In this paper, by using the nonlinear coherent states approach, we find a relation between the geometric structure of the physical space and the geometry of the corresponding projective Hilbert space. To illustrate the approach, we explore the quantum transition probability and the geometric phase in the curved space.
This manuscript explores the Riemannian geometry of quantum state manifolds and its physical implications. We establish that quantum state manifolds, as submanifolds of Hilbert space, possess intrinsic Riemannian geometry characterized by a metric tensor derived from the Hilbert space inner product. This geometric framework reveals fundamental connections: the distance between nearby states scales with quantum fluctuations, curvature indicates state robustness, and geometric phase transitions occur in many-body systems. We review historical developments from early quantum geometry to modern quantum information geometry, and present methodologies for computing geometric quantities and their physical interpretations. Results include distance-fluctuation relations for coherent states, curvature calculations for SU(2) manifolds, and applications to quantum optimization and metrology via the quantum Fisher information metric. The discussion interprets geometric quantities in terms of uncertainty principles, state robustness, and quantum criticality, while outlining future research directions in quantum chaos-geometry correlations, non-associative geometry, and geometric quantum algorithm design. We conclude that Riemannian geometry provides a powerful framework for understanding and exploiting the structure of quantum state space, with applications across quantum information processing, metrology, and foundational physics.
A mapping is established in connecting density matrices, associated with an evolution of a quantum open system, with vector ray in a complex projective Hilbert space. By using the corresponding vector ray to represent the open two-level system, we may observe the geometric phase for the open two-level system. The geometric phase of the open two-level system depends only on the smooth (open or closed) curve in the complex projective Hilbert space of ray, which is formulated entirely in terms of geometric structures on this space.
In this paper, by using the Wess–Zumino formalism of noncommutative differential calculus, we show that the concept of nonlinear coherent states originates from noncommutative geometry. For this purpose, we first formulate the differential calculus on a GL p, q(2) quantum plane. By using the commutation relations between coordinates and their interior derivatives, we then construct the two-parameter (p, q)-deformed quantum phase space together with the associated deformed Heisenberg commutation relations. Finally, by applying the obtained results for the quantum harmonic oscillator we construct the associated coherent states, which can be identified as nonlinear coherent states. Furthermore, we show that some of the well-known deformed (nonlinear) coherent states, such as two-parameter (p, q)-deformed coherent states, Maths-type q-deformed coherent states, Phys-type q-deformed coherent states and Quesne deformed coherent states, can be easily obtained from our treatment.
A geometric framework for quantum mechanics arose during the mid 1970s when authors such as Cantoni explored the notion of generalized transition probabilities, and Kibble promoted the idea that the space of pure quantum states provides a natural quantum mechanical analogue for classical phase space. This central idea can be seen easily since the projection of Schrödinger's equation from a Hilbert space into the space of pure spaces is a set of Hamilton's equations. Over the intervening years considerable work has been carried out by a variety of authors and a mature description of quantum mechanics in geometric terms has emerged with many applications. This current offering would seem ideally placed to review the last thirty years of progress and relate this to the most recent work in quantum entanglement. Bengtsson and Zyczkowski's beautifully illustrated volume, Geometry of Quantum States (referred to as GQS from now on) attempts to cover considerable ground in its 466 pages. Its topics range from colour theory in Chapter 1 to quantum entanglement in Chapter 15—to say that this is a whirlwind tour is, perhaps, no understatement. The use of the work 'introduction' in the subtitle of GQS , might suggest to the reader that this work be viewed as a textbook and I think that this interpretation would be incorrect. The authors have chosen to present a survey of different topics with the specific aim to introduce entanglement in geometric terms—the book is not intended as a pedagogical introduction to the geometric approach to quantum mechanics. Each of the fifteen chapters is a short, and mostly self-contained, essay on a particular aspect or application of geometry in the context of quantum mechanics with entanglement being addressed specifically in the final chapter. The chapters fall into three classifications: those concerned with the mathematical background, those which discuss quantum theory and the foundational aspects of the geometric framework, and applications of the geometric approach. The first four chapters contain the standard mathematics required to understand the rest of the material presented: specific areas in colour theory, set theory, probability theory, differential geometry and projective geometry are all covered with an eye to the material that follows. Chapter 5 starts the first real discussion of quantum theory in GQS and serves as an elegant, succinct introduction to the geometry which underlies quantum theory. This may be the most worthwhile chapter for the casual reader who wants to understand the key ideas in this field. Chapter 6 builds on the discussion in Chapter 5, introducing a group theoretic approach to understand coherent states and Chapter 7 describes a geometric tool in the form of an approach to complex projective geometry called 'the stellar representation'. Chapter 8 returns to a more purely quantum mechanical discussion as the authors turn to study the space of density matrices. This chapter completes the discussion which started in Chapter 5. Chapter 9 begins the part of the book concerned with applications of the geometric approach. From this point on the book aims, specifically, to prepare the reader for the material in Chapter 15 beginning with a discussion on the purification of mixed quantum states. In the succeeding chapters a definite choice has been made to present a geometric approach to certain quantum information problems. For example, Chapter 10 contains an extremely well formulated discussion of measurement and positive operator-valued measures with several well illustrated examples and Chapter 11 reopens the discussion of density matrices. Entropy and majorization are again revisited in Chapter 12 in much greater detail than in previous chapters. Chapters 13 and 14 concern themselves with a discussion of various metrics and their relation to the problem of distinguishing between probability distributions and their suitability as probability measures.
In this paper, the projective geometry is used to describe the features of spherical manifold and discreteness in quantum evolution. As a system evolves in time the state vector changes and it traces out a curve in Hilbert space. Geometrically, the evolution is represented as a closed curve in the projective Hilbert space. In recent times many attempts have been made to describe 'length', 'distance', and 'geometric phases' and also 'parallel transport'and symplectic geometry in various ways in the projective Hilbert space, during quantum evolution. It is shown in this paper that for the quantum evolution in ray space, spherical manifold and features of discreteness can be described geometrically.