Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields

Path integrals and stationary-phase approximations

John R. Klauder

Published Apr 15, 1979• 327 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The general formalism for path integrals expressed in terms of an arbitrary continuous representation (generalized coherent states) is applied to give $c$-number formulations for the canonical algebra and for the spin algebra, and is used to derive meaningful stationary-phase approximations for these two cases. Some clarification of a recent discussion by Jevicki and Papanicolaou for the spin case is given.

DOI
10.1103/physrevd.19.2349

Related papers

A natural extension of coherent state path integrals

Masao Matsumoto

We develop the formulation of the path integrals via the coherent states based on general starting vectors. In this paper we treat the case of the ordinary canonical (Heisenberg-Weyl) coherent state. We find that an additional term appears in the action in the path integral expression. Geometric phases associated with the path integrals, including the possibilities of the experimental detection, are also discussed.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Aug 1, 1996•7 citations

Stationary Phase in Coherent State Path Integrals

Ray, Chris, Giulio Ruffini

In applying the stationary phase approximation to coherent state path integrals a difficulty occurs; there are no classical paths that satisfy the boundary conditions of the path integral. Others have gotten around this problem by reevaluating the action. In this work it is shown that it is not necessary to reevaluate the action because the stationary phase approximation is applicable so long as the path, about which the expansion is performed, satisfies the associated Lagrange's equations of motion. It is not necessary for this path to satisfy the boundary conditions in order to apply the stationary phase approximation.

arXiv:math-ph/0101026•Jan 23, 2001•0 citations

On the stationary phase evaluation of path integrals in the coherent states representation

Yitzhak Weissman

The extremal paths that arise in the stationary phase evaluation of coherent state path integrals do not seem to have a simple physical interpretation, in contrast to the extremal paths that occur in the conventional path integrals. On the other hand, a recently derived semiclassical formula for the coherent state propagator involves a path that is determined in exactly the same manner as the extremal paths of the conventional path integrals. Since both the semiclassical and the stationary phase analyses yield asymptotic (h(cross) to 0) approximations, the stationary phase and the semiclassical expressions for the propagator should be identical. The author presents a simple and direct proof that, in spite of the apparent differences, this is indeed the case. The simplification in the semiclassical formula is due to the utilisation of an appropriate set of canonical variables to describe the classical dynamics. In order to illustrate the usefulness of the semiclassical formula they present an application to the problem of the degenerate parametric amplifier, which had been treated before by operator ordering and path integral methods. The semiclassical approach has a simple classical interpretation that is absent in the alternative treatments.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Aug 21, 1983•37 citations

Semiclassical Propagator in the Generalized Coherent-State Representation

Thiago F. Viscondi, Adriano Grigolo, Marcus A. M. de Aguiar

A detailed derivation of the semiclassical propagator in the generalized coherent-state representation is performed by applying the saddle-point method to a path integral over the classical phase space. With the purpose of providing greater accessibility and applicability to the developed formalism, a brief review of the generalized concept of coherent states is presented, in which three examples of coherent-state sets are examined, namely, the canonical, spin, and SU(n) bosonic coherent states.

arXiv:1510.05952•Oct 20, 2015•2 citations

Selecta from a Life-Long Obsession with Path Integrals

John R. Klauder, Christopher Casenas Bernido, M. Victoria Carpio-Bernido

The definition and interpretation of canonical, phase space path integrals has evolved over many years to achieve a form that now admits a correct and rigorous formulation, which is also covariant under canonical coordinate transformations. Such formulations involve coherent state representations, which, in their modern version, were originally introduced as an alternative tool to construct phase space path integrals. Moreover, coherent state representations lead to physical interpretations that are more natural than those afforded by more traditional representations. Suitable continuous time regularization procedures lead to a covariant phase space path integral formulation that greatly clarifies the vague phrase that canonical quantization requires Cartesian coordinates.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations

Coherent-state path integral for a transition amplitude: A theory and applications

E. A. Kochetov, Vladimir Sergeevich Yarunin

The analytical methods of path integral (PI) calculations are presented for transition matrix elements in a basis of the generalized coherent states (CS'). Appropriate transformations in phase space are found and the stationary-phase method is developed with a particular emphasis on the PI boundary terms. Examples demonstrate the application of the general scheme for spin systems and the tests of the accuracy of the semiclassical approximation in nonlinear dynamics.

Physica Scripta•Jan 1, 1995•13 citations
The general formalism for path integrals expressed in terms of an arbitrary continuous representation (generalized coherent states) is applied to give ccc-number formulations for the canonical algebra and for the spin algebra, and is used to derive meaningful stationary-phase approximations for these two cases. Some clarification of a recent discussion by Jevicki and Papanicolaou for the spin case is given.
In applying the stationary phase approximation to coherent state path integrals a difficulty occurs; there are no classical paths that satisfy the boundary conditions of the path integral. Others have gotten around this problem by reevaluating the action. In this work it is shown that it is not necessary to reevaluate the action because the stationary phase approximation is applicable so long as the path, about which the expansion is performed, satisfies the associated Lagrange's equations of motion. It is not necessary for this path to satisfy the boundary conditions in order to apply the stationary phase approximation.
The extremal paths that arise in the stationary phase evaluation of coherent state path integrals do not seem to have a simple physical interpretation, in contrast to the extremal paths that occur in the conventional path integrals. On the other hand, a recently derived semiclassical formula for the coherent state propagator involves a path that is determined in exactly the same manner as the extremal paths of the conventional path integrals. Since both the semiclassical and the stationary phase analyses yield asymptotic (h(cross) to 0) approximations, the stationary phase and the semiclassical expressions for the propagator should be identical. The author presents a simple and direct proof that, in spite of the apparent differences, this is indeed the case. The simplification in the semiclassical formula is due to the utilisation of an appropriate set of canonical variables to describe the classical dynamics. In order to illustrate the usefulness of the semiclassical formula they present an application to the problem of the degenerate parametric amplifier, which had been treated before by operator ordering and path integral methods. The semiclassical approach has a simple classical interpretation that is absent in the alternative treatments.
The definition and interpretation of canonical, phase space path integrals has evolved over many years to achieve a form that now admits a correct and rigorous formulation, which is also covariant under canonical coordinate transformations. Such formulations involve coherent state representations, which, in their modern version, were originally introduced as an alternative tool to construct phase space path integrals. Moreover, coherent state representations lead to physical interpretations that are more natural than those afforded by more traditional representations. Suitable continuous time regularization procedures lead to a covariant phase space path integral formulation that greatly clarifies the vague phrase that canonical quantization requires Cartesian coordinates.