Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Jurnal Teknologi

An Efficient Reconciliation in Removing Errors Using Bose, Chaudhuri, Hocquenghem Code for Quantum Key Distribution

Riaz Ahmad Qamar, Mohd Aizaini Maarof, Subariah Ibrahim

Published Nov 2, 2012• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

A quantum key distribution protocol(QKD), known as BB84, was developed in 1984 by Charles Bennett and Gilles Brassard. The protocol works in two phases which are quantum state transmission and conventional post processing. In the first phase of BB84, raw key elements are distributed between two legitimate users by sending encoded photons through quantum channel whilst in the second phase, a common secret-key is obtained from correlated raw key elements by exchanging messages through a public channel e.g.; network or internet. The secret-key so obtained is used for cryptography purpose. Reconciliation is a compulsory part of post processing and hence of quantum key distribution protocol. The performance of a reconciliation protocol depends on the generation rate of common secret-key, number of bits disclosed and the error probability in common secrete-key. These characteristics of a protocol can be achieved by using a less interactive reconciliation protocol which can handle a higher initial quantum bit error rate (QBER). In this paper, we use a simple Bose, Chaudhuri, Hocquenghem (BCH) error correction algorithm with simplified syndrome table to achieve an efficient reconciliation protocol which can handle a higher quantum bit error rate and outputs a common key with zero error probability. The proposed protocol efficient in removing errors such that it can remove all errors even if QBER is 60%. Assuming the post processing channel is an authenticated binary symmetric channel (BSC).

DOI
10.11113/jt.v59.1262

Related papers

Enhanced winnow key reconciliation for bennett-brassard 84 quantum key distribution protocol

Riaz Ahmad Qamar

Quantum cryptography specifically called Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) provides acceptable levels of secure communications by utilising established laws of quantum mechanics. QKD protocol distributes a raw key through quantum channel between two cryptography users and then it removes errors occurred during communication from the distributed key by passing messages via public channel. Most popular error reconciliation protocols such as Binary, Cascade and Winnow are used to remove errors in a secure way. Among these three protocols, Buttler’s Winnow has the advantage of less communication complexity, however it is less effective at high error rates in a key and has the disadvantage of introducing errors during error reconciliation, and hence, causes reduction in reconciled key size and/or leave errors in the reconciled key. Winnow can handle quantum bit error rates a maximum up to 18 percent. However, after 13 percent error rate, Winnow becomes highly interactive and it may fail to reconcile the key. The deficiencies of high interactivity, reduction in reconciled key size, leaving errors in the reconciled key and failure of Winnow can be removed by enhancing the error reconciliation protocol by employing modified Bose, Chaudhuri, Hocquenghem (BCH) channel coding techniques. The enhanced BCH encoding algorithm is designed to handle a key at higher quantum bit error rates. BCH error detection and correction algorithms are enhanced to minimise the error percentage in the reconciled key. The modified block interleaver is introduced in the reconciliation protocol to obtain a long-size reconciled key with minimum iterations. The enhanced error reconciliation protocol can reconcile the key up to 50 percent initial bit error rate and reduces public channel communications. Finally, a long sized identical shared secret key with minimal error rate approaching zero is obtained within two iterations. The attained key can be used with secret key cipher to encrypt and decrypt information.

•Aug 1, 2013•0 citations

Information Reconciliation for Quantum Key Distribution

David Elkouss, Jesús Martínez-Mateo, Vicente Martín

Quantum key distribution (QKD) relies on quantum and classical procedures in order to achieve the growing of a secret random string -the key- known only to the two parties executing the protocol. Limited intrinsic efficiency of the protocol, imperfect devices and eavesdropping produce errors and information leakage from which the set of measured signals -the raw key- must be stripped in order to distill a final, information theoretically secure, key. The key distillation process is a classical one in which basis reconciliation, error correction and privacy amplification protocols are applied to the raw key. This cleaning process is known as information reconciliation and must be done in a fast and efficient way to avoid cramping the performance of the QKD system. Brassard and Salvail proposed a very simple and elegant protocol to reconcile keys in the secret-key agreement context, known as Cascade, that has become the de-facto standard for all QKD practical implementations. However, it is highly interactive, requiring many communications between the legitimate parties and its efficiency is not optimal, imposing an early limit to the maximum tolerable error rate. In this paper we describe a low-density parity-check reconciliation protocol that improves significantly on these problems. The protocol exhibits better efficiency and limits the number of uses of the communications channel. It is also able to adapt to different error rates while remaining efficient, thus reaching longer distances or higher secure key rate for a given QKD system.

arXiv:1007.1616•Jul 9, 2010•5 citations

Information Reconciliation for Quantum Key Distribution

David Elkouss, Jesús Martínez-Mateo, Vicente Martín Ayuso +1 more

Quantum key distribution (QKD) relies on quantum and classical procedures in order to achieve the growing of a secret random string -the key- known only to the two parties executing the protocol. Limited intrinsic efficiency of the protocol, imperfect devices and eavesdropping produce errors and information leakage from which the set of measured signals -the raw key- must be stripped in order to distill a final, information theoretically secure, key. The key distillation process is a classical one in which basis reconciliation, error correction and privacy amplification protocols are applied to the raw key. This cleaning process is known as information reconciliation and must be done in a fast and efficient way to avoid cramping the performance of the QKD system. Brassard and Salvail proposed a very simple and elegant protocol to reconcile keys in the secret-key agreement context, known as Cascade, that has become the de-facto standard for all QKD practical implementations. However, it is highly interactive, requiring many communications between the legitimate parties and its efficiency is not optimal, imposing an early limit to the maximum tolerable error rate. In this paper we describe a low-density parity-check reconciliation protocol that improves significantly on these problems. The protocol exhibits better efficiency and limits the number of uses of the communications channel. It is also able to adapt to different error rates while remaining efficient, thus reaching longer distances or higher secure key rate for a given QKD system.

•Oct 1, 2010•31 citations

Secret key reconciliation using BCH code in quantum key distribution

Wuthigorn Traisilanun, Keattisak Sripimanwat, O. Sangaroon

Due to imperfection in quantum key distribution (QKD) an uncorrected secret key transmitted via quantum channel exists at the receiver side. This paper presents an alternative method to recover those quantum key by using BCH codes - a class of error control coding (ECC). Application of BCH codes to source coding with side information is described for quantum key reconciliation. Unlikely to many previous protocols, the proposed scheme aims to reduce public communication with acceptable quantum bit error rate and a number of disclosed bits; therefore, it is suitable to applications of high speed QKD.

International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies•Oct 1, 2007•16 citations

A reconciliation protocol with delayed error correction for quantum key distribution

Shengmei Zhao, Peng Jia Shi, Hong XIAO

A delayed error-correction (EC) reconciliation protocol for quantum key distribution (QKD) is proposed in the paper, where the error correction operation is operated after the messages have been transmitted. There are two advantages of the proposed protocol. First, it is possible for the two nodes without a direct quantum link to share secret keys, when the two nodes are separately connected to a common trusted relay in the QKD network. Besides, the reconciliation protocol with the delayed EC also simplifies the whole reconciliation process. It corrects both errors caused by communications during QKD process and that inherent in message bits. The key generation rate of the delayed EC protocol is presented. Finally, the bit error rate of the proposed protocol is analyzed when using polar codes as the error correction codes. The results show that the performance of the delayed EC reconciliation protocol with polar codes were better than those using low-density parity check code.

Scientia Sinica Technologica•Aug 1, 2015•0 citations

EFFICIENT RECONCILIATION WITH RATE ADAPTIVE CODES IN QUANTUM KEY DISTRIBUTION

David Elkouss, Jesús Martínez-Mateo, Vicente Martín +1 more

Quantum key distribution (QKD) relies on quantum and classical procedures in order to achieve the growing of a secret random string —the key— known only to the two parties executing the protocol. Limited intrinsic efficiency of the protocol, imperfect devices and eavesdropping produce errors and information leakage from which the set of measured signals —the raw key— must be stripped in order to distill a final, information theoretically secure, key. The key distillation process is a classical one in which basis reconciliation, error correction and privacy amplification protocols are applied to the raw key. This cleaning process is known as information reconciliation and must be done in a fast and efficient way to avoid cramping the performance of theQKD system. Brassard and Salvail proposed a very simple and elegant protocol to reconcile keys in the secretkey agreement context, known as Cascade, that has become the de-facto standard for all QKD practical implementations. However, it is highly interactive, requiring many communications between the legitimate parties and its efficiency is not optimal, imposing an early limit to the maximum tolerable error rate. In this paper we describe a low-density parity-check reconciliation protocol that improves significantly on these problems. The protocol exhibits better efficiency and limits the number of uses of the communications channel. It is also able to adapt to different error rates while remaining efficient, thus reaching longer distances or higher secure key rate for a given QKD system.

•Jan 1, 2010•1 citation
A quantum key distribution protocol(QKD), known as BB84, was developed in 1984 by Charles Bennett and Gilles Brassard. The protocol works in two phases which are quantum state transmission and conventional post processing. In the first phase of BB84, raw key elements are distributed between two legitimate users by sending encoded photons through quantum channel whilst in the second phase, a common secret-key is obtained from correlated raw key elements by exchanging messages through a public channel e.g.; network or internet. The secret-key so obtained is used for cryptography purpose. Reconciliation is a compulsory part of post processing and hence of quantum key distribution protocol. The performance of a reconciliation protocol depends on the generation rate of common secret-key, number of bits disclosed and the error probability in common secrete-key. These characteristics of a protocol can be achieved by using a less interactive reconciliation protocol which can handle a higher initial quantum bit error rate (QBER). In this paper, we use a simple Bose, Chaudhuri, Hocquenghem (BCH) error correction algorithm with simplified syndrome table to achieve an efficient reconciliation protocol which can handle a higher quantum bit error rate and outputs a common key with zero error probability. The proposed protocol efficient in removing errors such that it can remove all errors even if QBER is 60%. Assuming the post processing channel is an authenticated binary symmetric channel (BSC).
Quantum cryptography specifically called Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) provides acceptable levels of secure communications by utilising established laws of quantum mechanics. QKD protocol distributes a raw key through quantum channel between two cryptography users and then it removes errors occurred during communication from the distributed key by passing messages via public channel. Most popular error reconciliation protocols such as Binary, Cascade and Winnow are used to remove errors in a secure way. Among these three protocols, Buttler’s Winnow has the advantage of less communication complexity, however it is less effective at high error rates in a key and has the disadvantage of introducing errors during error reconciliation, and hence, causes reduction in reconciled key size and/or leave errors in the reconciled key. Winnow can handle quantum bit error rates a maximum up to 18 percent. However, after 13 percent error rate, Winnow becomes highly interactive and it may fail to reconcile the key. The deficiencies of high interactivity, reduction in reconciled key size, leaving errors in the reconciled key and failure of Winnow can be removed by enhancing the error reconciliation protocol by employing modified Bose, Chaudhuri, Hocquenghem (BCH) channel coding techniques. The enhanced BCH encoding algorithm is designed to handle a key at higher quantum bit error rates. BCH error detection and correction algorithms are enhanced to minimise the error percentage in the reconciled key. The modified block interleaver is introduced in the reconciliation protocol to obtain a long-size reconciled key with minimum iterations. The enhanced error reconciliation protocol can reconcile the key up to 50 percent initial bit error rate and reduces public channel communications. Finally, a long sized identical shared secret key with minimal error rate approaching zero is obtained within two iterations. The attained key can be used with secret key cipher to encrypt and decrypt information.
Quantum key distribution (QKD) relies on quantum and classical procedures in order to achieve the growing of a secret random string -the key- known only to the two parties executing the protocol. Limited intrinsic efficiency of the protocol, imperfect devices and eavesdropping produce errors and information leakage from which the set of measured signals -the raw key- must be stripped in order to distill a final, information theoretically secure, key. The key distillation process is a classical one in which basis reconciliation, error correction and privacy amplification protocols are applied to the raw key. This cleaning process is known as information reconciliation and must be done in a fast and efficient way to avoid cramping the performance of the QKD system. Brassard and Salvail proposed a very simple and elegant protocol to reconcile keys in the secret-key agreement context, known as Cascade, that has become the de-facto standard for all QKD practical implementations. However, it is highly interactive, requiring many communications between the legitimate parties and its efficiency is not optimal, imposing an early limit to the maximum tolerable error rate. In this paper we describe a low-density parity-check reconciliation protocol that improves significantly on these problems. The protocol exhibits better efficiency and limits the number of uses of the communications channel. It is also able to adapt to different error rates while remaining efficient, thus reaching longer distances or higher secure key rate for a given QKD system.
Quantum key distribution (QKD) relies on quantum and classical procedures in order to achieve the growing of a secret random string -the key- known only to the two parties executing the protocol. Limited intrinsic efficiency of the protocol, imperfect devices and eavesdropping produce errors and information leakage from which the set of measured signals -the raw key- must be stripped in order to distill a final, information theoretically secure, key. The key distillation process is a classical one in which basis reconciliation, error correction and privacy amplification protocols are applied to the raw key. This cleaning process is known as information reconciliation and must be done in a fast and efficient way to avoid cramping the performance of the QKD system. Brassard and Salvail proposed a very simple and elegant protocol to reconcile keys in the secret-key agreement context, known as Cascade, that has become the de-facto standard for all QKD practical implementations. However, it is highly interactive, requiring many communications between the legitimate parties and its efficiency is not optimal, imposing an early limit to the maximum tolerable error rate. In this paper we describe a low-density parity-check reconciliation protocol that improves significantly on these problems. The protocol exhibits better efficiency and limits the number of uses of the communications channel. It is also able to adapt to different error rates while remaining efficient, thus reaching longer distances or higher secure key rate for a given QKD system.
Due to imperfection in quantum key distribution (QKD) an uncorrected secret key transmitted via quantum channel exists at the receiver side. This paper presents an alternative method to recover those quantum key by using BCH codes - a class of error control coding (ECC). Application of BCH codes to source coding with side information is described for quantum key reconciliation. Unlikely to many previous protocols, the proposed scheme aims to reduce public communication with acceptable quantum bit error rate and a number of disclosed bits; therefore, it is suitable to applications of high speed QKD.
A delayed error-correction (EC) reconciliation protocol for quantum key distribution (QKD) is proposed in the paper, where the error correction operation is operated after the messages have been transmitted. There are two advantages of the proposed protocol. First, it is possible for the two nodes without a direct quantum link to share secret keys, when the two nodes are separately connected to a common trusted relay in the QKD network. Besides, the reconciliation protocol with the delayed EC also simplifies the whole reconciliation process. It corrects both errors caused by communications during QKD process and that inherent in message bits. The key generation rate of the delayed EC protocol is presented. Finally, the bit error rate of the proposed protocol is analyzed when using polar codes as the error correction codes. The results show that the performance of the delayed EC reconciliation protocol with polar codes were better than those using low-density parity check code.
Quantum key distribution (QKD) relies on quantum and classical procedures in order to achieve the growing of a secret random string —the key— known only to the two parties executing the protocol. Limited intrinsic efficiency of the protocol, imperfect devices and eavesdropping produce errors and information leakage from which the set of measured signals —the raw key— must be stripped in order to distill a final, information theoretically secure, key. The key distillation process is a classical one in which basis reconciliation, error correction and privacy amplification protocols are applied to the raw key. This cleaning process is known as information reconciliation and must be done in a fast and efficient way to avoid cramping the performance of theQKD system. Brassard and Salvail proposed a very simple and elegant protocol to reconcile keys in the secretkey agreement context, known as Cascade, that has become the de-facto standard for all QKD practical implementations. However, it is highly interactive, requiring many communications between the legitimate parties and its efficiency is not optimal, imposing an early limit to the maximum tolerable error rate. In this paper we describe a low-density parity-check reconciliation protocol that improves significantly on these problems. The protocol exhibits better efficiency and limits the number of uses of the communications channel. It is also able to adapt to different error rates while remaining efficient, thus reaching longer distances or higher secure key rate for a given QKD system.