Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

Superposition of coherent and incoherent fields

J. Perˇina

Published Mar 1, 1967• 65 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0375-9601(67)90612-3

Related papers

Atoms in coherent and incoherent fields

Saad S. M. Hassan, R. Bullough

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Aug 1, 1988•19 citations

Super-resolving interference without intensity-correlation measurement

De-Zhong Cao, Baolong Xu, Su-Heng Zhang +1 more

The high-order intensity correlation function of $N$-photon interference with thermal light observed in a recent experiment [S. Oppel, T. B\"uttner, P. Kok, and J. von Zanthier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 233603 (2012)] is analyzed. The terms in the expansion of the $N\mathrm{th}$-order correlation function are put into three groups. One group contributes a homogeneous background. Both of the other two contribute $(N\ensuremath{-}1)$-fold super-resolving fringes. In principle they correspond to coherent and incoherent superpositions of classical optical fields, respectively. Therefore similar super-resolving fringes can be obtained without intensity-correlation measurements. We report the experimental results of the coherent and incoherent super-resolving diffraction fringes, which are observed directly in the intensity distribution. The $N\ensuremath{-}1$ sources in both the coherent and incoherent cases are set in certain definite positions. In the coherent case, moreover, the phase difference between two adjacent source fields is $\ensuremath{\pi}$. The fringe visibility is unity in the incoherent case, while it decreases as $N$ increases in the incoherent case.

Physical Review A•May 28, 2015•3 citations

Incoherence, Quantum Fluctuations, and Noise

I. R. Senitzky

An examination is made of the relationship between the uncertainty principle and minimum amplifier noise. First, the concept of coherence is discussed, and an incoherence parameter is defined in terms of the uncertainty that enters into the uncertainty principle. Harmonic oscillator states are examined for coherence. The concept of noise is then discussed and contrasted with incoherence, noise referring to behavior in time of a single system while incoherence involving comparison among members of an ensemble. It is shown, with illustrations, that the two concepts are different, and that an incoherent field of a cavity mode need not exhibit noise. In particular, the zero-point field in a lossless cavity is not noise. The superposition of many incoherent effects, however, usually leads to noise. Spontaneous emission is examined both for coherence and noise. It is shown that the spontaneous emission field of a single molecule is incoherent but does not exhibit noise; the (low order) spontaneous emission from a molecular beam, however, does constitute noise. Spontaneous emission from complex systems is also discussed. The origin of fundamental noise in an amplifier is investigated and is shown to come from spontaneous emission by the amplification mechanism. It is concluded that fundamental noise cannot be determined by a consideration of quantum fluctuations of---or by the application of the uncertainty principle to---the electromagnetic field only, as has been done in several recent articles. The physical significance of the zero-point field is analyzed, and is shown to lie in a formal contribution to spontaneous emission by the mechanism coupled to the field, provided this mechanism is treated quantum mechanically.

Physical Review•Dec 15, 1962•21 citations

Atoms in coherent and incoherent fields

Saad S. M. Hassan, R. Bullough

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Aug 1, 1988•9 citations

Transformations of superpositions by means of incoherent operations

Marcelo Losada, G. M. Bosyk, Héctor Freytes +1 more

In this paper we study how the coherence of a superposition of pure states is related with the coherence of its components. We consider two pure initial states and two pure final coherent states, such that the former ones cannot be transformed into the latter ones by means of incoherent transformations. In this situation, we analyze conditions for the existence of superpositions of the initial states that can be transformed into superpositions of the final states. In particular, we consider superpositions formed by quantum states belonging to orthogonal subspaces. By appealing to the majorization theory, we obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for such transformations to be possible. Finally, we provide some examples that illustrate the difference between the obtained conditions and the necessary criterion based on the relative entropy of coherence.

Scientific Reports•May 19, 2020•2 citations

Coherent Superposition and Decomposition

Edward Collett

SPIE eBooks•Sep 4, 2009•0 citations
The high-order intensity correlation function of NNN-photon interference with thermal light observed in a recent experiment [S. Oppel, T. B\"uttner, P. Kok, and J. von Zanthier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 233603 (2012)] is analyzed. The terms in the expansion of the NthN\mathrm{th}Nth-order correlation function are put into three groups. One group contributes a homogeneous background. Both of the other two contribute $(N\ensuremath{-}1)$-fold super-resolving fringes. In principle they correspond to coherent and incoherent superpositions of classical optical fields, respectively. Therefore similar super-resolving fringes can be obtained without intensity-correlation measurements. We report the experimental results of the coherent and incoherent super-resolving diffraction fringes, which are observed directly in the intensity distribution. The $N\ensuremath{-}1$ sources in both the coherent and incoherent cases are set in certain definite positions. In the coherent case, moreover, the phase difference between two adjacent source fields is $\ensuremath{\pi}$. The fringe visibility is unity in the incoherent case, while it decreases as NNN increases in the incoherent case.
An examination is made of the relationship between the uncertainty principle and minimum amplifier noise. First, the concept of coherence is discussed, and an incoherence parameter is defined in terms of the uncertainty that enters into the uncertainty principle. Harmonic oscillator states are examined for coherence. The concept of noise is then discussed and contrasted with incoherence, noise referring to behavior in time of a single system while incoherence involving comparison among members of an ensemble. It is shown, with illustrations, that the two concepts are different, and that an incoherent field of a cavity mode need not exhibit noise. In particular, the zero-point field in a lossless cavity is not noise. The superposition of many incoherent effects, however, usually leads to noise. Spontaneous emission is examined both for coherence and noise. It is shown that the spontaneous emission field of a single molecule is incoherent but does not exhibit noise; the (low order) spontaneous emission from a molecular beam, however, does constitute noise. Spontaneous emission from complex systems is also discussed. The origin of fundamental noise in an amplifier is investigated and is shown to come from spontaneous emission by the amplification mechanism. It is concluded that fundamental noise cannot be determined by a consideration of quantum fluctuations of---or by the application of the uncertainty principle to---the electromagnetic field only, as has been done in several recent articles. The physical significance of the zero-point field is analyzed, and is shown to lie in a formal contribution to spontaneous emission by the mechanism coupled to the field, provided this mechanism is treated quantum mechanically.
In this paper we study how the coherence of a superposition of pure states is related with the coherence of its components. We consider two pure initial states and two pure final coherent states, such that the former ones cannot be transformed into the latter ones by means of incoherent transformations. In this situation, we analyze conditions for the existence of superpositions of the initial states that can be transformed into superpositions of the final states. In particular, we consider superpositions formed by quantum states belonging to orthogonal subspaces. By appealing to the majorization theory, we obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for such transformations to be possible. Finally, we provide some examples that illustrate the difference between the obtained conditions and the necessary criterion based on the relative entropy of coherence.