© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

Fortschritte der Physik

Covariant phase observables

Juha-Pekka Pellonpää

Published Feb 26, 2003• 2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Covariant phase observables constitute a simple solution of the quantum phase problem of a single‐mode optical field. They share three important properties: their range of values is the phase interval [0,2π), they are covariant under shifts generated by the number operator (which is necessary for coherent state phase measurements), and they have the uniform phase distribution in number states. Moreover, some phase observables have been measured (e.g. the phase observable associated to the Q‐function). The canonical phase observable has some additional properties which distinguish it from other covariant phase observables: it generates number shifts, it is uniquely associated to the polar decomposition of the lowering operator (Dirac's idea [1]), it has a projection valued covariant dilation (Newton's extension [2]), and it has a projection valued discretization (the Pegg‐Barnett formalism [3]). The single‐mode covariant phase theory can easily be extended to the two‐mode theory of covariant phase difference observables. Finally, most of all phase theories have connections to the covariant phase theory.

DOI: 10.1002/prop.200310028

Related papers

The Pegg-Barnett Formalism and Covariant Phase Observables

PEKKA J. LAHTI, Juha-Pekka Pellonpää

We compare the Pegg-Barnett (PB) formalism with the covariant phase observable approach to the problem of quantum phase and show that PB-formalism gives essentially the same results as the canonical (covariant) phase observable. We also show that PB-formalism can be extended to cover all covariant phase observables including the covariant phase observable arising from the angle margin of the Husimi Q -function.

arXiv:quant-ph/0106084•Physica Scripta•Jan 1, 2002•17 citations

Unitary and Hermitian phase operators for the electromagnetic field

Yee Kin Tsui, Michael F. Reid

Pegg and Barnett [Phys. Rev. A 39, 1665 (1989)] have proposed a formalism for a Hermitian optical phase operator, constructed from the so-called phase states. In this paper we give an alternative derivation. We begin by defining a unitary phase operator ${e}^{i\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}$ from the relationship $\stackrel{^}{a}={e}^{i\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}R(\stackrel{^}{N})$ ($\stackrel{^}{a}$ is an annihilation operator for a single-mode boson field), but borrow the idea of a finite- (but arbitrarily large) dimensional space from Pegg and Barnett. Finally, we comment on an experiment to determine quantum phase uncertainty. Our analysis uses the operator ${e}^{i\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}$, which we feel is a more natural choice than $\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}$. The use of ${e}^{i\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}$ also avoids the multivalued problems associated with $\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}$.

Physical Review A•Jul 1, 1992•11 citations

Covariant phase difference observables in quantum mechanics

Teiko Heinonen, PEKKA J. LAHTI, Juha-Pekka Pellonpää

Covariant phase difference observables are determined in two different ways, by a direct computation and by a group theoretical method. A characterization of phase difference observables which can be expressed as the difference of two phase observables is given. The classical limits of such phase difference observables are determined and the Pegg-Barnett phase difference distribution is obtained from the phase difference representation. The relation of Ban’s theory to the covariant phase theories is exhibited.

arXiv:quant-ph/0209101•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jan 17, 2003•6 citations

Wigner function for number and phase

John A. Vaccaro, David Thomas Pegg

Various quasiprobability distributions have been developed in the past using the Hilbert space of the single-mode light field. The development of a quasiprobability distribution associated with a phase operator has previously been impossible because of the absence of a unique Hermitian phase operator defined on the Hilbert space. Recently, however, Pegg and Barnett [Europhys. Lett. 6, 483 (1988); Phys. Rev. A 39, 1665 (1989)] and Barnett and Pegg [J. Mod. Optics 36, 7 (1989)] introduced a new formalism that does allow the construction of a Hermitian phase operator and associated phase eigenstates. In this paper we develop a quasiprobability distribution associated with the number and phase operators of the single-mode light field in the new formalism. The new distribution, which we call the number-phase Wigner function, has properties analogous to the Wigner function. We also derive the number-phase Wigner representation of number states, phase states, general physical states, coherent states, and the squeezed vacuum. We find this new representation has features that are related to the number and phase properties of states. For example, the number-phase Wigner representation of a number state is nonzero only on a circle, while the representation of a phase state is only nonzero along a radial line.

Physical Review A•May 1, 1990•91 citations

Quantum optical phase

David Thomas Pegg, Stephen Mark Barnett

The phase associated with a single mode of the electromagnetic field is complementary to the photon number. This simple idea leads us to construct a probability density for the phase. The phase operator cannot be represented exactly in the usual-infinite Hilbert space but can be constructed in a subspace of it and provides a valid representation of phase if used together with a suitable limiting procedure. We introduce the Hermitian optical phase operator and describe some of its most important properties. We also provide brief discussions of some alternative approaches to the phase problem and to the question of phase measurements. The paper concludes with an extensive bibliography.

Journal of Modern Optics•Feb 1, 1997•63 citations

Phase observables, phase operators and operator orderings

Juha-Pekka Pellonpää

We represent quantum phase observables as phase shift covariant normalized positive operator measures. The phase operators are the first moment operators of the phase observables. A phase operator determines the associated phase observable uniquely. We show that the Cahill–Glauber s -ordered phase operators are determined by phase shift covariant generalized operator measures, which are ordinary operator measures whenever Re s < 0 and phase observables when s ≤ −1. The Wigner–Weyl quantized phase operator is not determined by any phase observable. We investigate the classical limit of covariant (generalized) operator measures in coherent states.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Sep 14, 2001•16 citations

Abstract Covariant phase observables constitute a simple solution of the quantum phase problem of a single‐mode optical field. They share three important properties: their range of values is the phase interval [0,2π), they are covariant under shifts generated by the number operator (which is necessary for coherent state phase measurements), and they have the uniform phase distribution in number states. Moreover, some phase observables have been measured (e.g. the phase observable associated to the Q‐function). The canonical phase observable has some additional properties which distinguish it from other covariant phase observables: it generates number shifts, it is uniquely associated to the polar decomposition of the lowering operator (Dirac's idea [1]), it has a projection valued covariant dilation (Newton's extension [2]), and it has a projection valued discretization (the Pegg‐Barnett formalism [3]). The single‐mode covariant phase theory can easily be extended to the two‐mode theory of covariant phase difference observables. Finally, most of all phase theories have connections to the covariant phase theory.

Pegg and Barnett [Phys. Rev. A 39, 1665 (1989)] have proposed a formalism for a Hermitian optical phase operator, constructed from the so-called phase states. In this paper we give an alternative derivation. We begin by defining a unitary phase operator ${e}^{i\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}$ from the relationship $\stackrel{^}{a}={e}^{i\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}R(\stackrel{^}{N})$ ($\stackrel{^}{a}$ is an annihilation operator for a single-mode boson field), but borrow the idea of a finite- (but arbitrarily large) dimensional space from Pegg and Barnett. Finally, we comment on an experiment to determine quantum phase uncertainty. Our analysis uses the operator ${e}^{i\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}$, which we feel is a more natural choice than $\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}$. The use of ${e}^{i\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}$ also avoids the multivalued problems associated with $\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}$.

Covariant phase difference observables are determined in two different ways, by a direct computation and by a group theoretical method. A characterization of phase difference observables which can be expressed as the difference of two phase observables is given. The classical limits of such phase difference observables are determined and the Pegg-Barnett phase difference distribution is obtained from the phase difference representation. The relation of Ban’s theory to the covariant phase theories is exhibited.

Various quasiprobability distributions have been developed in the past using the Hilbert space of the single-mode light field. The development of a quasiprobability distribution associated with a phase operator has previously been impossible because of the absence of a unique Hermitian phase operator defined on the Hilbert space. Recently, however, Pegg and Barnett [Europhys. Lett. 6, 483 (1988); Phys. Rev. A 39, 1665 (1989)] and Barnett and Pegg [J. Mod. Optics 36, 7 (1989)] introduced a new formalism that does allow the construction of a Hermitian phase operator and associated phase eigenstates. In this paper we develop a quasiprobability distribution associated with the number and phase operators of the single-mode light field in the new formalism. The new distribution, which we call the number-phase Wigner function, has properties analogous to the Wigner function. We also derive the number-phase Wigner representation of number states, phase states, general physical states, coherent states, and the squeezed vacuum. We find this new representation has features that are related to the number and phase properties of states. For example, the number-phase Wigner representation of a number state is nonzero only on a circle, while the representation of a phase state is only nonzero along a radial line.

The phase associated with a single mode of the electromagnetic field is complementary to the photon number. This simple idea leads us to construct a probability density for the phase. The phase operator cannot be represented exactly in the usual-infinite Hilbert space but can be constructed in a subspace of it and provides a valid representation of phase if used together with a suitable limiting procedure. We introduce the Hermitian optical phase operator and describe some of its most important properties. We also provide brief discussions of some alternative approaches to the phase problem and to the question of phase measurements. The paper concludes with an extensive bibliography.

We represent quantum phase observables as phase shift covariant normalized positive operator measures. The phase operators are the first moment operators of the phase observables. A phase operator determines the associated phase observable uniquely. We show that the Cahill–Glauber s -ordered phase operators are determined by phase shift covariant generalized operator measures, which are ordinary operator measures whenever Re s < 0 and phase observables when s ≤ −1. The Wigner–Weyl quantized phase operator is not determined by any phase observable. We investigate the classical limit of covariant (generalized) operator measures in coherent states.