Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

The Geometry of the Quantum Paradoxes

John Conway, Simon Kochen

Published Jan 1, 2002• 44 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-662-05032-3_18

Related papers

量化信息悖论的量子几何建模

Jincheng Zhang

This paper explores the intricate relationship between quantum information and geometric modeling, focusing on the potential of quantum geometry to address the infamous quantum information paradox. We propose a novel algorithm leveraging quantum entanglement and geometric principles to simulate and predict the paradoxical nature of quantum information. The core mechanism involves constructing a quantum geometry model, specifically designed to capture the essence of quantum information's inherent fragility and non-locality. This approach offers a potential pathway to understanding and potentially mitigating the paradox, providing a new framework for research and development in quantum information theory. The paper concludes with a discussion of the challenges and future directions of this research.

•Aug 31, 2026•0 citations

The Nature of Quantum Paradoxes

Van der Merwe, Alwyn, Gino Tarozzi

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1988•9 citations

The Paradoxes of Quantum Mechanics

Luigi E. Picasso

UNITEXT for physics•Oct 26, 2015•0 citations

Classical geometric resolution of the Einstein—Podolsky—Rosen paradox

Yuval Ne’eman

I show that, in the geometry of a fiber bundle describing a gauge theory, curvature and parallel transport ensure and impose nonseparability. The "Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox" is thus resolved "classically." I conjecture that the ostentatiously "implausible" features of the quantum treatment are due to the fact that space-time separability, a basic assumption of single-particle nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, does not fit the bundle geometry of the complete physics.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences•Nov 1, 1983•5 citations

Quantum Paradoxes and Physical Reality

F. Selleri

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1990•121 citations

Information Recovery in Holographic Attention: Island Formula, Page Curves, and Quantum Error Correction

Ariel

Papers 1 and 2 of this series established that transformer attention implements holographic geometry (Ryu-Takayanagi formula) and that attention is physically equivalent to quantum measurement. Here we address the dynamical question: what happens to information in a holographic attention structure over time? The island formula — the 2019-2020 resolution of the black hole information paradox — contains the same RT formula as Paper 1's central ingredient. Applied to our holographic attention code, it yields: (1) The information paradox for attention structures is resolved by the same mechanism as the black hole paradox. (2) The Page curve describes the entropy trajectory of distributed information — calculable from the RT formula. (3) The quantum error correction structure (Almheiri, Dong, Harlow 2015) gives the exact reconstruction threshold: the entanglement wedge condition. (4) The Page-Wootters mechanism provides a precise account of time in this framework. Together, the three papers close a loop: attention produces geometry (Paper 1), maintains geometry (Paper 2), and attention history determines whether geometry can be recovered (Paper 3). Preliminary version — expert review requested.

•Mar 6, 2026•0 citations
This paper explores the intricate relationship between quantum information and geometric modeling, focusing on the potential of quantum geometry to address the infamous quantum information paradox. We propose a novel algorithm leveraging quantum entanglement and geometric principles to simulate and predict the paradoxical nature of quantum information. The core mechanism involves constructing a quantum geometry model, specifically designed to capture the essence of quantum information's inherent fragility and non-locality. This approach offers a potential pathway to understanding and potentially mitigating the paradox, providing a new framework for research and development in quantum information theory. The paper concludes with a discussion of the challenges and future directions of this research.
I show that, in the geometry of a fiber bundle describing a gauge theory, curvature and parallel transport ensure and impose nonseparability. The "Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox" is thus resolved "classically." I conjecture that the ostentatiously "implausible" features of the quantum treatment are due to the fact that space-time separability, a basic assumption of single-particle nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, does not fit the bundle geometry of the complete physics.
Papers 1 and 2 of this series established that transformer attention implements holographic geometry (Ryu-Takayanagi formula) and that attention is physically equivalent to quantum measurement. Here we address the dynamical question: what happens to information in a holographic attention structure over time? The island formula — the 2019-2020 resolution of the black hole information paradox — contains the same RT formula as Paper 1's central ingredient. Applied to our holographic attention code, it yields: (1) The information paradox for attention structures is resolved by the same mechanism as the black hole paradox. (2) The Page curve describes the entropy trajectory of distributed information — calculable from the RT formula. (3) The quantum error correction structure (Almheiri, Dong, Harlow 2015) gives the exact reconstruction threshold: the entanglement wedge condition. (4) The Page-Wootters mechanism provides a precise account of time in this framework. Together, the three papers close a loop: attention produces geometry (Paper 1), maintains geometry (Paper 2), and attention history determines whether geometry can be recovered (Paper 3). Preliminary version — expert review requested.