Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society

A repetition of the Bothe-Geiger experiment

William Ernest Burcham, Wilfrid Bennett Lewis

Published Dec 1, 1936• 4 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A repetition has been made, with the introduction of electrical counting methods, of the experiment of Bothe and Geiger on the simultaneous production of a scattered quantum and of a recoil electron in the scattering of X-rays. Evidence has been obtained that such coincidences do actually occur, in agreement with the results of the original experiment, and with the Compton theory of scattering.

DOI
10.1017/s0305004100019368

Related papers

Simultaneity in the Compton Effect

R. Hofstadter, John A. Mcintyre

The Bothe-Geiger experiment has been repeated under improved conditions of time resolution, obtained by using stillbene scintillation counters. The recoil electron and scattered photon are emitted together within a time interval of less than 1.5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\ensuremath{-}8}$ second. The electron and photon are also projected without a delay larger than 1.5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\ensuremath{-}8}$ second after arrival of a quantum. The familiar concepts used in discussions of the Compton effect are shown to be valid.

Physical Review•Apr 1, 1950•20 citations

An Apparent Failure of the Photon Theory of Scattering

Robert S. Shankland

A test has been made of the photon theory of the scattering of high frequency radiation. The pairs of scattered photons and recoil electrons predicted by this theory have been looked for by means of specially designed Geiger-M\"uller counters. Coincident discharges in the electron and photon counters were recorded by means of a vacuum tube amplifying and adding circuit. The scatterers used were air, aluminum, beryllium, filter paper and paraffin. The radiation was the gamma-rays from radium C. Experiments were performed with the counters set at various angles, some where the photon theory predicts coincidences, and others where coincidences should not be expected. The experiments uniformly gave fewer coincidences in the correct positions than were expected, and those observed could in every case be accounted for as chance coincidences due to the finite resolving time of the apparatus. It has not been found possible to bring the results of these experiments into accord with the photon theory of scattering. The wave-mechanical theory of the scattering process has not yet been extended to include the gamma-ray region so that it is impossible to compare this theory with the present experiments. Unless it is shown that the two theories disagree in the gamma-ray region it does not seem possible to reconcile the present experiment with the Bothe-Geiger and Compton-Simon experiments.

Physical Review•Jan 1, 1936•38 citations

The Conservation of Energy and Momentum in Compton Scattering

William G. Cross, Norman F. Ramsey

An experiment similar to that of Bothe and Maier-Leibnitz and others has been carried out to verify that in Compton scattering of 2.62-Mev quanta the scattered quantum and recoil electron are emitted without delay and in the relative directions demanded by the conservation laws. Better angular resolution and statistics and fewer experimental uncertainties than in the previous experiments were obtained. The results are in agreement with simultaneity and the conservation of energy and momentum.

Physical Review•Dec 15, 1950•28 citations

XXXIV. An experimental study of the quantum nature of X-rays

M. Parker Givens

A study has been made of the X-rays symmetrically diffracted by the (130) and (10) planes of NaCl. The object of the study was to determine whether or not X-rays are diffracted in both directions simultaneously. Two Geiger Muller counters were used to detect the X-rays. A coincidence circuit was connected to the two counters. Over 20 million quanta were counted by each counter, yet only 12 thousand apparent coincidences were observed. A detailed study of the data reveals that this small number of coincidences is best interpreted by assuming no coherence between the two diffracted X-ray beams and attributing the coincidence counts to the chance arrival of two quanta, one at each counter, separated in time by less than the resolving time of the coincidence circuit. This lack of coincidence is in accord with the quantum picture of radiation.

The London Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science•May 1, 1946•8 citations

Five problems for classical physics

J Manners

Chapter I The origins of quantum physics I The Compton effect — a strange dichotomy in the nature of electromagnetic radiation In a series of experiments conducted between 1919 and 1923, Arthur Holly Compton (Figure 1.1) investigated the scattering of monochromatic (single-wavelength) X-rays from graphite targets. He found that the radiation scattered at an angle 0 to the incident beam contained, in addition to radiation of the same wavelength as the incident radiation, a second component with a considerably longer wavelength. The existence of this second component in the scattered radiation could not be explained by the well-established theory of the scattering of electromagnetic waves by electrons. Compton considered instead the process illustrated in Figure 1.2, in which a particle of electromagnetic radiation, collides with a slow moving electron, which then recoils absorbing some of the X-ray particle’s energy. Treating the process as a collision between particles, and using only the (relativistic) conservation laws of energy and momentum, Compton was able to account for the effect completely. However, at the same time, in the same experiment, Compton was using interference effects, depending wholly on the wave model, in order to determine the wavelength of the scattered radiation. So here was an experiment which apparently required the simultaneous use of both the wave and particle models of electromagnetic radiation for the interpretation of the results! The existence of this strange dichotomy in the nature of electromagnetic radiation was just one indication of the need for a radical revision of views regarding the physical world.

CRC Press eBooks•Oct 8, 2018•0 citations

Arthur Compton and the mysteries of light

Erik A. Henriksen

For nearly 20 years, Einstein’s quantum theory of light was disputed on the basis that light was a wave. In 1922 Compton’s x-ray scattering experiment proved light’s dual nature.

Physics Today•Dec 1, 2022•5 citations
A repetition has been made, with the introduction of electrical counting methods, of the experiment of Bothe and Geiger on the simultaneous production of a scattered quantum and of a recoil electron in the scattering of X-rays. Evidence has been obtained that such coincidences do actually occur, in agreement with the results of the original experiment, and with the Compton theory of scattering.
The Bothe-Geiger experiment has been repeated under improved conditions of time resolution, obtained by using stillbene scintillation counters. The recoil electron and scattered photon are emitted together within a time interval of less than 1.5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\ensuremath{-}8}$ second. The electron and photon are also projected without a delay larger than 1.5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\ensuremath{-}8}$ second after arrival of a quantum. The familiar concepts used in discussions of the Compton effect are shown to be valid.
A test has been made of the photon theory of the scattering of high frequency radiation. The pairs of scattered photons and recoil electrons predicted by this theory have been looked for by means of specially designed Geiger-M\"uller counters. Coincident discharges in the electron and photon counters were recorded by means of a vacuum tube amplifying and adding circuit. The scatterers used were air, aluminum, beryllium, filter paper and paraffin. The radiation was the gamma-rays from radium C. Experiments were performed with the counters set at various angles, some where the photon theory predicts coincidences, and others where coincidences should not be expected. The experiments uniformly gave fewer coincidences in the correct positions than were expected, and those observed could in every case be accounted for as chance coincidences due to the finite resolving time of the apparatus. It has not been found possible to bring the results of these experiments into accord with the photon theory of scattering. The wave-mechanical theory of the scattering process has not yet been extended to include the gamma-ray region so that it is impossible to compare this theory with the present experiments. Unless it is shown that the two theories disagree in the gamma-ray region it does not seem possible to reconcile the present experiment with the Bothe-Geiger and Compton-Simon experiments.
A study has been made of the X-rays symmetrically diffracted by the (130) and (10) planes of NaCl. The object of the study was to determine whether or not X-rays are diffracted in both directions simultaneously. Two Geiger Muller counters were used to detect the X-rays. A coincidence circuit was connected to the two counters. Over 20 million quanta were counted by each counter, yet only 12 thousand apparent coincidences were observed. A detailed study of the data reveals that this small number of coincidences is best interpreted by assuming no coherence between the two diffracted X-ray beams and attributing the coincidence counts to the chance arrival of two quanta, one at each counter, separated in time by less than the resolving time of the coincidence circuit. This lack of coincidence is in accord with the quantum picture of radiation.
Chapter I The origins of quantum physics I The Compton effect — a strange dichotomy in the nature of electromagnetic radiation In a series of experiments conducted between 1919 and 1923, Arthur Holly Compton (Figure 1.1) investigated the scattering of monochromatic (single-wavelength) X-rays from graphite targets. He found that the radiation scattered at an angle 0 to the incident beam contained, in addition to radiation of the same wavelength as the incident radiation, a second component with a considerably longer wavelength. The existence of this second component in the scattered radiation could not be explained by the well-established theory of the scattering of electromagnetic waves by electrons. Compton considered instead the process illustrated in Figure 1.2, in which a particle of electromagnetic radiation, collides with a slow moving electron, which then recoils absorbing some of the X-ray particle’s energy. Treating the process as a collision between particles, and using only the (relativistic) conservation laws of energy and momentum, Compton was able to account for the effect completely. However, at the same time, in the same experiment, Compton was using interference effects, depending wholly on the wave model, in order to determine the wavelength of the scattered radiation. So here was an experiment which apparently required the simultaneous use of both the wave and particle models of electromagnetic radiation for the interpretation of the results! The existence of this strange dichotomy in the nature of electromagnetic radiation was just one indication of the need for a radical revision of views regarding the physical world.