Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lithuanian Mathematical Journal

Probability structures in subspace lattice approach to foundations of quantum theory

Ekaterina Aleksandrovna Turilova

Published Apr 1, 2015• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s10986-015-9279-7

Related papers

Quantum Sheaves - An Outline of Results

Hans F. de Groote

In this paper we start with the development of a theory of presheaves on a lattice, in particular on the quantum lattice $\LL(\kH)$ of closed subspaces of a complex Hilbert space $\kH$, and their associated etale spaces. Even in this early state the theory has interesting applications to the theory of operator algebras and the foundations of quantum mechanics. Among other things we can show that classical observables (continuous functions on a topological space) and quantum observables (selfadjoint linear operators on a Hilbert space) are on the same structural footing.

arXiv:math-ph/0110035•Oct 30, 2001•5 citations

On the Lattice Structure of Probability Spaces in Quantum Mechanics

Federico Holik, César Massri, Angel Ricardo Plastino +1 more

arXiv:1112.4616•International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Aug 8, 2012•20 citations

Foundations of a Quantum Probability Theory

M. D. Srinivas

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1979•1 citation

Probability in quantum mechanics

J. V. Corbett

Quantum mechanics is usually described in the terminology of probability theory even though the properties of the probability spaces associated with it are fundamentally different from the standard ones of probability theory. For example, Kolmogorov's axioms are not general enough to encompass the non-commutative situations that arise in quantum theory. There have been many attempts to generalise these axioms to meet the needs of quantum mechanics. The focus of these attempts has been the observation, first made by Birkhoff and von Neumann (1936), that the propositions associated with a quantum-mechanical system do not form a Boolean σ-algebra. There is almost universal agreement that the probability space associated with a quantum-mechanical system is given by the set of subspaces of a separable Hilbert space, but there is disagreement over the algebraic structure that this set represents. In the most popular model for the probability space of quantum mechanics the propositions are assumed to form an orthocomplemented lattice (Mackey (1963), Jauch (1968)). The fundamental concept here is that of a partial order, that is a binary relation that is reflexive and transitive but not symmetric. The partial order is interpreted as embodying the logical concept of implication in the set of propositions associated with the physical system. Although this model provides an acceptable mathematical expression of the probabilistic structure of quantum mechanics in that the subspaces of a separable Hilbert space give a representation of an ortho-complemented lattice, it has several deficiencies which will be discussed later.

Advances in Applied Probability•Dec 1, 1978•1 citation

Quantum probabilities as Dempster-Shafer probabilities in the lattice of subspaces

Apostol Vourdas

The orthocomplemented modular lattice of subspaces ${\cal L}[H(d)]$L[H(d)], of a quantum system with d-dimensional Hilbert space H(d), is considered. A generalized additivity relation which holds for Kolmogorov probabilities is violated by quantum probabilities in the full lattice ${\cal L}[H(d)]$L[H(d)] (it is only valid within the Boolean subalgebras of ${\cal L}[H(d)]$L[H(d)]). This suggests the use of more general (than Kolmogorov) probability theories, and here the Dempster-Shafer probability theory is adopted. An operator ${\mathfrak {D}}(H_1, H_2)$D(H1,H2), which quantifies deviations from Kolmogorov probability theory is introduced, and it is shown to be intimately related to the commutator of the projectors ${\mathfrak {P}}(H_1), {\mathfrak {P}}(H_2)$P(H1),P(H2), to the subspaces H1, H2. As an application, it is shown that the proof of the inequalities of Clauser, Horne, Shimony, and Holt for a system of two spin 1/2 particles is valid for Kolmogorov probabilities, but it is not valid for Dempster-Shafer probabilities. The violation of these inequalities in experiments supports the interpretation of quantum probabilities as Dempster-Shafer probabilities.

arXiv:1410.2044•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Aug 1, 2014•35 citations

Quantum Probability and The Foundations of Quantum Theory

Luigi Accardi

Boston studies in the philosophy of science•Jan 1, 1990•3 citations
In this paper we start with the development of a theory of presheaves on a lattice, in particular on the quantum lattice $\LL(\kH)$ of closed subspaces of a complex Hilbert space $\kH$, and their associated etale spaces. Even in this early state the theory has interesting applications to the theory of operator algebras and the foundations of quantum mechanics. Among other things we can show that classical observables (continuous functions on a topological space) and quantum observables (selfadjoint linear operators on a Hilbert space) are on the same structural footing.
Quantum mechanics is usually described in the terminology of probability theory even though the properties of the probability spaces associated with it are fundamentally different from the standard ones of probability theory. For example, Kolmogorov's axioms are not general enough to encompass the non-commutative situations that arise in quantum theory. There have been many attempts to generalise these axioms to meet the needs of quantum mechanics. The focus of these attempts has been the observation, first made by Birkhoff and von Neumann (1936), that the propositions associated with a quantum-mechanical system do not form a Boolean σ-algebra. There is almost universal agreement that the probability space associated with a quantum-mechanical system is given by the set of subspaces of a separable Hilbert space, but there is disagreement over the algebraic structure that this set represents. In the most popular model for the probability space of quantum mechanics the propositions are assumed to form an orthocomplemented lattice (Mackey (1963), Jauch (1968)). The fundamental concept here is that of a partial order, that is a binary relation that is reflexive and transitive but not symmetric. The partial order is interpreted as embodying the logical concept of implication in the set of propositions associated with the physical system. Although this model provides an acceptable mathematical expression of the probabilistic structure of quantum mechanics in that the subspaces of a separable Hilbert space give a representation of an ortho-complemented lattice, it has several deficiencies which will be discussed later.
The orthocomplemented modular lattice of subspaces L[H(d)]{\cal L}[H(d)]L[H(d)]L[H(d)], of a quantum system with d-dimensional Hilbert space H(d), is considered. A generalized additivity relation which holds for Kolmogorov probabilities is violated by quantum probabilities in the full lattice L[H(d)]{\cal L}[H(d)]L[H(d)]L[H(d)] (it is only valid within the Boolean subalgebras of L[H(d)]{\cal L}[H(d)]L[H(d)]L[H(d)]). This suggests the use of more general (than Kolmogorov) probability theories, and here the Dempster-Shafer probability theory is adopted. An operator D(H1,H2){\mathfrak {D}}(H_1, H_2)D(H1​,H2​)D(H1,H2), which quantifies deviations from Kolmogorov probability theory is introduced, and it is shown to be intimately related to the commutator of the projectors P(H1),P(H2){\mathfrak {P}}(H_1), {\mathfrak {P}}(H_2)P(H1​),P(H2​)P(H1),P(H2), to the subspaces H1, H2. As an application, it is shown that the proof of the inequalities of Clauser, Horne, Shimony, and Holt for a system of two spin 1/2 particles is valid for Kolmogorov probabilities, but it is not valid for Dempster-Shafer probabilities. The violation of these inequalities in experiments supports the interpretation of quantum probabilities as Dempster-Shafer probabilities.