the scenario to get unconditional secure communication.\nIn this scenario we are considering two honest parties that want to communicate over\nan authenticated channel that the eavesdropper is wiretapping. This scenario introduced the definition of the intrinsic information and the secret-key rate which are a measure of the secrecy in this setting. Later because of strong analogies to quantum mechanics it turned out that this description was lacking a phenomena called bound information which is the disability of a probability distribution to create a secret-key even though it has predicted secrecy.\nNearly ten years of research have shown the existence of bound information for the multipartite case where several parties are communicating but not yet for the bipartite case.\nHence the approach of non-distillability seems a very promising one to find this conjecture.\nMotivated by this the approach we implemented this tool and simulated some distributions that have conjectured bound information. Thereby we improved the tool to reduce its calculationtime and to get closer to the aim.
It was recently pointed out that there is a close connection between information-theoretic key agreement and quantum entanglement purification. This suggests that the concept of bound entanglement (entanglement which cannot be purified) has a classical counterpart: bound information, which cannot be used to generate a secret key by any protocol. We analyse a probability distribution which results when a specific bound entangled quantum state is measured. We show strong evidence for the fact that the corresponding mutual information is indeed bound. The probable existence of such information stands in contrast to previous beliefs in classical information theory. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
It is shown that (i) all entangled states can be mapped by single-copy measurements into probability distributions containing secret correlations, and (ii) if a probability distribution obtained from a quantum state contains secret correlations, then this state has to be entangled. These results prove the existence of a two-way connection between secret and quantum correlations in the process of preparation. They also imply that either it is possible to map any bound entangled state into a distillable probability distribution or bipartite bound information exists.
Non-additivity is one of the distinctive traits of Quantum Information Theory: the combined use of quantum objects may be more advantageous than the sum of their individual uses. Non-additivity effects have been proven, for example, for quantum channel capacities, entanglement distillation or state estimation. In this work, we consider whether non-additivity effects can be found in Classical Information Theory. We work in the secret-key agreement scenario in which two honest parties, having access to correlated classical data that are also correlated to an eavesdropper, aim at distilling a secret key. Exploiting the analogies between the entanglement and the secret-key agreement scenario, we provide some evidence that the secret-key rate may be a non-additive quantity. In particular, we show that correlations with conjectured bound information become secret-key distillable when combined. Our results constitute a new instance of the subtle relation between the entanglement and secret-key agreement scenario.