Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Chemical Physics Letters

Quantum critical phenomena in the Schrödinger formulation: mapping to classical lattices

Ricardo Andreas Sauerwein, Sabre Kais

Published Jan 1, 2001• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/s0009-2614(00)01411-1

Related papers

Thet-expansion study of critical phenomena in quantum systems

Ladislav Šamaj, Pavol Kalinay, P. Markoš +1 more

For quantum systems in the ground state, the t-expansion technique is used to construct a canonical sequence of classical theories. The consequent application of the coherent-anomaly method provides an estimation of the non-classical values of critical indices related to the singular behaviour of the ground-state energy. The accuracy of the results is tested on the Ising model with a transverse field, formulated on two- and three-dimensional lattices.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Mar 7, 1997•14 citations

Fundamental Problems of Quantum Critical Phenomena

L. De Cesare, Dimo I. Uzunov

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1999•4 citations

Quantum Systems and Critical Phenomena

Giovanni Battimelli, Giovanni Ciccotti, Pietro Greco

The frontiers collection•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations

The Transition Point Between Classical and Quantum Mechanical Systems Deterministically Defined

Terence William Barrett

From a deterministic point of view of quantum theory the Schrodinger equation, considered as an equation of motion, is defined within an area of instability formed by two potential minima.This view can be related to the renormalization group theory of critical phenomena, and the location of two nontrivial fixed points can be defined with respect to those two potential minima.The renormalization group theory parameter: d, the dimensionality of space, defines the transition between classical and quantum theory.For a system in which d 2 4, classical mechanics applies, and for d < 4, quantum mechanics applies.Whereas the classical potential defining an equation of motion has one potential minimum (at the Gaussian fixed point), the quantum potential defining an equation of motion has two potential minima (at the nontrivial fixed points).An analogy exists between systems based on wave mechanics and those based on lattice systems.The underlying dynamics of that potential, the minimization of which results in an equation formally equivalent to the Schrodinger equation, can, in this formal analogy, be identified with the underlying dynamics of the exchange energy at the vertex of a lattice.There is thus a mathematical global similarity underlying the behavior of these two distinct theoretical frameworks which describes both.The principal and angular momentum quantum numbers of electron systems in this analogy are equivalent to the dimensionality of space, d, and the dimensionality of spin space, n, in the general theory of critical phenomena.The general theory describes the phase transitions of electron (wave mechanical) systems, and also a "Mendeleev's table" based on the d and n parameters constructed for those electron systems, in analogy with such a table for lattice systems.

Physica Scripta•Apr 1, 1987•1 citation

Operator formulation of classical mechanics: Levi-Civita map and equivalence of central forces in two dimensions

Nikhil Kasyap Puranam, E. Harikumar

We study the operator formulation of classical mechanics by explicitly applying it to two central potentials in two dimensions. After constructing the classical Hamiltonian operators and corresponding Schrödinger-like equations, we solve for the corresponding classical wave functions associated with these two potentials, viz, Kepler and harmonic potentials. While satisfying continuity equations, these classical wave functions are shown to be renormalizable only in a finite region of the 2D plane. We also derive the well-known equivalence between these two models within the operator formulation of classical mechanics. This equivalence is shown by relating the Schrödinger-like equations and corresponding classical wave functions of these two systems, using the Levi-Civita map and a reparametrization of time (Sundman map).

arXiv:2412.08999•Modern Physics Letters A•Oct 13, 2025•0 citations

Quantum critical phenomena in spin systems

Subir Sachdev A

•Jan 1, 1997•0 citations
From a deterministic point of view of quantum theory the Schrodinger equation, considered as an equation of motion, is defined within an area of instability formed by two potential minima.This view can be related to the renormalization group theory of critical phenomena, and the location of two nontrivial fixed points can be defined with respect to those two potential minima.The renormalization group theory parameter: d, the dimensionality of space, defines the transition between classical and quantum theory.For a system in which d 2 4, classical mechanics applies, and for d < 4, quantum mechanics applies.Whereas the classical potential defining an equation of motion has one potential minimum (at the Gaussian fixed point), the quantum potential defining an equation of motion has two potential minima (at the nontrivial fixed points).An analogy exists between systems based on wave mechanics and those based on lattice systems.The underlying dynamics of that potential, the minimization of which results in an equation formally equivalent to the Schrodinger equation, can, in this formal analogy, be identified with the underlying dynamics of the exchange energy at the vertex of a lattice.There is thus a mathematical global similarity underlying the behavior of these two distinct theoretical frameworks which describes both.The principal and angular momentum quantum numbers of electron systems in this analogy are equivalent to the dimensionality of space, d, and the dimensionality of spin space, n, in the general theory of critical phenomena.The general theory describes the phase transitions of electron (wave mechanical) systems, and also a "Mendeleev's table" based on the d and n parameters constructed for those electron systems, in analogy with such a table for lattice systems.
We study the operator formulation of classical mechanics by explicitly applying it to two central potentials in two dimensions. After constructing the classical Hamiltonian operators and corresponding Schrödinger-like equations, we solve for the corresponding classical wave functions associated with these two potentials, viz, Kepler and harmonic potentials. While satisfying continuity equations, these classical wave functions are shown to be renormalizable only in a finite region of the 2D plane. We also derive the well-known equivalence between these two models within the operator formulation of classical mechanics. This equivalence is shown by relating the Schrödinger-like equations and corresponding classical wave functions of these two systems, using the Levi-Civita map and a reparametrization of time (Sundman map).