We consider the asymptotic behavior of the polarization process for polar codes when the blocklength tends to infinity. In particular, we study the asymptotics of the cumulative distribution P(Zn≤ z), where Zn= Z(Wn) is the Bhattacharyya process, and its dependence on the rate of transmission R. We show that for a BMS channel W, for Rn→8P (Zn≤ 2-2n/2+√n(Q-1(R/I(W)/2)+o(√n))) = R and for Rn→8P (Zn≤ 2-2n/2+√n(Q-1(R/I(W)/2)+o(√n))) = R, where Q(x) is the probability that a standard normal random variable exceeds x. As a result, if we denote by PeSC(n,R) the probability of error using polar codes of block-length N = 2nand rate ReSC(n,R))) scales as n/2+√n(Q-1(R/I(W)/2)+o(√n)). We also prove that the same result holds for the block error probability using the MAP decoder, i.e., for log(-log(PeMAP(n,R))).
We consider the asymptotic behavior of the polarization process for polar codes when the blocklength tends to infinity. In particular, we study the asymptotics of the cumulative distribution P(Zn≤ z), where Zn= Z(Wn) is the Bhattacharyya process, and its dependence on the rate of transmission R. We show that for a BMS channel W, for Rn→8P (Zn≤ 2-2n/2+√n(Q-1(R/I(W)/2)+o(√n))) = R and for Rn→8P (Zn≤ 2-2n/2+√n(Q-1(R/I(W)/2)+o(√n))) = R, where Q(x) is the probability that a standard normal random variable exceeds x. As a result, if we denote by PeSC(n,R) the probability of error using polar codes of block-length N = 2nand rate ReSC(n,R))) scales as n/2+√n(Q-1(R/I(W)/2)+o(√n)). We also prove that the same result holds for the block error probability using the MAP decoder, i.e., for log(-log(PeMAP(n,R))).
We consider the asymptotic behavior of the polarization process for polar codes when the blocklength tends to infinity. In particular, we study the problem of asymptotic analysis of the cumulative distribution P(Zn≤z), where Zn=Z(Wn) is the Bhattacharyya process, and its dependence to the rate of transmission R. We show that for a BMS channel W, for R<I(W) we have limn→∞P(Zn≤2−22n+n2Q−1(I(W)R)+o(n))=R and for R<1−I(W) we have limn→∞P(Zn≥1−2−22n+n2Q−1(1−I(W)R)+o(n))=R, where Q(x) is the probability that a standard normal random variable will obtain a value larger than x. As a result, if we denote by PeSC(n,R) the probability of error using polar codes of block-length N=2n and rate $R
Consider a binary-input memoryless output-symmetric channel W. Such a channel has a capacity, call it I(W), and for any R<I(W) and strictly positive constant Pe we know that we can construct a coding scheme that allows transmission at rate R with an error probability not exceeding Pe. Assume now that we let the rate R tend to I(W) and we ask how we have to "scale" the blocklength N in order to keep the error probability fixed to Pe. We refer to this as the "finite-length scaling" behavior. This question was addressed by Strassen as well as Polyanskiy, Poor and Verdu, and the result is that N must grow at least as the square of the reciprocal of I(W)−R. Polar codes are optimal in the sense that they achieve capacity. In this paper, we are asking to what degree they are also optimal in terms of their finite-length behavior. Our approach is based on analyzing the dynamics of the un-polarized channels. The main results of this paper can be summarized as follows. Consider the sum of Bhattacharyya parameters of sub-channels chosen (by the polar coding scheme) to transmit information. If we require this sum to be smaller than a given value Pe>0, then the required block-length N scales in terms of the rate R<I(W) as N≥(I(W)−R)μα, where α is a positive constant that depends on Pe and I(W), and μ=3.579. Also, we show that with the same requirement on the sum of Bhattacharyya parameters, the block-length scales in terms of the rate like N≤(I(W)−R)μβ, where β is a constant that depends on Pe and I(W), and μ=6.
Consider a binary-input memoryless output-symmetric channelW. Such a channel has a capacity, call itI(W), and for anyR<I(W)and strictly positive constantPewe know that we can construct a coding scheme that allows transmission at rateRwith an error probability not exceedingPe. Assume now that we let the rateRtend toI(W)and we ask how we have to scale the blocklengthNin order to keep the error probability fixed toPe. We refer to this as the finite-length scaling behavior. This question was addressed by Strassen as well as Polyanskiy, Poor, and Verdu, and the result is thatNmust grow at least as the square of the reciprocal ofI(W)−R. Polar codes are optimal in the sense that they achieve capacity. In this paper, we are asking to what degree they are also optimal in terms of their finite-length behavior. Since the exact scaling behavior depends on the choice of the channel, our objective is to provide scaling laws that hold universally for all binary-input memoryless output-symmetric channels. Our approach is based on analyzing the dynamics of the un-polarized channels. More precisely, we provide bounds on (the exponent of) the number of subchannels whose Bhattacharyya constant falls in a fixed interval[a,b]. Mathematically, this can be stated as bounding the sequence{1/nlogPr(Zn∈[a,b])}n∈N, whereZnis the Bhattacharyya process. We then use these bounds to derive tradeoffs between the rate and the block-length. The main results of this paper can be summarized as follows. Consider the sum of Bhattacharyya parameters of subchannels chosen (by the polar coding scheme) to transmit information. If we require this sum to be smaller than a given valuePe>0, then the required block-lengthNscales in terms of the rateR<I(W)asN≥α/(I(W)−R)μ, whereαis a positive constant that depends onPeandI(W). We show thatμ=3.579is a valid choice, and we conjecture that indeed the value ofμcan be improved toμ=3.627, the parameter for the binary erasure channel. Also, we show that with the same requirement on the sum of Bhattacharyya parameters, the block-length scales in terms of the rate likeN≤β/(I(W)−R)μ, whereβis a constant that depends onPeandI(W), andμ=6.
Consider the transmission of a polar code of block length N and rate R over a binary memoryless symmetric channel W and let Pebe the block error probability under successive cancellation decoding. In this paper, we develop new bounds that characterize the relationship of the parameters R, N, Pe, and the quality of the channel W quantified by its capacity I(W) and its Bhattacharyya parameter Z(W). In previous work, two main regimes were studied. In the error exponent regime, the channel W and the rate R-√N. In the scaling exponent approach, the channel W and the error probability Pe are fixed and it was proved that the gap to capacity I(W) - R scales as N-1/μ. Here, μ is called scaling exponent and this scaling exponent depends on the channel W. A heuristic computation for the binary erasure channel (BEC) gives μ = 3.627 and it was shown that, for any channel W, 3.579 ≤ μ ≤ 5.702. Our contributions are as follows. First, we provide the tighter upper bound μ <;≤ 4.714 valid for any W. With the same technique, we obtain the upper bound μ ≤ 3.639 for the case of the BEC; this upper bound approaches very closely the heuristically derived value for the scaling exponent of the erasure channel. Second, we develop a trade-off between the gap to capacity I(W)- R and the error probability Pe as the functions of the block length N. In other words, we neither fix the gap to capacity (error exponent regime) nor the error probability (scaling exponent regime), but we do consider a moderate deviations regime in which we study how fast both quantities, as the functions of the block length N, simultaneously go to 0. Third, we prove that polar codes are not affected by error floors. To do so, we fix a polar code of block length N and rate R. Then, we vary the channel W and study the impact of this variation on the error probability. We show that the error probability Pe scales as the Bhattacharyya parameter Z(W) raised to a power that scales roughly like VN. This agrees with the scaling in the error exponent regime.
We provide upper and lower bounds on the escape rate of the Bhattacharyya process corresponding to polar codes where transmission takes place over the the binary erasure channel. More precisely, we bound the exponent of the number of sub-channels whose Bhattacharyya constant falls in a fixed interval [a, b]. Mathematically this can be stated as bounding the limit limn→∞1/n ln P(Zn∈ [a, b]), where Znis the Bhattacharyya process. The quantity P(Zn∈ [a, b]) represents the fraction of sub-channels that are still un-polarized at time n.
We consider the problem of determining the trade-off between the rate and the block-length of polar codes for a given block error probability when we use the successive cancellation decoder. We take the sum of the Bhattacharyya parameters as a proxy for the block error probability, and show that there exists a universal parameter μ such that for any binary memoryless symmetric channel W with capacity I(W), reliable communication requires rates that satisfy R<I(W)−αN−μ1, where α is a positive constant and N is the block-length. We provide lower bounds on μ, namely μ≥3.553, and we conjecture that indeed μ=3.627, the parameter for the binary erasure channel.