Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Modern Physics B

HIGH-ORDER COUPLED CLUSTER RESULTS FOR QUANTUM ANTIFERROMAGNETS AND THEIR PHASE TRANSITIONS

R. F. Bishop, DAMIAN J. J. FARNELL

Published May 10, 2001• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The normal coupled cluster method is implemented to high orders in a systematic approximation scheme, and is shown to give accurate ground- and excited-state properties of anisotropic Heisenberg antiferromagnets and their quantum phase transitions at zero temperature.
DOI
10.1142/s021797920100588x

Related papers

HIGH-ORDER COUPLED CLUSTER RESULTS FOR QUANTUM ANTIFERROMAGNETS AND THEIR PHASE TRANSITIONS

R. F. Bishop, DAMIAN J. J. FARNELL

Recent Progress in Many-Body Theories•Sep 1, 2000•0 citations

High-order coupled-cluster method for general spin-lattice problems: An illustration via the anisotropic Heisenberg model

DAMIAN J. J. FARNELL, Klaus A. Gernoth, R. F. Bishop

A high-order coupled cluster method (CCM) for the zero-temperature ground states of quantum lattice spin systems of general spin quantum number $(s>~1/2)$ is described and illustrated via the spin-1 anisotropic Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the square lattice. Results for the ground-state energy and sublattice magnetization are seen to be in excellent agreement with the best of other approximate methods. Furthermore, we are able to follow the solution to the CCM equations at a given level of approximation with respect to the anisotropy parameter $\ensuremath{\Delta}$ from the trivial Ising limit $(\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\ensuremath{\Delta}}\ensuremath{\infty})$ down to a critical value ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{c},$ at which point the physical solution terminates. The results for the ground-state energy, sublattice magnetization, and phase transition point thus support our choice of this model as a good nontrivial test case of our CCM formalism.

Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Oct 15, 2001•30 citations

FRUSTRATED QUANTUM ANTIFERROMAGNETS: APPLICATION OF HIGH-ORDER COUPLED CLUSTER METHOD

Johannes Richter, R. DARRADI, R. ZINKE +1 more

We report on recent results for strongly frustrated quantum J1 - J2 antiferromagnets in dimensionality d = 1, 2, 3 obtained by the coupled cluster method (CCM). We demonstrate that the CCM in high orders of approximation allows us to investigate quantum phase transitions driven by frustration and to discuss novel quantum ground states. In detail we consider the ground-state properties of (i) the Heisenberg spin-1/2 antiferromagnet on the cubic lattice in d = 1, 2, 3, and use the results for the energy, the sublattice magnetization and the spin stiffness as a benchmark test for the precision of the method; (ii) coupled frustrated spin chains (the quasi-one-dimensional J1 - J2 model) and discuss the influence of the quantum fluctuations and the interchain coupling on the incommensurate spiral state present in the classical model; (iii) the Shastry-Sutherland antiferromagnet on the square lattice; and (iv) a stacked frustrated square-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet (the quasi-two-dimensional J1 - J2 model), and discuss the influence of the interlayer coupling on the quantum paramagnetic ground-state phase that is present for the strictly two-dimensional model.

arXiv:cond-mat/0612146•International Journal of Modern Physics B•May 30, 2007•18 citations

An ab initio coupled cluster theory of quantum spin lattices and their quantum critical behaviour

R. F. Bishop, DAMIAN J. J. FARNELL

Strongly interacting quantum spin–lattice models exhibit a wide variety of phases with diverse and subtle magnetic ordering properties. Their detailed description within a unified microscopic framework poses a real challenge for the many-body theorist. By specific application to the spin-½ anisotropic Heisenberg model on a square lattice, we show how the ab initio coupled cluster method, which has already been very successfully applied to a wide variety of quantum many-body and field-theoretic systems, may be very efficiently and systematically implemented for spin–lattice models. Results for such local properties as the ground-state energy and sublattice magnetization are thereby obtained which are on a par with those from the best of the available alternative methods. Furthermore, we demonstrate explicitly how the coupled cluster method now also provides an effective and fully microscopic tool to yield systematic and accurate estimates of the zero-temperature quantum phase transition boundaries between states of different quantum order, as well as of the critical behaviour of the system in the vicinity of the transition points.

Molecular Physics•May 1, 1998•1 citation

Many-body correlations in quantum antiferromagnets: A microscopic coupled-cluster approach

R. F. Bishop, John B. Parkinson, Yang Xian

The coupled-cluster method of many-body theory is applied to anisotropic quantum antiferromagnets in one and two dimensions. It is found to give good results for ground-state and excited-state energies and the staggered magnetization. It also gives a qualitatively correct description of the entire one-dimensional Heisenberg-Ising phase and the phase change in one dimension as the anisotropy decreases.

Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Jun 1, 1991•59 citations

Coupled-cluster treatments of correlations in quantum antiferromagnets

R. F. Bishop, John B. Parkinson, Yang Xian

The coupled-cluster method (CCM) is applied to anisotropic-quantum-antiferromagnetic models in one and two dimensions (1D and 2D). Several hierarchical approximation schemes of the CCM are defined, which are specialized for the spin-lattice models. Good results are obtained for both ground-state and excited-state energies. The spin-spin correlation functions and the staggered magnetizations are also calculated. We have found that the CCM gives a qualitatively correct description of the entire Heisenberg-Ising phase, including the critical point where a phase transition occurs in 1D. Some interesting differences between 1D and 2D models near the critical point are discussed.

Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Nov 1, 1991•88 citations
A high-order coupled cluster method (CCM) for the zero-temperature ground states of quantum lattice spin systems of general spin quantum number (s> 1/2)(s>~1/2)(s> 1/2) is described and illustrated via the spin-1 anisotropic Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the square lattice. Results for the ground-state energy and sublattice magnetization are seen to be in excellent agreement with the best of other approximate methods. Furthermore, we are able to follow the solution to the CCM equations at a given level of approximation with respect to the anisotropy parameter $\ensuremath{\Delta}$ from the trivial Ising limit $(\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\ensuremath{\Delta}}\ensuremath{\infty})$ down to a critical value ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{c},$ at which point the physical solution terminates. The results for the ground-state energy, sublattice magnetization, and phase transition point thus support our choice of this model as a good nontrivial test case of our CCM formalism.
We report on recent results for strongly frustrated quantum J1 - J2 antiferromagnets in dimensionality d = 1, 2, 3 obtained by the coupled cluster method (CCM). We demonstrate that the CCM in high orders of approximation allows us to investigate quantum phase transitions driven by frustration and to discuss novel quantum ground states. In detail we consider the ground-state properties of (i) the Heisenberg spin-1/2 antiferromagnet on the cubic lattice in d = 1, 2, 3, and use the results for the energy, the sublattice magnetization and the spin stiffness as a benchmark test for the precision of the method; (ii) coupled frustrated spin chains (the quasi-one-dimensional J1 - J2 model) and discuss the influence of the quantum fluctuations and the interchain coupling on the incommensurate spiral state present in the classical model; (iii) the Shastry-Sutherland antiferromagnet on the square lattice; and (iv) a stacked frustrated square-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet (the quasi-two-dimensional J1 - J2 model), and discuss the influence of the interlayer coupling on the quantum paramagnetic ground-state phase that is present for the strictly two-dimensional model.
Strongly interacting quantum spin–lattice models exhibit a wide variety of phases with diverse and subtle magnetic ordering properties. Their detailed description within a unified microscopic framework poses a real challenge for the many-body theorist. By specific application to the spin-½ anisotropic Heisenberg model on a square lattice, we show how the ab initio coupled cluster method, which has already been very successfully applied to a wide variety of quantum many-body and field-theoretic systems, may be very efficiently and systematically implemented for spin–lattice models. Results for such local properties as the ground-state energy and sublattice magnetization are thereby obtained which are on a par with those from the best of the available alternative methods. Furthermore, we demonstrate explicitly how the coupled cluster method now also provides an effective and fully microscopic tool to yield systematic and accurate estimates of the zero-temperature quantum phase transition boundaries between states of different quantum order, as well as of the critical behaviour of the system in the vicinity of the transition points.
The coupled-cluster method (CCM) is applied to anisotropic-quantum-antiferromagnetic models in one and two dimensions (1D and 2D). Several hierarchical approximation schemes of the CCM are defined, which are specialized for the spin-lattice models. Good results are obtained for both ground-state and excited-state energies. The spin-spin correlation functions and the staggered magnetizations are also calculated. We have found that the CCM gives a qualitatively correct description of the entire Heisenberg-Ising phase, including the critical point where a phase transition occurs in 1D. Some interesting differences between 1D and 2D models near the critical point are discussed.