Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Einstein‐Podolsky‐Rosen Constraints on Quantum Action‐at‐a‐Distance

Anastasios Kyprianidis

Published Dec 1, 1986• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb12468.x

Related papers

Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen constraints on quantum action at a distance: The Sutherland paradox

Nicola Cufaro Petroni, Christopher Dewdney, Peter Holland +2 more

Foundations of Physics•Aug 1, 1987•7 citations

Quantum Action-at-a-Distance: The Mystery of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Correlations

Anastasios Kyprianidis, Jean Pierre Vigier

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1988•1 citation

Constraints for the violation of the Bell inequality in Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiments

Emilio Santos

Physics Letters A•Apr 1, 1995•25 citations

The quantum potential and signalling in the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment

Peter Holland, Jean Pierre Vigier

Foundations of Physics•Jul 1, 1988•7 citations

Quantum mechanics versus local realism : the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox

F. Selleri

1 History of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox.- 2 Are Faster-Than-Light Influences Necessary?.- 3 All the Inequalities of Einstein Locality.- 4 Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Experiments Using the Decays of ?c or J/? into ??? ? ?-?p?+p?.- Chapter5 Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox for the K0-K?0 and B0-B?0 Systems.- 6 Even Local Probabilities Lead to the Paradox.- 7 The Experimental Investigation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Question and Bell's Inequality.- 8 Rapisarda's Experiment: Testing Quantum Mechanics versus Local Hidden-Variable Theories with Dichotomic Analyzers.- 9 Nonlocality and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Experiment as Understood through the Quantum-Potential Approach.- 10 Interpretation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Effect in Terms of a Generalized Causality.- 11 Quantum Action-at-a-Distance: The Mystery of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Correlations.- 12 Particle Trajectories and Quantum Correlations.- 13 Bell's Inequality and the Nonergodic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.- 14 An Extended-Probability Response to the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument.- 15 The Search for Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics.- 16 Variable Detection Probability Models for Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Type Experiments.- 17 Stochastic Electrodynamics and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument.- 18 Explicit Calculations with a Hidden-Variable Spin Model.- 19 Symmetric and Asymmetric Models for Atomic Cascade Experiments.

Plenum Press eBooks•Jan 1, 1988•64 citations

A realistic view of the canonical Einstein$ndash$Podolsky$ndash$Rosen$ndash$Bohm experiment based on quantum theory and its consequences

Boon Leong Lan

A realistic view of the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen–Bohm experiment with spins based on quantum theory is presented. This view implies that there is no action at a distance. It also implies that the measurement result A ( B ) for particle 1 (2) depends on both magnet angles, and hence the probability of obtaining the result A ( B ) also depends on both magnet angles. In the light of these realistic implications, it is clear that what is wrong at least with local realistic theory is not the locality or no-action-at-a-distance assumption itself but rather the formal implementation of that assumption.

arXiv:quant-ph/0202151•Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics•Aug 1, 2002•5 citations
1 History of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox.- 2 Are Faster-Than-Light Influences Necessary?.- 3 All the Inequalities of Einstein Locality.- 4 Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Experiments Using the Decays of ?c or J/? into ??? ? ?-?p?+p?.- Chapter5 Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox for the K0-K?0 and B0-B?0 Systems.- 6 Even Local Probabilities Lead to the Paradox.- 7 The Experimental Investigation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Question and Bell's Inequality.- 8 Rapisarda's Experiment: Testing Quantum Mechanics versus Local Hidden-Variable Theories with Dichotomic Analyzers.- 9 Nonlocality and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Experiment as Understood through the Quantum-Potential Approach.- 10 Interpretation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Effect in Terms of a Generalized Causality.- 11 Quantum Action-at-a-Distance: The Mystery of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Correlations.- 12 Particle Trajectories and Quantum Correlations.- 13 Bell's Inequality and the Nonergodic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.- 14 An Extended-Probability Response to the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument.- 15 The Search for Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics.- 16 Variable Detection Probability Models for Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Type Experiments.- 17 Stochastic Electrodynamics and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument.- 18 Explicit Calculations with a Hidden-Variable Spin Model.- 19 Symmetric and Asymmetric Models for Atomic Cascade Experiments.
A realistic view of the canonical EinsteinndashndashndashPodolskyndashndashndashRosenndashndashndashBohm experiment based on quantum theory and its consequences
A realistic view of the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen–Bohm experiment with spins based on quantum theory is presented. This view implies that there is no action at a distance. It also implies that the measurement result A ( B ) for particle 1 (2) depends on both magnet angles, and hence the probability of obtaining the result A ( B ) also depends on both magnet angles. In the light of these realistic implications, it is clear that what is wrong at least with local realistic theory is not the locality or no-action-at-a-distance assumption itself but rather the formal implementation of that assumption.