Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Bell, Bohm, and Von Neumann: Some Philosophical Inequalities Concerning No-Go Theorems and the Axiomatic Method

Michael Stöltzner

Published Jan 1, 2002• 9 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-94-010-0385-8_3

Related papers

Von Neumann, Bell and Bohm

Jeremy Bernstein

This article discusses von Neumann's "proof" that hidden variable theories are impossible.

arXiv:1102.2222•Feb 10, 2011•2 citations

On von Neumann and Bell Theorems Applied to Quantumness Tests

Robert Alicki

arXiv:0810.4708•Foundations of Physics•Feb 18, 2009•6 citations

Analysis of explicit and implicit assumptions in the theorems of J. Von Neumann and J. Bell

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Journal of Russian Laser Research•May 1, 2007•14 citations

No-Go Theorem for Modeling with Von Neumann Observables

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2023•0 citations

Bohm, Spin, and the Bell Inequalities

Katherine Bedard

Synthese•Mar 1, 1998•6 citations

Violation of Bell's Inequality and Postulate on Simultaneous Measurement of Compatible Observables

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

We discuss coupling of violation of Bell's inequality and non-Kolmogorovness of statistical data in the EPR-Bohm experiment. We emphasize that nonlocalty and "death of realism" are only sufficient, but not necessary conditions of non-Kolmogorovness. There can be found other sufficient conditions of non-Kolmogorovness and, hence, violation of Bell's inequality. We find one important source of non-Kolmogorovness by analyzing axiomatics of quantum mechanics. We pay attention to the postulate (due to von Neumann and Dirac) on simultaneous measurement of quantum observables given by commuting operators. This postulate is criticized as nonphysical. We propose a new interpretation of the Born-von Neumann-Dirac rule for calculation of the joint probability distribution for such observables. It gets a natural physical interpretation by considering conditional measurement scheme. We use this argument (i.e., rejection of the postulate on simultaneous measurement to motivate non-Kolmogorovness of the probabilistic structure of the EPR-Bohm experiment.

arXiv:1102.4743•Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience•Mar 23, 2011•19 citations
We discuss coupling of violation of Bell's inequality and non-Kolmogorovness of statistical data in the EPR-Bohm experiment. We emphasize that nonlocalty and "death of realism" are only sufficient, but not necessary conditions of non-Kolmogorovness. There can be found other sufficient conditions of non-Kolmogorovness and, hence, violation of Bell's inequality. We find one important source of non-Kolmogorovness by analyzing axiomatics of quantum mechanics. We pay attention to the postulate (due to von Neumann and Dirac) on simultaneous measurement of quantum observables given by commuting operators. This postulate is criticized as nonphysical. We propose a new interpretation of the Born-von Neumann-Dirac rule for calculation of the joint probability distribution for such observables. It gets a natural physical interpretation by considering conditional measurement scheme. We use this argument (i.e., rejection of the postulate on simultaneous measurement to motivate non-Kolmogorovness of the probabilistic structure of the EPR-Bohm experiment.