Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Three Gedanken Experiments on Complementarity in Double‐Slit Diffraction

Anton Zeilinger

Published Dec 1, 1986• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb12420.x

Related papers

The gedanken double-slit experiment with extended incoherent sources

Pedro Sancho

Physics Letters A•Apr 1, 2001•1 citation

Einstein–Bohr recoiling double-slit gedanken experiment performed at the molecular level

X.-J. Liu, Quan Miao, Faris Gel’mukhanov +6 more

Double-slit experiments illustrate proof for wave–particle complementarity. The essence of Einstein–Bohr's debate about wave–particle duality was whether the momentum transfer between a particle and a recoiling slit could mark the path, thus destroying the interference. We realized this recoiling double-slit gedanken experiment by resonant X-ray photoemission from molecular oxygen for geometries near equilibrium (coupled slits) and in a dissociative state far away from equilibrium (decoupled slits). Interference is observed in the former case, while the electron momentum transfer quenches the interference in the latter case.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Sep 7, 2015•1 citation

Reciprocal two-slit diffraction experiment

Yoshiki Ohoka, S. Fukatsu

The Japan Society of Applied Physics•Feb 8, 2018•0 citations

Outflanking quantum complementarity:detection of incompatible properties in double-slit experiments

Angela Sestito, Giuseppe Nisticò, Annamaria Canino

•Mar 11, 2014•0 citations

Diffraction of matter waves in space and in time

Časlav Brukner, Anton Zeilinger

In analogy to the well-known diffraction of waves at spatial structures, one can also define diffraction in time when a wave is temporarily modulated. In the present paper we investigate this phenomenon starting from a Green's-function approach. Diffraction in time appears for Schr\"odinger waves and not for light in vacuum. Specific cases of diffraction in time investigated here are diffraction at an ``edge in time'' and a Fresnel lens in time. We then investigate in detail the simultaneous diffraction both in space and in time representing a general solution. Then we analyze in detail diffraction at an edge, both in space and in time, of a single slit in space and in time, a double slit in space, and a single slit in time, a single slit in space and a double slit in time, and, finally, a double slit both in space and in time. In all cases we analyze the possibilities of various approximations which can be made, and show the limits and validity of the Fraunhofer approximation both in space and in time. We give explicit results for a gedanken experiment with very cold atoms.

Physical Review A•Nov 1, 1997•67 citations

Should We Interpret Quantum Mechanics According to Bohr

Shubhayan Sarkar

I present here a thought experiment which violates the most widely accepted interpretation of quantum mechanics “The Copenhagen Interpretation” and Bohr’s complementarity which says that there is no meaning of the state of a particle until it is observed and the act of observation might change it. The experiment consists of a double slit apparatus which is modified by putting a second double slit apparatus between the source and the original apparatus with certain conditions imposed on both the apparatuses using the facts of interference and diffraction. A striking paradox emerges if we consider the arguments of Bohr’s complementarity, i.e. the photon travels through both the paths simultaneously in a double slit apparatus whenever there is interference. It turns out that this paradox can be resolved only if the photon travels through one path even if interference fringes are visible.

•Mar 1, 2017•0 citations
Double-slit experiments illustrate proof for wave–particle complementarity. The essence of Einstein–Bohr's debate about wave–particle duality was whether the momentum transfer between a particle and a recoiling slit could mark the path, thus destroying the interference. We realized this recoiling double-slit gedanken experiment by resonant X-ray photoemission from molecular oxygen for geometries near equilibrium (coupled slits) and in a dissociative state far away from equilibrium (decoupled slits). Interference is observed in the former case, while the electron momentum transfer quenches the interference in the latter case.
In analogy to the well-known diffraction of waves at spatial structures, one can also define diffraction in time when a wave is temporarily modulated. In the present paper we investigate this phenomenon starting from a Green's-function approach. Diffraction in time appears for Schr\"odinger waves and not for light in vacuum. Specific cases of diffraction in time investigated here are diffraction at an ``edge in time'' and a Fresnel lens in time. We then investigate in detail the simultaneous diffraction both in space and in time representing a general solution. Then we analyze in detail diffraction at an edge, both in space and in time, of a single slit in space and in time, a double slit in space, and a single slit in time, a single slit in space and a double slit in time, and, finally, a double slit both in space and in time. In all cases we analyze the possibilities of various approximations which can be made, and show the limits and validity of the Fraunhofer approximation both in space and in time. We give explicit results for a gedanken experiment with very cold atoms.
I present here a thought experiment which violates the most widely accepted interpretation of quantum mechanics “The Copenhagen Interpretation” and Bohr’s complementarity which says that there is no meaning of the state of a particle until it is observed and the act of observation might change it. The experiment consists of a double slit apparatus which is modified by putting a second double slit apparatus between the source and the original apparatus with certain conditions imposed on both the apparatuses using the facts of interference and diffraction. A striking paradox emerges if we consider the arguments of Bohr’s complementarity, i.e. the photon travels through both the paths simultaneously in a double slit apparatus whenever there is interference. It turns out that this paradox can be resolved only if the photon travels through one path even if interference fringes are visible.