Abstract The quantization of the dynamics of point systems is closely connected with the Hamilton-Jacobi theory of the calculus of variations for simple integrals, the latter being a suitable mathematical formalism for describing the classical laws of point dynamics. This connexion is evident from the fact that, in order to quantize a dynamical system, one has first to know what the pairs of canonically conjugate variables are, and also from the fact that the quantum laws, if expressed in terms of commutation brackets, have exactly the same form as the classical laws, if expressed in terms of Poisson brackets. In dealing with the quantization of the dynamics of continuous media, e.g. the electromagnetic and other fields, which has been developed along different lines, following Heisenberg and Pauli (1929), it seems tempting to try to base the method of quantization on an extended Hamilton-Jacobi theory of the calculus of variations for multiple integrals, the latter being the appropriate formalism for describing most relevant systems of continuum physics. In a previous paper (Weiss 1936), referred to as I, such an attem pt has been made, by extending the notion of pairs of conjugate variables. That attem pt led to quantum relations on an arbitrary space-like section in space-time, provided that one postulated that, if the space-like section becomes especially a space section, the quantum relations should go over into those of Heisenberg and Pauli.
Abstract The quantization of the dynamics of point systems is closely connected with the Hamilton-Jacobi theory of the calculus of variations for simple integrals, the latter being a suitable mathematical formalism for describing the classical laws of point dynamics. This connexion is evident from the fact that, in order to quantize a dynamical system, one has first to know what the pairs of canonically conjugate variables are, and also from the fact that the quantum laws, if expressed in terms of commutation brackets, have exactly the same form as the classical laws, if expressed in terms of Poisson brackets. In dealing with the quantization of the dynamics of continuous media, e.g. the electromagnetic and other fields, which has been developed along different lines, following Heisenberg and Pauli (1929), it seems tempting to try to base the method of quantization on an extended Hamilton-Jacobi theory of the calculus of variations for multiple integrals, the latter being the appropriate formalism for describing most relevant systems of continuum physics. In a previous paper (Weiss 1936), referred to as I, such an attem pt has been made, by extending the notion of pairs of conjugate variables. That attem pt led to quantum relations on an arbitrary space-like section in space-time, provided that one postulated that, if the space-like section becomes especially a space section, the quantum relations should go over into those of Heisenberg and Pauli.
Abstract The transition from classical mechanics to quantum mechanics has been formulated in various ways. But all these ways have the common feature that they use as starting point mechanics not in its Newtonian form, but in the form which it was given by Lagrange and Hamilton. The essence of this form consists in the fact that the differential equations are represented as Euler equations of a variational principle for v functions, the generalized coordinates, of one variable, the time. In its purely mathematical aspect the quantization method may, therefore, be regarded as a mode of taking certain notions and certain relations arising from a variational principle for several dependent and one independent variable and of giving them a new meaning.
Abstract The Hamilton-Jacobi theory is the apotheosis of Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics: action functions encode all of the possible trajectories of a mechanical system satisfying certain criteria. These action functions are the solutions of a nonlinear, first-order partial differential equation, called the Hamilton-Jacobi equation. The characteristic equations of this differential equation are the extended Hamilton equations. Solution of a class of mechanics problems is thus reduced to the solution of a single partial differential equation. Aside from its use as a problem-solving tool, the Hamilton-Jacobi theory has particular importance because of its close relation to the Schroedinger formulation of quantum mechanics. This chapter discusses the connection between the Hamilton-Jacobi theory and the Schroedinger formulation, the Bohm hidden variable model and Feynman path integral method that are derived from it, Hamilton’s characteristic equations, complete integrals, separation of variables, canonical transformations, general integrals, mono-energetic integrals, relativistic Hamilton-Jacobi equation, quantum Cauchy problem, quantum mechanics, and classical mechanics.
In the first part of this series we have shown how the Schrodinger equation for a single particle and the corresponding non relativistic quantum observables can be obtained from a purely classical phonon model through the Newtonian equations of motion. In this work we focus instead on how the classical Hamiltonian formalism applied to the same phonon system allows to recover the feature of relativistic quantum mechanics for a single spinless particle. Using the classical nature of the phonon model, we naturally define continuous Poisson brackets between classical observables, which allows to recover the dynamics of such observables, i.e. the Ehrenfest relations associated to real-valued Klein-Gordon fields. The Poisson brackets also permits to obtain the generic form of constants of motions, thus generalizing the concept of inner products and momentum on Klein-Gordon fields. We then connect the formalism of real-valued classical functionals with that of hermitian operators and complex-valued wave functions. This is done through the introduction of a non-local complex-valued change of variables which allows to rewrite the real-valued Klein-Gordon equation in a form akin to the Schrodinger equation, and the classical observables as quantum expectation values. Then, we show how this change of variables allows to rewrite the classical Poisson brackets as commutators of hermitian operators. This points out the strict equivalence between the Heisenberg formalism and the formalism of classical Poisson bracket. Eventually, we illustrate how the Poisson brackets allows to recover the transformations of Poincare group in 1+1 dimension together with its algebra. The latter makes the link between the Lorentz invariant inner product of Mostafazadeh and the Casimir invariant associated to the mass of particle.
Abstract The new mechanics of the atom introduced by Heisenberg may be based on the assumption that the variables that describe a dynamical system do not obey the commutative law of multiplication, but satisfy instead certain quantum conditions. One can build up a theory without knowing anything about the dynamical variables except the algebraic laws that they are subject to, and can show that they may be represented by matrices whenever a set of uniformising variables for the dynamical system exists. It may be shown, however (see 3), that there is no set of uniformising variables for a system containing more than one electron, so that the theory cannot progress very far on these lines. A new development of the theory has recently been given by Schrödinger. Starting from the idea that an atomic system cannot be represented by a trajectory, i. e., by a point moving through the co-ordinate space, but must be represented by a wave in this space, Schrödinger obtains from a variation principle a differential equation which the wave function ψ must satisty. This differential equation turns out to be very closely connected with the Hamiltonian equation which specifies the system, namely, if H (qr, Pr - W = 0 is the Hamiltonian equation of the system, where the qr, Pr are canonical variables, then the wave equation for ψ is {H(qr, ih ∂/∂q) - W} ψ = 0.
Classical mechanics admits multiple equivalent formulations, from Newton's equations to the variational Lagrange-Hamilton framework and the scalar Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) theory. In the HJ formulation, classical ensembles evolve through the continuity equation for a real density ρ=R2 coupled to Hamilton's principal function S. Here we develop a complementary formulation, the Hamilton-Jacobi-Schrödinger (HJS) theory, by embedding the pair (R,S) into a single complex field. Starting from a completely general complex ansatz ψ=f(R,S)eig(R,S), and imposing two minimal structural requirements, we obtain a unique map $ψ= R\, e^{iS/κ}\, $ together with a linear HJS equation whose ∣κ∣→0 limit reproduces the HJ formulation exactly. Remarkably, when Re(κ)=0, essential features of quantum mechanics, superposition, operator algebra, commutators, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, Born's rule and unitary evolution, follow naturally as structural consistency conditions. HJS thus provides a unified mathematical viewpoint in which classical and quantum dynamics appear as different limits of a single underlying structure.
Abstract The new quantum mechanics, introduced by Heisenberg and since developed from different points of view by various authors, takes its simplest form if one assumes merely that the dynamical variables are numbers of a special type (called q-numbers to distinguish them from ordinary or c-numbers) that obey all the ordinary algebraic laws except the commutative law of multiplication, and satisfy instead of this the relations qrqs – qsqr =0, prps – pspr = 0 } qrqs – psqr = 0 (r ≠ s) or ih(r = s) where the p's and q's are a set of canonical variables and h is a c-number euqal to (2π)-1 times the usual Planck’s constant. Equations (1) may be regarded as replacing the commutative law of the classical theory, as one can, with their help, build up a complete algebraic theory of quantities that are analytic functions of a set of canonical variables. Further, it may easily be seen that the quantity [x, y] defined by xy – yz = ih [x, y] is completely analogous to the Poisson bracket of the classical theory. By means of this analogy the whole of the classical dynamical theory, in so far as it can be expressed in terms of P. B.’s instead of differential coefficients, may be taken over immediately into the quantum theory.