Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Nature Physics

Photonic quantum simulators

Alán Aspuru‐Guzik, Philip John Walther

Published Apr 1, 2012• 952 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1038/nphys2253

Related papers

Photonic Quantum Computing

Steven P. Hotaling, Andrew R. Pirich

•Jul 1, 1997•6 citations

All-photonic quantum simulators with spectrally disordered ensembles of emitters

Victoria A. Norman, Jesse Patton, Richard T. Scalettar +1 more

We model an all-photonic quantum simulator that consists of a solid-state coupled-cavity array with integrated ensembles of color centers. We quantify conditions for polariton creation that overcome the setbacks of moderate spectral dispersion.

Quantum 2.0 Conference and Exhibition•Jan 1, 2022•2 citations

Photonic Quantum Computing

Chuck Easttom

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

Experimental simulation of the exchange of Majorana zero modes with a photonic system

Jin‐Shi Xu, Kai Sun, Yong‐Jian Han +3 more

We experimentally simulate the exchange of Majorana zero modes with a photonic quantum simulator. Our work opens the way for the efficient realization and manipulation of Majorana zero modes in complex architectures.

Quantum Information and Measurement (QIM)•Jan 1, 2017•0 citations

Photonic Quantum Computing

Rohit Chaurasiya, Devanshi Arora

Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies•Jan 1, 2022•3 citations

Gaussian Models to Non-Gaussian Realms of Quantum Photonic Simulators

Dennis Delali Kwesi Wayo, Rodrigo Alves Dias, Masoud Darvish Ganji +2 more

Quantum photonic simulators have emerged as indispensable tools for modeling and optimizing quantum photonic circuits, bridging the gap between theoretical models and experimental implementations. This review explores the landscape of photonic quantum simulation, focusing on the transition from Gaussian to non-Gaussian models and the computational challenges associated with simulating large-scale photonic systems. Gaussian states and operations, which enable efficient simulations through covariance matrices and phase-space representations, serve as the foundation for photonic quantum computing. However, non-Gaussian states crucial for universal quantum computation introduce significant computational complexity, requiring advanced numerical techniques such as tensor networks and high-performance GPU acceleration. We evaluate the leading photonic quantum simulators, including Strawberry Fields, Piquasso, QuTiP SimulaQron, Perceval, and QuantumOPtics.jl analyzing their capabilities in handling continuous-variable (CV) and discrete-variable (DV) quantum systems. Special attention is given to hardware-accelerated methods, including GPU-based tensor network approaches, machine learning integration, and hybrid quantum-classical workflows. Furthermore, we investigate noise modeling techniques, such as photon loss and dark counts, and their impact on simulation accuracy. As photonic quantum computing moves toward practical implementations, advancements in high-performance computing (HPC) architectures, such as tensor processing units (TPUs) and system-on-a-chip (SoC) solutions, are accelerating the field. This review highlights emerging trends, challenges, and future directions for developing scalable and efficient photonic quantum simulators.

arXiv:2502.05245•Feb 7, 2025•0 citations
Quantum photonic simulators have emerged as indispensable tools for modeling and optimizing quantum photonic circuits, bridging the gap between theoretical models and experimental implementations. This review explores the landscape of photonic quantum simulation, focusing on the transition from Gaussian to non-Gaussian models and the computational challenges associated with simulating large-scale photonic systems. Gaussian states and operations, which enable efficient simulations through covariance matrices and phase-space representations, serve as the foundation for photonic quantum computing. However, non-Gaussian states crucial for universal quantum computation introduce significant computational complexity, requiring advanced numerical techniques such as tensor networks and high-performance GPU acceleration. We evaluate the leading photonic quantum simulators, including Strawberry Fields, Piquasso, QuTiP SimulaQron, Perceval, and QuantumOPtics.jl analyzing their capabilities in handling continuous-variable (CV) and discrete-variable (DV) quantum systems. Special attention is given to hardware-accelerated methods, including GPU-based tensor network approaches, machine learning integration, and hybrid quantum-classical workflows. Furthermore, we investigate noise modeling techniques, such as photon loss and dark counts, and their impact on simulation accuracy. As photonic quantum computing moves toward practical implementations, advancements in high-performance computing (HPC) architectures, such as tensor processing units (TPUs) and system-on-a-chip (SoC) solutions, are accelerating the field. This review highlights emerging trends, challenges, and future directions for developing scalable and efficient photonic quantum simulators.