Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

On the Lorentz invariance of the Square root Klein-Gordon Equation: the correction of the Born rule

Mohammad Javad Kazemi, Jafar Khodagholizadeh, Mohammad Hosein Barati

Published Oct 19, 2014• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the Lorentz invariance of the square root Klein-Gordon equation. This equation with interpreting $|\psi|^{2}$ as position probability density is not Lorentz invariance but we can make this equation Lorentz invariant with the help of new proper interpretation of the wave function. In this regard we consider the relation between the probability density and the wave function as$\rho=\psi \psi^{\ast}+ (\hat{D}\psi)^{\ast}\hat{D}\psi$ and show appropriate selection of the linear operator$\hat{D}$the square root Klein-Gordon equation will be Lorentz invariant. In fact the solutions of this equation is equivalent to the positive energy solutions of the Dirac equation. \end{abstract}

Related papers

On the Lorentz invariance of the Square root Klein-Gordon Equation

Kazemi, Mohammad Javad, Mohammad Hosein Barati, Jafar Khodagholizadeh +1 more

We show that the Born's rule is incompatible with Lorentz symmetry of the Square Root Klein-Gordon equation (SRKG equation). It has been demonstrated that the Born rule must be modified in relativistic regime if one wishes to keep the SRKG equation as the correct equation for describing quantum behavior.

arXiv:1410.5041•Oct 19, 2014•0 citations

The Klein-Gordon equation with relativistic mass: a relativistic Schrödinger equation

P.-A. Gourdain

The Klein-Gordon equation describes the wave-like behavior of spinless particles since it is Lorentz invariant. While it seemed initially ripe for explaining the electronic structure of the hydrogen atom, the lack of a unconditional positive probability density really limited its applications. Yet, it is intimately connected with fermions. Any solution to the Dirac equation is automatically a solution to the Klein-Gordon equation. What is even more surprising, the Klein-Gordon equation for a free particle turns into the Schrödinger equation in the non-relativistic limit. In this work we show that these problems disappear when we use the relativistic mass instead of the rest mass. While the Klein-Gordon equation losses its Lorentz invariance because of this transformation, it gains most of the features present the Schrödinger equation, including the unconditional positivity of probability density, while keeping most of its relativistic characteristics intact, including the matter-wave dispersion relation. What is even more surprising, the non-relativistic, quasi-static limit of the Klein-Gordon equation with relativistic mass is simply the Schrödinger equation under all possible conditions. So, it can be argued that this Klein-Gordon equation is a sort of relativistic Schrödinger equation.

arXiv:2501.07798•Jan 14, 2025•0 citations

Relativistic generalization of the Born rule

Kazemi, Mohammad Javad, Mohammad Hosein Barati, Rokni, Yahya +1 more

We have shown that the Born rule $(ρ=|ψ|^{2})$ is inconsistent with Lorentz symmetry of the Salpeter equation (square root Klein-Gordon equation). So we find relativistic modification of the Born rule as $ρ=\frac{1}{2mc^{2}}(|\sqrt{\widehat{H}-mc^{2}}ψ|^{2}+|\sqrt{\widehat{H}+mc^{2}}ψ|^{2})$ , which is consistent with Lorentz symmetry of this equation

arXiv:1504.07582•Apr 28, 2015•0 citations

A Lorentz Invariant Schrödinger Equation for Spin 0

E. Trübenbacher

Abstract Using the concept of distributions, the square root of the operator - Δ + m2 is taken in a mathematically well defined way for one component wave functions. A new representation of proper Lorentz transformations for one component wave functions makes it possible to construct a relativistic quantum mechanics for spin 0, comprising a Lorentz invariant wave equation, a scalar product, and a positive definite density satisfying, together with a current, a continuity equation, and coupling of scalar and vector potentials. Some interesting consequences of the theory concerning the concept of particle trajectory and velocity of propagation of the probability amplitude are discussed in detail. As an example of practical application a perturbation theory for discrete states is set up.

Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A•Sep 1, 1989•0 citations

The basis of quantum mechanics' compatibility with relativity--whose impairment gives rise to the Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations

Steven Kenneth Kauffmann

Solitary-particle quantum mechanics' inherent compatibility with special relativity is implicit in Schroedinger's postulated wave-function rule for the operator quantization of the particle's canonical three-momentum, taken together with his famed time-dependent wave-function equation that analogously treats the operator quantization of its Hamiltonian. The resulting formally four-vector equation system assures proper relativistic covariance for any solitary-particle Hamiltonian operator which, together with its canonical three-momentum operator, is a Lorentz-covariant four-vector operator. This, of course, is always the case for the quantization of the Hamiltonian of a properly relativistic classical theory, so the strong correspondence principle definitely remains valid in the relativistic domain. Klein-Gordon theory impairs this four-vector equation by iterating and contracting it, thereby injecting extraneous negative-energy solutions that are not orthogonal to their positive-energy counterparts of the same momentum, thus destroying the basis of the quantum probability interpretation. Klein-Gordon theory, which thus depends on the square of the Hamiltonian operator, is as well thereby cut adrift from Heisenberg's equations of motion. Dirac theory confuses the space-time symmetry of the four-vector equation system with such symmetry for its time component alone, which it fatuously imposes, thereby breaching the strong correspondence principle for the free particle and imposing the starkly unphysical momentum-independence of velocity. Physically sensible alternatives, with external electromagnetic fields, to the Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations are derived, and the simple, elegant symmetry-based approach to antiparticles is pointed out.

arXiv:1005.2641•May 15, 2010•1 citation

From Primitives to the Klein–Gordon Equation

Allen Proxmire

The Klein–Gordon equation, written down in 1926 by Oskar Klein and Walter Gordon (and earlier in unpublished form by Schrödinger himself), is the natural relativistic extension of quantum mechanics for spin‑zero particles: (□ + m²c²/ℏ²) Ψ = 0 where □ = (1/c²) ∂ₜ² − ∇². The equation is second‑order in both time and space, treats them symmetrically, and reduces to the free‑particle Schrödinger equation in the non‑relativistic limit. Its plane‑wave solutions satisfy the relativistic mass‑shell condition E² = p²c² + m²c⁴. Why is a relativistic version needed at all? The Schrödinger equation describes how quantum systems evolve when they’re moving slowly compared to the speed of light — fine for atoms, molecules, and everyday chemistry, where electrons move at less than 1% of c. But the Schrödinger equation is first‑order in time and second‑order in space, treating the two on different footings. Special relativity says space and time are unified into a single four‑dimensional structure where Lorentz transformations mix them, and any equation that privileges time over space breaks Lorentz invariance. A truly fundamental quantum equation must respect this symmetry. Klein–Gordon is the minimal scalar‑field equation that does. The standard derivation runs by analogy: start with the relativistic energy–momentum relation E² = p²c² + m²c⁴, replace E by iℏ∂ₜ and p by −iℏ∇, apply both sides to a wavefunction. This produces the right equation but it’s not really a derivation — it’s a guess motivated by the Schrödinger operator‑substitution procedure. This walkthrough shows how the Event Density framework derives the Klein–Gordon equation from substrate primitives — the same primitives that gave the Born rule, the Schrödinger equation, and the Bell–Tsirelson bound — plus the commitment to Lorentz covariance. The participation measure becomes Lorentz‑covariant. The unique second‑order Lorentz‑scalar differential operator on a scalar field is the d’Alembertian; the minimum‑order Lorentz‑scalar linear equation is therefore (□ + M²) Ψ = 0. Dimensional analysis fixes M² = m²c²/ℏ². Local U(1) gauge invariance forces the covariant derivative and the conserved four‑current. The non‑relativistic limit, via rest‑energy factorization, recovers the free‑particle Schrödinger equation exactly. The structural payoff: the Klein–Gordon equation is what you get when the substrate ontology is pushed through a Lorentz‑covariant reformulation. No new primitives are required. Relativistic and non‑relativistic quantum mechanics are not two theories glued together by analogy; they are the same substrate ontology applied at different velocity regimes. The walkthrough is honest about the known caveats — negative‑energy solutions and the non‑positive‑definite j₀ current — both of which resolve at the Dirac level and at QFT.

•May 12, 2026•0 citations
In this paper, we investigate the Lorentz invariance of the square root Klein-Gordon equation. This equation with interpreting ∣ψ∣2|\psi|^{2}∣ψ∣2 as position probability density is not Lorentz invariance but we can make this equation Lorentz invariant with the help of new proper interpretation of the wave function. In this regard we consider the relation between the probability density and the wave function asρ=ψψ∗+(D^ψ)∗D^ψ\rho=\psi \psi^{\ast}+ (\hat{D}\psi)^{\ast}\hat{D}\psiρ=ψψ∗+(D^ψ)∗D^ψ and show appropriate selection of the linear operatorD^\hat{D}D^the square root Klein-Gordon equation will be Lorentz invariant. In fact the solutions of this equation is equivalent to the positive energy solutions of the Dirac equation. \end{abstract}
The Klein-Gordon equation describes the wave-like behavior of spinless particles since it is Lorentz invariant. While it seemed initially ripe for explaining the electronic structure of the hydrogen atom, the lack of a unconditional positive probability density really limited its applications. Yet, it is intimately connected with fermions. Any solution to the Dirac equation is automatically a solution to the Klein-Gordon equation. What is even more surprising, the Klein-Gordon equation for a free particle turns into the Schrödinger equation in the non-relativistic limit. In this work we show that these problems disappear when we use the relativistic mass instead of the rest mass. While the Klein-Gordon equation losses its Lorentz invariance because of this transformation, it gains most of the features present the Schrödinger equation, including the unconditional positivity of probability density, while keeping most of its relativistic characteristics intact, including the matter-wave dispersion relation. What is even more surprising, the non-relativistic, quasi-static limit of the Klein-Gordon equation with relativistic mass is simply the Schrödinger equation under all possible conditions. So, it can be argued that this Klein-Gordon equation is a sort of relativistic Schrödinger equation.
We have shown that the Born rule (ρ=∣ψ∣2)(ρ=|ψ|^{2})(ρ=∣ψ∣2) is inconsistent with Lorentz symmetry of the Salpeter equation (square root Klein-Gordon equation). So we find relativistic modification of the Born rule as ρ=12mc2(∣H^−mc2ψ∣2+∣H^+mc2ψ∣2)ρ=\frac{1}{2mc^{2}}(|\sqrt{\widehat{H}-mc^{2}}ψ|^{2}+|\sqrt{\widehat{H}+mc^{2}}ψ|^{2})ρ=2mc21​(∣H−mc2​ψ∣2+∣H+mc2​ψ∣2) , which is consistent with Lorentz symmetry of this equation
Abstract Using the concept of distributions, the square root of the operator - Δ + m2 is taken in a mathematically well defined way for one component wave functions. A new representation of proper Lorentz transformations for one component wave functions makes it possible to construct a relativistic quantum mechanics for spin 0, comprising a Lorentz invariant wave equation, a scalar product, and a positive definite density satisfying, together with a current, a continuity equation, and coupling of scalar and vector potentials. Some interesting consequences of the theory concerning the concept of particle trajectory and velocity of propagation of the probability amplitude are discussed in detail. As an example of practical application a perturbation theory for discrete states is set up.
Solitary-particle quantum mechanics' inherent compatibility with special relativity is implicit in Schroedinger's postulated wave-function rule for the operator quantization of the particle's canonical three-momentum, taken together with his famed time-dependent wave-function equation that analogously treats the operator quantization of its Hamiltonian. The resulting formally four-vector equation system assures proper relativistic covariance for any solitary-particle Hamiltonian operator which, together with its canonical three-momentum operator, is a Lorentz-covariant four-vector operator. This, of course, is always the case for the quantization of the Hamiltonian of a properly relativistic classical theory, so the strong correspondence principle definitely remains valid in the relativistic domain. Klein-Gordon theory impairs this four-vector equation by iterating and contracting it, thereby injecting extraneous negative-energy solutions that are not orthogonal to their positive-energy counterparts of the same momentum, thus destroying the basis of the quantum probability interpretation. Klein-Gordon theory, which thus depends on the square of the Hamiltonian operator, is as well thereby cut adrift from Heisenberg's equations of motion. Dirac theory confuses the space-time symmetry of the four-vector equation system with such symmetry for its time component alone, which it fatuously imposes, thereby breaching the strong correspondence principle for the free particle and imposing the starkly unphysical momentum-independence of velocity. Physically sensible alternatives, with external electromagnetic fields, to the Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations are derived, and the simple, elegant symmetry-based approach to antiparticles is pointed out.
The Klein–Gordon equation, written down in 1926 by Oskar Klein and Walter Gordon (and earlier in unpublished form by Schrödinger himself), is the natural relativistic extension of quantum mechanics for spin‑zero particles: (□ + m²c²/ℏ²) Ψ = 0 where □ = (1/c²) ∂ₜ² − ∇². The equation is second‑order in both time and space, treats them symmetrically, and reduces to the free‑particle Schrödinger equation in the non‑relativistic limit. Its plane‑wave solutions satisfy the relativistic mass‑shell condition E² = p²c² + m²c⁴. Why is a relativistic version needed at all? The Schrödinger equation describes how quantum systems evolve when they’re moving slowly compared to the speed of light — fine for atoms, molecules, and everyday chemistry, where electrons move at less than 1% of c. But the Schrödinger equation is first‑order in time and second‑order in space, treating the two on different footings. Special relativity says space and time are unified into a single four‑dimensional structure where Lorentz transformations mix them, and any equation that privileges time over space breaks Lorentz invariance. A truly fundamental quantum equation must respect this symmetry. Klein–Gordon is the minimal scalar‑field equation that does. The standard derivation runs by analogy: start with the relativistic energy–momentum relation E² = p²c² + m²c⁴, replace E by iℏ∂ₜ and p by −iℏ∇, apply both sides to a wavefunction. This produces the right equation but it’s not really a derivation — it’s a guess motivated by the Schrödinger operator‑substitution procedure. This walkthrough shows how the Event Density framework derives the Klein–Gordon equation from substrate primitives — the same primitives that gave the Born rule, the Schrödinger equation, and the Bell–Tsirelson bound — plus the commitment to Lorentz covariance. The participation measure becomes Lorentz‑covariant. The unique second‑order Lorentz‑scalar differential operator on a scalar field is the d’Alembertian; the minimum‑order Lorentz‑scalar linear equation is therefore (□ + M²) Ψ = 0. Dimensional analysis fixes M² = m²c²/ℏ². Local U(1) gauge invariance forces the covariant derivative and the conserved four‑current. The non‑relativistic limit, via rest‑energy factorization, recovers the free‑particle Schrödinger equation exactly. The structural payoff: the Klein–Gordon equation is what you get when the substrate ontology is pushed through a Lorentz‑covariant reformulation. No new primitives are required. Relativistic and non‑relativistic quantum mechanics are not two theories glued together by analogy; they are the same substrate ontology applied at different velocity regimes. The walkthrough is honest about the known caveats — negative‑energy solutions and the non‑positive‑definite j₀ current — both of which resolve at the Dirac level and at QFT.