Following homogeneous canonical formalism where the time is treated on an equal footing with the space coordinates, we propose an alternative formulation of quantum mechanics in which the time is considered as a dynamical variable. The basic equation corresponding to and being equivalent to the ordinary Schrödinger equation is obtained when we consider the space coordinates x as a parameter corresponding to the time t in the ordinary formulation. The formal solution of this equation is given and examined. By making use of this solution the scattering theory is formulated in our formalism. It is shown that observables corresponding to the time and space coordinates can be defined. A short comment on the energy-time uncertainty relation is also given.
Following homogeneous canonical formalism where the time is treated on an equal footing with the space coordinates, we propose an alternative formulation of quantum mechanics in which the time is considered as a dynamical variable. The basic equation corresponding to and being equivalent to the ordinary Schrödinger equation is obtained when we consider the space coordinates x as a parameter corresponding to the time t in the ordinary formulation. The formal solution of this equation is given and examined. By making use of this solution the scattering theory is formulated in our formalism. It is shown that observables corresponding to the time and space coordinates can be defined. A short comment on the energy-time uncertainty relation is also given.
W Pauli pointed out that the existence of a self-adjoint time operator is incompatible with the semi-bounded character of the Hamiltonian spectrum. As a result, there has been much argument about the time–energy uncertainty relation and other related issues. In this paper, we show a way to overcome Pauli's argument. In order to define a time operator, by treating time and space on an equal footing and extending the usual Hamiltonian Ĥ to the generalized Hamiltonian Ĥ μ (with Ĥ 0 = Ĥ), we reconstruct the analytical mechanics and the corresponding quantum (field) theories, which are equivalent to the traditional ones. The generalized Schrödinger equation i∂ μ ψ = Ĥ μ ψ and Heisenberg equation d /d x μ = ∂ μ + i[Ĥ μ , ] are obtained, from which we have: (1) t is to Ĥ 0 as x j is to Ĥ j ( j = 1, 2, 3); likewise, t is to i∂ 0 as x j is to i∂ j ; (2) the proposed time operator is canonically conjugate to i∂ 0 rather than to Ĥ 0 , therefore Pauli's theorem no longer applies; (3) two types of uncertainty relations, the usual Δ x μ Δ p μ ≥ 1/2 and the Mandelstam–Tamm treatment Δ x μ Δ H μ ≥ 1/2, have been formulated.
We consider quantum mechanics for which the system time is one of generalized coordinates. The generalized Hamiltonian has an unbounded spectrum, which allows us to introduce a Hermitian time operator. In the proposed formulation of quantum mechanics, a system time and observer’s time are introduced. The Schrödinger equation in the system time either does not hold or holds only approximately. The wave function is assumed to be square integrable with respect to all coordinates, including the system time. In some limit, this formalism reproduces standard quantum mechanics and the corresponding measurement theory.
Abstract The problem of time in quantum mechanics (QM) concerns the fact that in the Schrödinger equation time is a parameter, not an operator. Pauli's objection to a time–energy uncertainty relation analogue to the position–momentum one, conjectured by Heisenberg early on, seemed to exclude the existence of such an operator. However Dirac's formulation of an electron's relativistic QM does allow the introduction of a dynamical time operator that is self-adjoint. Consequently, it can be considered as the generator of a unitary transformation of the system, as well as an additional system observable subject to uncertainty. In the present paper these aspects are examined within the standard framework of relativistic QM.
In its usual presentation, classical mechanics appears to give time a very special role. But it is well known that mechanics can be formulated so as to treat the time variable on the same footing as the other variables in the extended configuration space. Such covariant formulations are natural for relativistic gravitational systems, where general covariance conflicts with the notion of a preferred physical-time variable. The standard presentation of quantum mechanics, in turn, again gives time a very special role, raising well known difficulties for quantum gravity. Is there a covariant form of (canonical) quantum mechanics? We observe that the preferred role of time in quantum theory is the consequence of an idealization: that measurements are instantaneous. Canonical quantum theory can be given a covariant form by dropping this idealization. States prepared by noninstantaneous measurements are described by ``spacetime smeared states.'' The theory can be formulated in terms of these states, without making any reference to a special time variable. The quantum dynamics is expressed in terms of the propagator, an object covariantly defined on the extended configuration space.
The unsatisfactory status of the interpretation of the wave function of the Universe in canonical quantum gravity is reviewed. The ``naive interpretation'' obtained by straightforwardly applying the standard interpretive rules to the canonical quantization of general relativity is manifestly unacceptable; the ``WKB interpretation'' has only a limited domain of applicability; and the ``conditional probability interpretation'' requires one to pick out a ``preferred time variable'' (or preferred class of such variables) from among the dynamical variables. Evidence against the possibility of using a dynamical variable to play the role of ``time'' in the conditional probability interpretation is provided by the fact (proven here) that in ordinary Schr\"odinger quantum mechanics for a system with a Hamiltonian bounded from below, no dynamical variable can correlate monotonically with the Schr\"odinger time parameter t, and thus the role of t in the interpretation of Schr\"odinger quantum mechanics cannot be replaced by that of a dynamical variable. We also argue that the interpretive problems of quantum gravity are not alleviated by the incorporation of observers into the theory. Faced with these difficulties, we seek a formulation of canonical quantum gravity in which an appropriate nondynamical time parameter is present. By analogy with a parametrized form of ordinary Schr\"odinger quantum mechanics, we make a proposal for such a formulation. A specific proposal considered in detail yields a theory which corresponds at the classical level to general relativity with an arbitrary, unspecified cosmological constant. In minisuperspace models, this proposal yields a quantum theory with satisfactory interpretive properties, although it is unlikely that this theory will admit sufficiently many observables for general spacetimes. Nevertheless, we feel that the approach suggested here is worthy of further investigation.
A possible generalization of quantum mechanics is examined by showing that the motion in phase space of a classical Brownian particle may be described by a complex probability amplitude depending on the phase-space coordinates and the time, and obeying a Schrödinger-like equation. However formal this result may seem, the usual dynamical operators may be defined whose physical meaning stems directly from the theory. An outstanding feature of the formalism is that ordinary quantum mechanics in configuration space may be recovered in a limiting process whereby the velocity variable, defined now through a statistical distribution, is eliminated. Therefore, it plays the role of a hidden variable. This result supports recent reinterpretations of von Neumann's theorem on the nonexistence of such variables in quantum mechanics and serves as a counterexample of the usual interpretation of his theorem.