It is pointed out that a mathematical relation exists between cellular automata and quantum field theories. Although the proofs are far from perfect, they do suggest a new look at the origin of quantum mechanics: quantum mechanics may be nothing but a natural way to handle the statistical correlations of a cellular automaton. An essential role for the gravitational force in these considerations is suspected.
It is pointed out that a mathematical relation exists between cellular automata and quantum field theories. Although the proofs are far from perfect, they do suggest a new look at the origin of quantum mechanics: quantum mechanics may be nothing but a natural way to handle the statistical correlations of a cellular automaton. An essential role for the gravitational force in these considerations is suspected.
When investigating theories at the tiniest conceivable scales in nature, almost all researchers today revert to the quantum language, accepting the verdict from the Copenhagen doctrine that the only way to describe what is going on will always involve states in Hilbert space, controlled by operator equations. Returning to classical, that is, non quantum mechanical, descriptions will be forever impossible, unless one accepts some extremely contrived theoretical constructions that may or may not reproduce the quantum mechanical phenomena observed in experiments. Dissatisfied, this author investigated how one can look at things differently. This book is an overview of older material, but also contains many new observations and calculations. Quantum mechanics is looked upon as a tool, not as a theory. Examples are displayed of models that are classical in essence, but can be analysed by the use of quantum techniques, and we argue that even the Standard Model, together with gravitational interactions, might be viewed as a quantum mechanical approach to analyse a system that could be classical at its core. We explain how such thoughts can conceivably be reconciled with Bell's theorem, and how the usual objections voiced against the notion of `superdeterminism' can be overcome, at least in principle. Our proposal would eradicate the collapse problem and the measurement problem. Even the existence of an "arrow of time" can perhaps be explained in a more elegant way than usual. Discussions added in v3: the role of the gravitational force, a mathematical physics definition of free will, and an unconventional view on the arrow of time, amongst others.
When investigating theories at the tiniest conceivable scales in nature,
quantum logic is taking over from logic in the minds of almost
all researchers today. Dissatisfied, the author investigated how one can look
at things differently. This report is an overview of older material, but also
contains many new observations and calculations. Quantum mechanics is looked
upon as a tool, not as a theory. Examples are displayed of models that are
classical in essence, but can be analysed by the use of quantum techniques, and
we argue that even the Standard Model, together with gravitational
interactions, may be viewed as a quantum mechanical approach to analyse a
system that could be classical at its core. We then explain how these
apparently heretic thoughts can be reconciled with Bell's theorem and the usual
objections voiced against the notion of 'super determinism'. Our proposal would
eradicate the collapse problem and the measurement problem.
The mathematical description of quantum systems univocally identies their nature. In other words we treat a system as quantum if we describe its behaviour adopting Hilbert spaces and structures thereof, as prescribed by the postulates of quantum theory. The choice of using quantum systems as the elementary systems of physics can be justied in terms of informational principles, thanks to results of the last decade. Such results come as the conclusion of a research program that lasted almost one century, with the aim of reformulating quantum theory in terms of operational principles. This achievement now poses a new challenge, that we face here. If the systems of quantum theory are thought of as elementary information carriers in the rst place, rather than elementary constituents of matter, and their connections are logical connections within a given algorithm, rather than space-time relations, then we need to nd the origin of mechanical concepts—that characterise quantum mechanics as a theory of physical systems. To this end,we will illustrate howphysical laws can be viewed as algorithms for the update of memory registers that make a physical system. Imposing the characteristic properties of physical laws to such an algorithm, i.e. homogeneity, reversibility and isotropy, we will show that the physical laws thus selected are particular algorithms known as cellular automata. Further assumptions regarding maximal simplicity of the algorithm lead to two cellular automata only, that in a suitable regime can be described by Weyl’s dierential equations, lying at the basis of the dynamics of relativistic quantum elds. We will nally discuss how the same cellular automaton can give rise to both Fermionic eld dynamics and to Maxwell’s equations, that rule the dynamics of the electromagnetic eld. We will conclude reviewing the discussion of the relativity principle, that must be suitably adapted to the scenario where space-time is not an elementary notion, through the denition of a change of inertial reference frame, and whose formulation leads to the recovery of the symmetry of Minkowski space-time, identied with Poincar´e’s group. Space-time thus emerges as one of the manifestations of physical laws, rather than the background where they occur, and its features are determined by the dynamics of systems, necessarily equipped with dierential equations that express it. In brief, there is no space-time unless an evolution rule requires it.
We give the definitive proof that the Dirac Quantum Cellular Automaton (QCA) used for both quantum simulation and algorithmic foundations of Quantum Field Theory (QFT), and especially of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED), as put forward in References https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-019-2555-4 and https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-11-08-1179, does exhibit Fermion Doubling (FD), albeit thrice as less severe as discrete-time standard Lattice Gauge Theories (LGTs) [arXiv:2505.0790], which are naive regarding the spacetime discretization of differential operators acting on fermionic fields. The proof is done for the (1 + 1)D Dirac-QCA model. We show that the (one-time-step) two-point correlation function, also called Green's function (GF), of the Dirac QCA, is of astonishing simplicity, which is in contrast with the GF of the Dirac equation. We also compare, both qualitatively and quantitatively, this Dirac QCA to the continuous-time-LGT spatial discretization of Dirac fermions regarding how well these two lattice models approximate their naive continuum limit$\unicode{x2014}$which is nothing but the Dirac equation$\unicode{x2014}$even when far away from that limit, a situation which must be considered because of experimental limitations in quantum simulation: the Dirac QCA is better for ultrarelativistic regimes, whereas continuous-time LGT is better for non-relativistic regimes. Then, we compute the GF of the FD-fixed model put forward in the last cited reference, called Flavored Dirac QCA (FDQCA)$\unicode{x2014}$which staggers an extra, artificial flavor only, on a diamond spacetime lattice, and does not stagger chirality as staggered fermions in usual LGT. The structure of this FDQCA two-point correlation function is of extreme simplicity, and can be expressed in a very simple manner in terms of the four chiral components of the FD-suffering, original-model GF.