Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

The Bare Bounded-Storage Model: The Tight Bound on the Storage Requirement for Key Agreement

Stefan Dziembowski, Ueli M. Maurer

Published May 29, 2008• 13 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In the bounded-storage model (BSM) for information-theoretic secure encryption and key agreement, one makes use of a random string whose length is greater than the assumed bound on the adversary Eve's storage capacity. The legitimate parties, Alice and Bob, execute a protocol, over an authenticated channel accessible to Eve, to generate a secret key about which Eve has essentially no information even if she has infinite computing power. The string is either assumed to be accessible to all parties or communicated publicly from Alice to Bob. While in the BSM one often assumes that Alice and Bob initially share a short secret key, and the goal of the protocol is to generate a much longer key, in this communication, we consider the bare BSM without any initially shared secret key. It is proved that in the bare BSM, secret key agreement is impossible unless Alice and Bob have themselves very high storage capacity, namely, . This proves the optimality of a scheme proposed by Cachin and Maurer.

DOI
10.1109/tit.2008.921864

Related papers

Tight security proofs for the bounded-storage model

Stefan Dziembowski, Ueli M. Maurer

In the bounded-storage model for information-theoretically secure encryption and key-agreement one can prove the security of a cipher based on the sole assumption that the adversary's storage capacity is bounded, say by s bits, even if her computational power is unlimited. Assume that a random t-bit string R is either publicly available (e.g. the signal of a deep space radio source) or broadcast by one of the legitimate parties. If s < t, the adversary can store only partial information about R. The legitimate sender Alice and receiver Bob, sharing a short secret key K initially, can therefore potentially generate a very long n-bit one-time pad X with n jKj about which the adversary has essentially no information, thus at rst glance apparently contradicting Shannon's bound on the key size of a perfect cipher.

ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC)•May 19, 2002•53 citations

Tight security proofs for the bounded-storage model

Stefan Dziembowski, Ueli M. Maurer

(MATH) In the bounded-storage model for information-theoretically secure encryption and key-agreement one can prove the security of a cipher based on the sole assumption that the adversary's storage capacity is bounded, say by s bits, even if her computational power is unlimited. Assume that a random t-bit string R is either publicly available (e.g. the signal of a deep space radio source) or broadcast by one of the legitimate parties. If s$xi;t, the adversary can store only partial information about R. The legitimate sender Alice and receiver Bob, sharing a short secret key K initially, can therefore potentially generate a very long n-bit one-time pad X with n»|K| about which the adversary has essentially no information, thus at first glance apparently contradicting Shannon's bound on the key size of a perfect cipher.All previous results in the bounded-storage model were partial or far from optimal, for one of the following reasons: either the secret key K had in fact to be longer than the derived one-time pad, or t had to be extremely large (tρns), or the adversary was assumed to be able to store only actual bits of R rather than arbitrary s bits of information about R, or the adversary could obtain a non-negligible amount of information about X.In this paper we prove the first non-restricted security result in the bounded-storage model, exploiting the full potential of the model: K is short, X is very long (e.g. gigabytes), t needs to be only moderately larger than s, and the security proof is optimally strong. In fact, we prove that s/t can be arbitrarily close to 1 and hence the storage bound is essentially optimal.

ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC)•Jan 1, 2002•8 citations

On the Semantic Security in the General Bounded Storage Model: A New Proof

Mohammad Moltafet, Hamid R. Sadjadpour, Zouheir Rezki

In the bounded storage model introduced by Maurer, the adversary is computationally unbounded and has a bounded storage capacity. In this model, perfect secrecy is guaranteed by using a publicly available random string whose length is larger than the adversary storage capacity. The protocol proposed by Maurer is simple, from the perspective of implementation, and efficient, from the perspective of the initial secret key size and random string length. However, he provided the proof of the security for the case where the adversary can access a constant fraction of the random string and store onlyoriginal bitsof the random string. In this paper, we provide a new proof of the security of the protocol proposed by Maurer for the general bounded storage model, i.e., the adversary can access all bits of the random string, and store the output of any Boolean function on the string. We reaffirm that the protocol isabsolutely semantically securein the general bounded storage model.

arXiv:2403.18935•IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security•Jan 1, 2024•2 citations

A Capacity-achieving One-message Key Agreement With Finite Blocklength Analysis

Setareh Sharifian, Alireza Poostindouz, Reihaneh Safavi–Naini

Information-theoretic secret key agreement (SKA) protocols are a fundamental cryptographic primitive that are used to establish a shared secret key between two or more parties. In a two-party SKA in source model, Alice and Bob have samples of two correlated variables, that are partially leaked to Eve, and their goal is to establish a shared secret key by communicating over a reliable public channel. Eve must have no information about the established key. In this paper, we study the problem of one-message secret key agreement where the key is established by Alice sending a single message to Bob. We propose a one-message SKA (OM-SKA) protocol, prove that it achieves the one-way secret key capacity, and derive finite blocklength approximations of the achievable secret key length. We compare our results with existing OM-SKAs and show the protocol has a unique combination of desirable properties.

arXiv:1905.04280•May 10, 2019•1 citation

Information-Theoretic Secret-Key Agreement: The Asymptotically Tight Relation Between the Secret-Key Rate and the Channel Quality Ratio.

Daniel Jost, Ueli M. Maurer, João Ribeiro

Information-theoretic secret-key agreement between two parties Alice and Bob is a well-studied problem that is provably impossible in a plain model with public (authenticated) communication, but is known to be possible in a model where the parties also have access to some correlated randomness. One particular type of such correlated randomness is the so-called satellite setting, where uniform random bits (e.g., sent by a satellite) are received by the parties and the adversary Eve over inherently noisy channels. The antenna size determines the error probability, and the antenna is the adversary’s limiting resource much as computing power is the limiting resource in traditional complexity-based security. The natural assumption about the adversary is that her antenna is at most Q times larger than both Alice’s and Bob’s antenna, where, to be realistic, Q can be very large.

•Jan 1, 2017•0 citations

A Capacity-achieving One-way Key Agreement with Improved Finite Blocklength Analysis

Setareh Sharifian, Alireza Poostindouz, Reihaneh Safavi–Naini

Information-theoretic secret key agreement (SKA) protocols are a fundamental cryptographic primitive that are used to establish a shared secret key between two or more parties. In a two-party SKA in source model, Alice and Bob have samples of two correlated variables that are partially leaked to Eve, and their goal is to establish a shared secret key by communicating over a reliable public channel. Eve must have no information about the established key. In this paper, we study the problem of one-way secret key agreement where the key is established by Alice sending a public message to Bob. We propose a one-way SKA (OW-SKA) protocol, prove that it achieves the one-way secret key capacity, and use it to derive a finite blocklength bound on the achievable secret key length. We compare our results with existing OW-SKAs and show the protocol achieves a longer key, and has a combination of desirable properties.

International Symposium on Information Theory and its Applications•Oct 24, 2020•6 citations
In the bounded-storage model (BSM) for information-theoretic secure encryption and key agreement, one makes use of a random string whose length is greater than the assumed bound on the adversary Eve's storage capacity. The legitimate parties, Alice and Bob, execute a protocol, over an authenticated channel accessible to Eve, to generate a secret key about which Eve has essentially no information even if she has infinite computing power. The string is either assumed to be accessible to all parties or communicated publicly from Alice to Bob. While in the BSM one often assumes that Alice and Bob initially share a short secret key, and the goal of the protocol is to generate a much longer key, in this communication, we consider the bare BSM without any initially shared secret key. It is proved that in the bare BSM, secret key agreement is impossible unless Alice and Bob have themselves very high storage capacity, namely, . This proves the optimality of a scheme proposed by Cachin and Maurer.
In the bounded-storage model for information-theoretically secure encryption and key-agreement one can prove the security of a cipher based on the sole assumption that the adversary's storage capacity is bounded, say by s bits, even if her computational power is unlimited. Assume that a random t-bit string R is either publicly available (e.g. the signal of a deep space radio source) or broadcast by one of the legitimate parties. If s < t, the adversary can store only partial information about R. The legitimate sender Alice and receiver Bob, sharing a short secret key K initially, can therefore potentially generate a very long n-bit one-time pad X with n jKj about which the adversary has essentially no information, thus at rst glance apparently contradicting Shannon's bound on the key size of a perfect cipher.
(MATH) In the bounded-storage model for information-theoretically secure encryption and key-agreement one can prove the security of a cipher based on the sole assumption that the adversary's storage capacity is bounded, say by s bits, even if her computational power is unlimited. Assume that a random t-bit string R is either publicly available (e.g. the signal of a deep space radio source) or broadcast by one of the legitimate parties. If s$xi;t, the adversary can store only partial information about R. The legitimate sender Alice and receiver Bob, sharing a short secret key K initially, can therefore potentially generate a very long n-bit one-time pad X with n»|K| about which the adversary has essentially no information, thus at first glance apparently contradicting Shannon's bound on the key size of a perfect cipher.All previous results in the bounded-storage model were partial or far from optimal, for one of the following reasons: either the secret key K had in fact to be longer than the derived one-time pad, or t had to be extremely large (tρns), or the adversary was assumed to be able to store only actual bits of R rather than arbitrary s bits of information about R, or the adversary could obtain a non-negligible amount of information about X.In this paper we prove the first non-restricted security result in the bounded-storage model, exploiting the full potential of the model: K is short, X is very long (e.g. gigabytes), t needs to be only moderately larger than s, and the security proof is optimally strong. In fact, we prove that s/t can be arbitrarily close to 1 and hence the storage bound is essentially optimal.
In the bounded storage model introduced by Maurer, the adversary is computationally unbounded and has a bounded storage capacity. In this model, perfect secrecy is guaranteed by using a publicly available random string whose length is larger than the adversary storage capacity. The protocol proposed by Maurer is simple, from the perspective of implementation, and efficient, from the perspective of the initial secret key size and random string length. However, he provided the proof of the security for the case where the adversary can access a constant fraction of the random string and store onlyoriginal bitsof the random string. In this paper, we provide a new proof of the security of the protocol proposed by Maurer for the general bounded storage model, i.e., the adversary can access all bits of the random string, and store the output of any Boolean function on the string. We reaffirm that the protocol isabsolutely semantically securein the general bounded storage model.
Information-theoretic secret key agreement (SKA) protocols are a fundamental cryptographic primitive that are used to establish a shared secret key between two or more parties. In a two-party SKA in source model, Alice and Bob have samples of two correlated variables, that are partially leaked to Eve, and their goal is to establish a shared secret key by communicating over a reliable public channel. Eve must have no information about the established key. In this paper, we study the problem of one-message secret key agreement where the key is established by Alice sending a single message to Bob. We propose a one-message SKA (OM-SKA) protocol, prove that it achieves the one-way secret key capacity, and derive finite blocklength approximations of the achievable secret key length. We compare our results with existing OM-SKAs and show the protocol has a unique combination of desirable properties.
Information-theoretic secret-key agreement between two parties Alice and Bob is a well-studied problem that is provably impossible in a plain model with public (authenticated) communication, but is known to be possible in a model where the parties also have access to some correlated randomness. One particular type of such correlated randomness is the so-called satellite setting, where uniform random bits (e.g., sent by a satellite) are received by the parties and the adversary Eve over inherently noisy channels. The antenna size determines the error probability, and the antenna is the adversary’s limiting resource much as computing power is the limiting resource in traditional complexity-based security. The natural assumption about the adversary is that her antenna is at most Q times larger than both Alice’s and Bob’s antenna, where, to be realistic, Q can be very large.
Information-theoretic secret key agreement (SKA) protocols are a fundamental cryptographic primitive that are used to establish a shared secret key between two or more parties. In a two-party SKA in source model, Alice and Bob have samples of two correlated variables that are partially leaked to Eve, and their goal is to establish a shared secret key by communicating over a reliable public channel. Eve must have no information about the established key. In this paper, we study the problem of one-way secret key agreement where the key is established by Alice sending a public message to Bob. We propose a one-way SKA (OW-SKA) protocol, prove that it achieves the one-way secret key capacity, and use it to derive a finite blocklength bound on the achievable secret key length. We compare our results with existing OW-SKAs and show the protocol achieves a longer key, and has a combination of desirable properties.