Quantum Electronics

Reply to V I Emelyanov's letter [Quantum Electronics 28 (2) 182-184 (February 1998)]

F. Kh. Mirzoev

Published Sep 30, 1998• 0 citations

Abstract

Replies are given to the critical comments addressed to the undersigned and published in Quantum Electronics . Reply to V I Emelyanov 1998 Quantum Electron. 28 182 .

DOI: 10.1070/qe1998v028n09abeh001339

Related papers

Franz and Tešanović Reply:

Marcel Franz, Zlatko Tešanović

Physical Review LettersDec 31, 20032 citations

Comment on “Quantum Szilard Engine”

Martin Plesch, Oscar Dahlsten, John Goold +1 more

A Comment on the Letter by S. W. Kim et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 070401 (2011). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

arXiv:1309.4209Physical Review LettersOct 30, 201316 citations

Comment on “Quantum Backreaction on `Classical' Variables”

K. R. W. Jones

A Comment on the Letter by Arlen Anderson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 621 (1995). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 27 February 1995DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4087©1996 American Physical Society

Physical Review LettersMay 20, 199619 citations

Comment on “Quantum telegraph: is it possible?” by B.B. Kadomtsev (Phys. Lett. A 210 (1996) 371)

You Lin Wu

Physics Letters AMay 1, 19991 citation

Comment on “Unraveling Quantum Dissipation in the Frequency Domain”

D. B. Horoshko, S. Ya. Kilin

A Comment on the Letter by M. Holland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5117 (1998). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 8 February 1999DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.2469©1999 American Physical Society

Physical Review LettersSep 20, 19995 citations

Comment on ‘‘Quantum mysteries revisited,’’ by N. David Mermin [Am. J. Phys. 5 8, 731–734 (1990)]

Achin Sen

American Journal of PhysicsAug 1, 19919 citations