Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Communications in Theoretical Physics

Geometric Phase of a Coupled System

H. S. Abdel-Aziz

Published Nov 15, 2004• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

In this contribution, my main attention is paid to the study of the geometric phase of a two-level system. Asymptotic expansion of the eigenvalue and analytic information are obtained. The results are illustrated with an application to a specific atomic system.
DOI
10.1088/0253-6102/42/5/672

Related papers

BERRY PHASE IN COUPLED TWO-LEVEL SYSTEMS

X. Y. Zhang, J. H. TENG, X. X. Yi

The application of geometric phases into robust control of quantal systems has triggered exploration of the geometric phase for coupled subsystems. Earlier studies have mainly focused on the situation where the external control parameters are in the free Hamiltonian of the subsystems, i.e. the controls exert only on the individual subsystems. Here we consider another circumstance that we can control the coupling geiϕ between the subsystems. By changing only the phase ϕ in the coupling constant, we derive the Berry phase acquired by the system and compare it to the geometric phase acquired by changing the coupling strength g. We find that the asymptotic behavior of the Berry phase depends on the relative Rabi frequency of the two subsystems, and it approaches π when the amplitude of the coupling tends to infinity.

Modern Physics Letters B•Apr 18, 2013•5 citations

Geometric phase in open systems: Beyond the Markov approximation and weak-coupling limit

X. X. Yi, D. M. Tong, L. C. Wang +2 more

Beyond the quantum Markov approximation and the weak-coupling limit, we present a general theory to calculate the geometric phase for open systems with and without conserved energy. As an example, the geometric phase for a two-level system coupling both dephasingly and dissipatively to its environment is calculated. Comparison with the results from quantum trajectory analysis is presented and discussed.

arXiv:quant-ph/0602181•Physical Review A•May 12, 2006•40 citations

Geometric Phases In Quantum Systems Of Pure And Mixed State

Miran Haider

Note that equations and expressions has been omitted here and is instead presented in the work. This thesis focuses on the geometric phase in pure and mixed quantum states. For the case of a pure q ...

•Jan 1, 2017•0 citations

Ergotropy from Geometric Phases in a Dephasing Qubit

Fernando C. Lombardo, Paula I. Villar

We analyze the geometric phase and dynamic phase acquired by a qubit coupled to an environment through pure dephasing, establishing a direct connection between phase accumulation and ergotropy. We show that the dynamic phase depends solely on the incoherent ergotropy, reflecting its purely energetic origin. In contrast, the geometric phase exhibits a nontrivial dependence on both the coherent and incoherent contributions to the total ergotropy, encoding the interplay between coherence, dissipation, and energy extraction. By performing a perturbative expansion in the qubit-environment coupling strength, we demonstrate that, in the weak-coupling and long-time regime, the geometric phase becomes determined exclusively by the incoherent ergotropy, which coincides with the asymptotic value of the total ergotropy reached under decoherence. These results provide a clear physical distinction between dynamic and geometric phases in open quantum systems and establish geometric phases as sensitive probes of energetic resources. Furthermore,~in superconducting circuit implementations, our findings suggest that the ergotropy of a two-level system could be inferred indirectly from geometric-phase measurements using standard techniques such as quantum state tomography.

quant-pharXiv:2603.01129•Mar 3, 2026•0 citations

Ergotropy from Geometric Phases in a Dephasing Qubit

Fernando C. Lombardo, Paula I. Villar

We analyze the geometric phase and dynamic phase acquired by a qubit coupled to an environment through pure dephasing, establishing a direct connection between phase accumulation and ergotropy. We show that the dynamic phase depends solely on the incoherent ergotropy, reflecting its purely energetic origin. In contrast, the geometric phase exhibits a nontrivial dependence on both the coherent and incoherent contributions to the total ergotropy, encoding the interplay between coherence, dissipation, and energy extraction. By performing a perturbative expansion in the qubit–environment coupling strength, we demonstrate that, in the weak-coupling and long-time regime, the geometric phase becomes determined exclusively by the incoherent ergotropy, which coincides with the asymptotic value of the total ergotropy reached under decoherence. These results provide a clear physical distinction between dynamic and geometric phases in open quantum systems and establish geometric phases as sensitive probes of energetic resources. Furthermore, in superconducting circuit implementations, our findings suggest that the ergotropy of a two-level system could be inferred indirectly from geometric-phase measurements using standard techniques such as quantum state tomography.

Quantum Reports•Feb 12, 2026•0 citations

The Geometric Phase in Quantum Systems: Foundations, Mathematical Concepts, and Applications in Molecular and Condensed Matter Physics

Arno Böhm, Alí Mostafazadeh, Hiroyasu Koizumi +2 more

•Jun 12, 2003•306 citations
The application of geometric phases into robust control of quantal systems has triggered exploration of the geometric phase for coupled subsystems. Earlier studies have mainly focused on the situation where the external control parameters are in the free Hamiltonian of the subsystems, i.e. the controls exert only on the individual subsystems. Here we consider another circumstance that we can control the coupling geiϕ between the subsystems. By changing only the phase ϕ in the coupling constant, we derive the Berry phase acquired by the system and compare it to the geometric phase acquired by changing the coupling strength g. We find that the asymptotic behavior of the Berry phase depends on the relative Rabi frequency of the two subsystems, and it approaches π when the amplitude of the coupling tends to infinity.
We analyze the geometric phase and dynamic phase acquired by a qubit coupled to an environment through pure dephasing, establishing a direct connection between phase accumulation and ergotropy. We show that the dynamic phase depends solely on the incoherent ergotropy, reflecting its purely energetic origin. In contrast, the geometric phase exhibits a nontrivial dependence on both the coherent and incoherent contributions to the total ergotropy, encoding the interplay between coherence, dissipation, and energy extraction. By performing a perturbative expansion in the qubit-environment coupling strength, we demonstrate that, in the weak-coupling and long-time regime, the geometric phase becomes determined exclusively by the incoherent ergotropy, which coincides with the asymptotic value of the total ergotropy reached under decoherence. These results provide a clear physical distinction between dynamic and geometric phases in open quantum systems and establish geometric phases as sensitive probes of energetic resources. Furthermore,~in superconducting circuit implementations, our findings suggest that the ergotropy of a two-level system could be inferred indirectly from geometric-phase measurements using standard techniques such as quantum state tomography.
We analyze the geometric phase and dynamic phase acquired by a qubit coupled to an environment through pure dephasing, establishing a direct connection between phase accumulation and ergotropy. We show that the dynamic phase depends solely on the incoherent ergotropy, reflecting its purely energetic origin. In contrast, the geometric phase exhibits a nontrivial dependence on both the coherent and incoherent contributions to the total ergotropy, encoding the interplay between coherence, dissipation, and energy extraction. By performing a perturbative expansion in the qubit–environment coupling strength, we demonstrate that, in the weak-coupling and long-time regime, the geometric phase becomes determined exclusively by the incoherent ergotropy, which coincides with the asymptotic value of the total ergotropy reached under decoherence. These results provide a clear physical distinction between dynamic and geometric phases in open quantum systems and establish geometric phases as sensitive probes of energetic resources. Furthermore, in superconducting circuit implementations, our findings suggest that the ergotropy of a two-level system could be inferred indirectly from geometric-phase measurements using standard techniques such as quantum state tomography.