We use a Bayesian approach to optimally solve problems in noisy binary search. We deal with two variants: 1. Each comparison can be erroneous with some probability
1−p. 2. At each stage
k comparisons can be performed in parallel and a noisy answer is returned We present a (classic) algorithm which optimally solves both variants together, up to an additive term of O(\log \log(n)), and prove matching information theoretic lower bounds. We use the algorithm to improve the results of Farhi et al \cite{FGGS99} presenting a quantum (error free) search algorithm in an ordered list of expected complexity less than (\log_2n) / 3.
Ordered search is the problem of locating a target element in a sorted list of size
n using comparison queries. Classically, binary search requires
⌈log2n⌉ queries, which is optimal. Quantum algorithms offer a constant-factor speedup, but the precise constant has been a longstanding open question. We close this gap by exhibiting two new quantum algorithms for ordered search, each using the optimal
π1lnn+o(logn) queries. The first, discovered by Claude Fable 5, is a simple zero-error algorithm derived from a continuum relaxation of the problem. The second, discovered by GPT-5.6-Sol (informed by Claude's zero-error algorithm), is an exact algorithm based on an analytic solution of the polynomial program of Farhi, Goldstone, Gutmann, and Sipser.
In this paper we describe how to use convex optimization to design quantum algorithms for certain computational tasks. In particular, we consider the ordered search problem, where it is desired to find a specific item in an ordered list of N items. While the best classical algorithm for this problem uses log2N queries to the list, a quantum computer can solve this problem much faster. By characterizing a class of quantum query algorithms for ordered search in terms of a semidefinite program, we find quantum algorithms using 4log605N ≈ 0.433 log2N queries, which improves upon the previously best known exact algorithm.
We prove lower bounds on the error probability of a quantum algorithm for searching through an unordered list of N items, as a function of the number T of queries it makes. In particular, if T=O(sqrt{N}) then the error is lower bounded by a constant. If we want error <1/2^N then we need T=Omega(N) queries. We apply this to show that a quantum computer cannot do much better than a classical computer when amplifying the success probability of an RP-machine. A classical computer can achieve error <=1/2^k using k applications of the RP-machine, a quantum computer still needs at least ck applications for this (when treating the machine as a black-box), where c>0 is a constant independent of k. Furthermore, we prove a lower bound of Omega(sqrt{log N}/loglog N) queries for quantum bounded-error search of an ordered list of N items.
We prove that any exact quantum algorithm searching an ordered list of N elements requires more than \frac{1}π(\ln(N)-1) queries to the list. This improves upon the previously best known lower bound of {1/12}\log_2(N) - O(1). Our proof is based on a weighted all-pairs inner product argument, and it generalizes to bounded-error quantum algorithms. The currently best known upper bound for exact searching is roughly 0.526 \log_2(N). We give an exact quantum algorithm that uses \log_3(N) + O(1) queries, which is roughly 0.631 \log_2(N). The main principles in our algorithm are an quantum parallel use of the classical binary search algorithm and a method that allows basis states in superpositions to communicate.
We study hybrid quantum-classical algorithms in the query model. The computation consists of quantum subroutines that make at most
q oracle queries; between subroutines, all qubits are measured and discarded. We prove matching upper and lower bounds for several problems in this model:
(i) (Unbiased) Phase estimation up to a precision
ε requires
Θ(qε21) queries;
(ii) (Unbiased) Amplitude estimation up to a precision
ε requires
Θ(qε2p(1−p)) queries;
(iii) Search among
N items requires
Θ(qN) queries;
(iv) Two level AND-OR tree (AND of
m ORs, with
n inputs to each OR) requires
Θ(qnm) queries.
All of these bounds are optimal up to a constant factor, for all
q from 1, corresponding to the classical complexity, to
Q(f), the unrestricted quantum query complexity of the respective problem. We also derive a hybrid lower bound for distinguishing two distributions specified by a state-preparation unitary; this bound is tight up to a logarithmic factor.
Besides specific lower bounds, an important contribution is developing methods for proving lower bounds on hybrid quantum algorithms (which have been very ad-hoc up to now). The first two bounds follow from a common framework: we analyze probability distributions over measurement transcripts and bound a progress measure that captures their distinguishability. The AND-OR bound requires a more delicate argument, combining two progress measures that track the information available to the algorithm classically and in quantum form, respectively.