Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry

Bonded tableau unitary group approach to the many‐electron correlation problem

Xiangzhu Li, Qianer Zhang

Published Nov 1, 1989• 69 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract A spin‐free symmetry‐adapted valence bond (VB) state, named bonded tableau (BT), is deduced from the classical bonded function and labeled by an at most two‐column Weyl tableau. The complete set, which is composed of the BT basis or canonical bonded tableau (CBT), can be constructed from an overcomplete set of BT states. CI CBT and VB CBT are two kinds of complete sets that are constructed in this paper. They can be used, respectively, in the CI and VB theory. It is shown that there is a one‐to‐one correspondence between the labeling scheme for CI CBT and the Gelfand–Tsetlin (GT) basis. This relationship enables an efficient generation and compact representation of the BT basis if one desires to use the known global representation scheme for the GT basis. Effective algorithms for the matrix element evaluation of unitary group generators and products of generators between BT states are presented. In the formulation, the action of a generator on a BT state yields another BT state times a coefficient, so that the matrix elements of an arbitrary multiple product of generators are reduced to a calculation of the overlaps between BT states. The evaluation of the overlaps leads to a simple factorization into cycle contributions, whose values are given explicitly and only depend on the length parameters of the cycles. It is hoped that the presented formalism can facilitate the procedures for handling of the many‐electron correlation problem.

DOI
10.1002/qua.560360507

Related papers

BONDED TABLEAU AND UNITARY GROUP APPROACH FOR MANY-ELECTRON PROBLEMS

Q Hang

A unitary group approach based on the so-called bonded tableaux (VB) states is described. Several different realizations of the bonded tableaux are discussed and their relations are pointed out. From a viewpoint of the symmetric group we reveal a simple structure of the matrix elements of unitary group generators and generator products. This structure makes an efficient approach to the matrix element evaluation.

Science China Chemistry•Jan 1, 1990•0 citations

Unitary group approach to spin‐adapted open‐shell coupled cluster theory

Bogumił Jeziorski, Josef Paldus, Piotr Jankowski

Abstract We show that the irreducible tensor operators of the unitary group provide a natural operator basis for the exponential Ansatz which preserves the spin symmetry of the reference state, requires a minimal number of independent cluster amplitudes for each substitution order, and guarantees the invariance of the correlation energy under unitary transformations of core, open‐shell, and virtual orbitals. When acting on the closed‐shell reference state with nc doubly occupied and nv unoccupied (virtual) orbitals, the irreducible tensor operators of the group U(nc) ⊗ U(nV) generate all Gelfand‐Tsetlin (GT) states corresponding to appropriate irreducible representation of U(nc + nv). The tensor operators generating the M‐tuply excited states are easily constructed by symmetrizing products of M unitary group generators with the Wigner operators of the symmetric group SM. This provides an alternative to the Nagel‐Moshinsky construction of the GT basis. Since the corresponding cluster amplitudes, which are also U(nc) ⊗ U(ns) tensors, can be shown to be connected, the irreducible tensor operators of U(nc) ⊗ U(nv) represent a convenient basis for a spin‐adapted full coupled cluster calculation for closed‐shell systems. For a high‐spin reference determinant with n, singly occupied open‐shell orbitals, the corresponding representation of U(n), n=nc + nv + ns is not simply reducible under the group U(nc) ⊗ U(ns) ⊗ U(nv). The multiplicity problem is resolved using the group chain U(n) ⊃ U(nc + nv) ⊗ U(ns) ⊃ U(nc) ⊗U(ns)⊗ U(nv) ⊗ U(nv). The labeling of the resulting configuration‐state functions (which, in general, are not GT states when nc > 1) by the irreducible representations of the intermediate group U(nc + nv) ⊗U(ns) turns out to be equivalent to the classification based on the order of interaction with the reference state. The irreducible tensor operators defined by the above chain and corresponding to single, double, and triple substitutions from the first‐, second‐, and third‐order interacting spaces are explicitly constructed from the U(n) generators. The connectedness of the corresponding cluster amplitudes and, consequently, the size extensivity of the resulting spin‐adapted open‐shell coupled cluster theory are proved using group theoretical arguments. The perturbation expansion of the resulting coupled cluster equations leads to an explicitly connected form of the spin‐restricted open‐shell many‐body perturbation theory. Approximation schemes leading to manageable computational procedures are proposed and their relation to perturbation theory is discussed. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Nov 5, 1995•79 citations

Spin‐Free quantum chemistry. XVIII. The unitary group formulation of the many‐electron problem

F. A. Matsen

Abstract The representation of an N‐electron Schrödinger Hamiltonian on an orthonormal, spin‐free (freon) orbital product space is exactly modeled by a second‐degree polynomial in the infinitesimal generators of the unitary group. Symmetry adaptation of the orbital product space with respect to the symmetric group yields Gel'fand states which provide base for irreducible represntations of the unitary group. These exist in closed form as, in consequence, does the representation of the model Hamiltonian in this same basis. We retain as physical only those states characterized by tableaux with no more than two columns for which the spin labelling is one‐half the difference in the lengths of the two columns. The unitary group formulation is equivalent to standard, number‐conserving, second‐quantized, many‐body theory.

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•May 1, 1976•34 citations

Diagrammatic valence‐bond theory for finite model Hamiltonians

S. Ramasesha, Z. G. Soos

Abstract Valence bond (VB) diagrams form a complete basis for model Hamiltonians that conserve total spin, S, and have one valence state, ϕp, per site. Hubbard and Pariser–Parr–Pople (PPP) models illustrate ionic problems, with zero, one, or two electrons in each ϕp, while isotropic Heisenberg models illustrate spin problems, with only purely covalent VB diagrams. The difficulty of nonorthogonal VB diagrams is by‐passed by exploiting the finite dimensionality of the complete basis and working with unsymmetric sparse matrices. We introduce efficient bit manipulations for generating, storing, and handling VB diagrams as integers and describe a new coordinate relaxation method for the ground and lowest excited states of unsymmetric sparse matrices. Antiferromagnetic spin‐½ Heisenberg rings and chains of N ⩽ 20 spins, or 2N spin functions, are solved in C2 symmetry as illustrative examples. The lowest S = 1 and 0 excitations are related to domain walls, or spin solitons, and studied for alternations corresponding to polyacetylene. VB diagrams with arbitrary S and nonneighbor interactions are constructed for both spin and ionic problems, thus extending diagrammatic VB theory to other topologies.

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jun 1, 1984•112 citations

Many-body valence-bond theory

Douglas J. Klein, H. Zhu, Roser Valentí +1 more

The classical theory of chemical valence, first, is naturally formalized in mathematics in the area of graph theory and, second, finds an extension in quantum mechanics in terms of the Heitler–London–Pauling “valence-bond” (VB) theory. Thus, VB theory stands in a fairly unique position, although in quantum chemistry, there often has been a preference for the alternative (perhaps even “complementary”) molecular orbital (MO) theory, presumably in large part because of computational efficacy for general molecular structures. Indeed, as formulated by Pauling and others, VB theory was described as a configuration interaction (CI) problem when there were multiple relevant classical valence structures for the same molecular structure. Also, as now recognized, a direct assault on CI is computationally intensive, prone to size-inconsistency problems, and effectively limited to smaller systems—whereas indirect approaches, e.g., via wave-function cluster expansions or renormalization-group theory, often neatly avoid these problems. Thus, what is (and perhaps always has been) needed is “many-body” schemes for VB computations (as well as for higher-order MO-based approaches, too). Here, then, certain such many-body VB-amenable computational schemes are to be discussed, in the context of semiempirical (explicitly correlated) graphical models. The collection of models are described and interrelated in a fairly comprehensive systematic manner. A selection of many-body cluster expansion methods are then discussed with special reference to resonating VB wave functions and the fundamental graph-theoretic nature of the consequent problems (such as also are noted to arise in lattice-discretized statistical-mechanical problems, too). Some examples are described incorporating resonance among exponentially great numbers of VB structures as applied: for large icosahedral-symmetry fullerenic structures, for the (polyacetylenic) linear chain, and for ladderlike conjugated polymers. It is contended that practicable many-body VB-theoretic methods are now available, retaining clear links to classical chemical valence theory. Hopefully, too, these methods may soon find use beyond the semi-empirical framework. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Quant Chem 65: 421–438, 1997

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jan 1, 1997•27 citations

Symmetry adaptation of correlated states in the valence bond basis

S. Ramasesha, Z. G. Soos

Symmetry-adapted linear combinations of valence-bond (VB) diagrams are constructed for arbitrary point groups and total spin S using diagrammatic VB methods. VB diagrams are related uniquely to invariant subspaces whose size reflects the number of group elements; their nonorthogonality leads to sparser matrices and is fully incorporated into a binary integer representation. Symmetry-adapated linear combinations of VB diagrams are constructed for the 1764 singlets of a half-filled cube of eight sites, the 2.8 million π-electron singlets of anthracene, and for illustrative S≥0 systems.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Mar 1, 1993•22 citations
Abstract A spin‐free symmetry‐adapted valence bond (VB) state, named bonded tableau (BT), is deduced from the classical bonded function and labeled by an at most two‐column Weyl tableau. The complete set, which is composed of the BT basis or canonical bonded tableau (CBT), can be constructed from an overcomplete set of BT states. CI CBT and VB CBT are two kinds of complete sets that are constructed in this paper. They can be used, respectively, in the CI and VB theory. It is shown that there is a one‐to‐one correspondence between the labeling scheme for CI CBT and the Gelfand–Tsetlin (GT) basis. This relationship enables an efficient generation and compact representation of the BT basis if one desires to use the known global representation scheme for the GT basis. Effective algorithms for the matrix element evaluation of unitary group generators and products of generators between BT states are presented. In the formulation, the action of a generator on a BT state yields another BT state times a coefficient, so that the matrix elements of an arbitrary multiple product of generators are reduced to a calculation of the overlaps between BT states. The evaluation of the overlaps leads to a simple factorization into cycle contributions, whose values are given explicitly and only depend on the length parameters of the cycles. It is hoped that the presented formalism can facilitate the procedures for handling of the many‐electron correlation problem.
Abstract We show that the irreducible tensor operators of the unitary group provide a natural operator basis for the exponential Ansatz which preserves the spin symmetry of the reference state, requires a minimal number of independent cluster amplitudes for each substitution order, and guarantees the invariance of the correlation energy under unitary transformations of core, open‐shell, and virtual orbitals. When acting on the closed‐shell reference state with nc doubly occupied and nv unoccupied (virtual) orbitals, the irreducible tensor operators of the group U(nc) ⊗ U(nV) generate all Gelfand‐Tsetlin (GT) states corresponding to appropriate irreducible representation of U(nc + nv). The tensor operators generating the M‐tuply excited states are easily constructed by symmetrizing products of M unitary group generators with the Wigner operators of the symmetric group SM. This provides an alternative to the Nagel‐Moshinsky construction of the GT basis. Since the corresponding cluster amplitudes, which are also U(nc) ⊗ U(ns) tensors, can be shown to be connected, the irreducible tensor operators of U(nc) ⊗ U(nv) represent a convenient basis for a spin‐adapted full coupled cluster calculation for closed‐shell systems. For a high‐spin reference determinant with n, singly occupied open‐shell orbitals, the corresponding representation of U(n), n=nc + nv + ns is not simply reducible under the group U(nc) ⊗ U(ns) ⊗ U(nv). The multiplicity problem is resolved using the group chain U(n) ⊃ U(nc + nv) ⊗ U(ns) ⊃ U(nc) ⊗U(ns)⊗ U(nv) ⊗ U(nv). The labeling of the resulting configuration‐state functions (which, in general, are not GT states when nc > 1) by the irreducible representations of the intermediate group U(nc + nv) ⊗U(ns) turns out to be equivalent to the classification based on the order of interaction with the reference state. The irreducible tensor operators defined by the above chain and corresponding to single, double, and triple substitutions from the first‐, second‐, and third‐order interacting spaces are explicitly constructed from the U(n) generators. The connectedness of the corresponding cluster amplitudes and, consequently, the size extensivity of the resulting spin‐adapted open‐shell coupled cluster theory are proved using group theoretical arguments. The perturbation expansion of the resulting coupled cluster equations leads to an explicitly connected form of the spin‐restricted open‐shell many‐body perturbation theory. Approximation schemes leading to manageable computational procedures are proposed and their relation to perturbation theory is discussed. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Abstract The representation of an N‐electron Schrödinger Hamiltonian on an orthonormal, spin‐free (freon) orbital product space is exactly modeled by a second‐degree polynomial in the infinitesimal generators of the unitary group. Symmetry adaptation of the orbital product space with respect to the symmetric group yields Gel'fand states which provide base for irreducible represntations of the unitary group. These exist in closed form as, in consequence, does the representation of the model Hamiltonian in this same basis. We retain as physical only those states characterized by tableaux with no more than two columns for which the spin labelling is one‐half the difference in the lengths of the two columns. The unitary group formulation is equivalent to standard, number‐conserving, second‐quantized, many‐body theory.
Abstract Valence bond (VB) diagrams form a complete basis for model Hamiltonians that conserve total spin, S, and have one valence state, ϕp, per site. Hubbard and Pariser–Parr–Pople (PPP) models illustrate ionic problems, with zero, one, or two electrons in each ϕp, while isotropic Heisenberg models illustrate spin problems, with only purely covalent VB diagrams. The difficulty of nonorthogonal VB diagrams is by‐passed by exploiting the finite dimensionality of the complete basis and working with unsymmetric sparse matrices. We introduce efficient bit manipulations for generating, storing, and handling VB diagrams as integers and describe a new coordinate relaxation method for the ground and lowest excited states of unsymmetric sparse matrices. Antiferromagnetic spin‐½ Heisenberg rings and chains of N ⩽ 20 spins, or 2N spin functions, are solved in C2 symmetry as illustrative examples. The lowest S = 1 and 0 excitations are related to domain walls, or spin solitons, and studied for alternations corresponding to polyacetylene. VB diagrams with arbitrary S and nonneighbor interactions are constructed for both spin and ionic problems, thus extending diagrammatic VB theory to other topologies.
The classical theory of chemical valence, first, is naturally formalized in mathematics in the area of graph theory and, second, finds an extension in quantum mechanics in terms of the Heitler–London–Pauling “valence-bond” (VB) theory. Thus, VB theory stands in a fairly unique position, although in quantum chemistry, there often has been a preference for the alternative (perhaps even “complementary”) molecular orbital (MO) theory, presumably in large part because of computational efficacy for general molecular structures. Indeed, as formulated by Pauling and others, VB theory was described as a configuration interaction (CI) problem when there were multiple relevant classical valence structures for the same molecular structure. Also, as now recognized, a direct assault on CI is computationally intensive, prone to size-inconsistency problems, and effectively limited to smaller systems—whereas indirect approaches, e.g., via wave-function cluster expansions or renormalization-group theory, often neatly avoid these problems. Thus, what is (and perhaps always has been) needed is “many-body” schemes for VB computations (as well as for higher-order MO-based approaches, too). Here, then, certain such many-body VB-amenable computational schemes are to be discussed, in the context of semiempirical (explicitly correlated) graphical models. The collection of models are described and interrelated in a fairly comprehensive systematic manner. A selection of many-body cluster expansion methods are then discussed with special reference to resonating VB wave functions and the fundamental graph-theoretic nature of the consequent problems (such as also are noted to arise in lattice-discretized statistical-mechanical problems, too). Some examples are described incorporating resonance among exponentially great numbers of VB structures as applied: for large icosahedral-symmetry fullerenic structures, for the (polyacetylenic) linear chain, and for ladderlike conjugated polymers. It is contended that practicable many-body VB-theoretic methods are now available, retaining clear links to classical chemical valence theory. Hopefully, too, these methods may soon find use beyond the semi-empirical framework. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Quant Chem 65: 421–438, 1997
Symmetry-adapted linear combinations of valence-bond (VB) diagrams are constructed for arbitrary point groups and total spin S using diagrammatic VB methods. VB diagrams are related uniquely to invariant subspaces whose size reflects the number of group elements; their nonorthogonality leads to sparser matrices and is fully incorporated into a binary integer representation. Symmetry-adapated linear combinations of VB diagrams are constructed for the 1764 singlets of a half-filled cube of eight sites, the 2.8 million π-electron singlets of anthracene, and for illustrative S≥0 systems.