Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics

Experimental phase detection at the quantum limit with coherent state interferometry

Juan F. Hodelin, G. Khoury, Luca Pezzè, Augusto Smerzi, Dirk Bouwmeester

Published May 1, 2008• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We experimentally demonstrate phase sensitivity at the standard quantum limit independent of phase using Bayesian phase estimation. This technique is unbiased and saturates the Cramer-Rao lower bound representing the optimum technique using coherent states.
DOI
10.1109/cleo.2008.4552052

Related papers

Phase Detection at the Quantum Limit with Multiphoton Mach-Zehnder Interferometry

Luca Pezzè, Augusto Smerzi, G. Khoury +2 more

We study a Mach-Zehnder interferometer fed by a coherent state in one input port and vacuum in the other. We explore a Bayesian phase estimation strategy to demonstrate that it is possible to achieve the standard quantum limit independently from the true value of the phase shift and specific assumptions on the noise of the interferometer. We have been able to implement the protocol by using parallel operation of two photon-number-resolving detectors and multiphoton coincidence logic electronics at the output ports of a weakly illuminated Mach-Zehnder interferometer. This protocol is unbiased, saturates the Cramer-Rao phase uncertainty bound, and, therefore, is an optimal phase estimation strategy.

arXiv:quant-ph/0701158•Physical Review Letters•Nov 27, 2007•135 citations

Mach-Zehnder Interferometry at the Heisenberg Limit with Coherent and Squeezed-Vacuum Light

Luca Pezzè, Augusto Smerzi

We show that the phase sensitivity $\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\theta}$ of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer illuminated by a coherent state in one input port and a squeezed-vacuum state in the other port is (i) independent of the true value of the phase shift and (ii) can reach the Heisenberg limit $\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\theta}\ensuremath{\sim}1/{N}_{T}$, where ${N}_{T}$ is the average number of input particles. We also demonstrate that the Cramer-Rao lower bound of phase sensitivity, $\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\theta}\ensuremath{\sim}\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}1/\sqrt{|\ensuremath{\alpha}{|}^{2}{e}^{2r}+{sinh}^{2}r}$, can be saturated for arbitrary values of the squeezing parameter $r$ and the amplitude of the coherent mode $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ by using a Bayesian phase inference protocol.

arXiv:0705.4631•Physical Review Letters•Feb 19, 2008•359 citations

Frequentist and Bayesian Quantum Phase Estimation

Yan Li, Luca Pezzè, Manuel Gessner +3 more

Frequentist and Bayesian phase estimation strategies lead to conceptually different results on the state of knowledge about the true value of an unknown parameter. We compare the two frameworks and their sensitivity bounds to the estimation of an interferometric phase shift limited by quantum noise, considering both the cases of a fixed and a fluctuating parameter. We point out that frequentist precision bounds, such as the Cramér-Rao bound, for instance, do not apply to Bayesian strategies and vice versa. In particular, we show that the Bayesian variance can overcome the frequentist Cramér-Rao bound, which appears to be a paradoxical result if the conceptual difference between the two approaches are overlooked. Similarly, bounds for fluctuating parameters make no statement about the estimation of a fixed parameter.

arXiv:1804.10048•Entropy•Aug 23, 2018•68 citations

Phase estimation with two-mode squeezed vacuum and parity detection: Bayesian analysis

Keith R. Motes, Petr M. Anisimov, Jonathan P. Dowling

A recently proposed phase-estimation protocol that is based on measuring the parity of a two-mode squeezed-vacuum state at the output of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer shows that Cramer-Rao bound sensitivity can be obtained [P. M. Anisimov, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf104}, 103602 (2010)]. This sensitivity, however, is expected in the case of an infinite number of parity measurements made on an infinite number of photons. Here we consider the case of a finite number of parity measurements and a finite number of photons, implemented with photon-number-resolving detectors. We use Bayesian analysis to characterize the sensitivity of the phase estimation in this scheme. We have found that our phase estimation becomes biased near 0 or $\pi/2$ phase values. Yet there is an in-between region where the bias becomes negligible. In this region, our phase estimation scheme saturates the Cramer-Rao bound and beats the shot-noise limit.

arXiv:1110.1587•Civil War Book Review•Oct 7, 2011•1 citation

Quantum Cramer-Rao bound and parity measurement

Aravind Chiruvelli, Hwang Lee

We show, by using parity detection, that the phase estimate obtained from the linear error propagation formula, indeed saturates the lower bound set by maximizing quantum Fisher information for several of the well-known states, proposed for the Heisenberg limited interferometry. Our results show that one can achieve the quantum Cram´er-Rao bound, by simply counting the number of photons which is not very far from actual realization.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Feb 8, 2010•2 citations

Phase estimation at the quantum Cramér-Rao bound via parity detection

Kaushik Parasuram Seshadreesan, Sejong Kim, Jonathan P. Dowling +1 more

We show that, in two-path optical interferometry, the measurement of photon number parity achieves maximal phase sensitivity at the quantum Cram\'er-Rao bound for a certain type of path-symmetric states. All pure states of light proposed for sub--shot-noise phase sensitivity thus far in the literature are of the form of these path-symmetric states. Thus, parity measurement presents an optimal detection strategy for all of them. Our scheme is applicable for local phase estimation.

arXiv:1207.0494•Physical Review A•Apr 25, 2013•93 citations
We study a Mach-Zehnder interferometer fed by a coherent state in one input port and vacuum in the other. We explore a Bayesian phase estimation strategy to demonstrate that it is possible to achieve the standard quantum limit independently from the true value of the phase shift and specific assumptions on the noise of the interferometer. We have been able to implement the protocol by using parallel operation of two photon-number-resolving detectors and multiphoton coincidence logic electronics at the output ports of a weakly illuminated Mach-Zehnder interferometer. This protocol is unbiased, saturates the Cramer-Rao phase uncertainty bound, and, therefore, is an optimal phase estimation strategy.
We show that the phase sensitivity $\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\theta}$ of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer illuminated by a coherent state in one input port and a squeezed-vacuum state in the other port is (i) independent of the true value of the phase shift and (ii) can reach the Heisenberg limit $\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\theta}\ensuremath{\sim}1/{N}_{T}$, where NT{N}_{T}NT​ is the average number of input particles. We also demonstrate that the Cramer-Rao lower bound of phase sensitivity, $\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\theta}\ensuremath{\sim}\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}1/\sqrt{|\ensuremath{\alpha}{|}^{2}{e}^{2r}+{sinh}^{2}r}$, can be saturated for arbitrary values of the squeezing parameter rrr and the amplitude of the coherent mode $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ by using a Bayesian phase inference protocol.
Frequentist and Bayesian phase estimation strategies lead to conceptually different results on the state of knowledge about the true value of an unknown parameter. We compare the two frameworks and their sensitivity bounds to the estimation of an interferometric phase shift limited by quantum noise, considering both the cases of a fixed and a fluctuating parameter. We point out that frequentist precision bounds, such as the Cramér-Rao bound, for instance, do not apply to Bayesian strategies and vice versa. In particular, we show that the Bayesian variance can overcome the frequentist Cramér-Rao bound, which appears to be a paradoxical result if the conceptual difference between the two approaches are overlooked. Similarly, bounds for fluctuating parameters make no statement about the estimation of a fixed parameter.
A recently proposed phase-estimation protocol that is based on measuring the parity of a two-mode squeezed-vacuum state at the output of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer shows that Cramer-Rao bound sensitivity can be obtained [P. M. Anisimov, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf104}, 103602 (2010)]. This sensitivity, however, is expected in the case of an infinite number of parity measurements made on an infinite number of photons. Here we consider the case of a finite number of parity measurements and a finite number of photons, implemented with photon-number-resolving detectors. We use Bayesian analysis to characterize the sensitivity of the phase estimation in this scheme. We have found that our phase estimation becomes biased near 0 or π/2\pi/2π/2 phase values. Yet there is an in-between region where the bias becomes negligible. In this region, our phase estimation scheme saturates the Cramer-Rao bound and beats the shot-noise limit.