Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

Towards a test of non-locality without “supplementary assumptions”

Marco Barbieri, F. De Martini, G. Di Nepi, Paolo Mataloni

Published Nov 16, 2004• 19 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.physleta.2004.10.076

Related papers

Bell's theorem, quantum mechanical non-locality and atomic cascade photons

M. Ardehali

Bell's theorem of 1965 is a proof that all realistic interpretations of quantum mechanics must be non-local. Bell's theorem consists of two parts: first a correlation inequality is derived that must be satisfied by all local realistic theories; second it is demonstrated that quantum mechanical probabilities violate this inequality in certain cases. In the case of ideal experiments, Bell's theorem has been proven. However, in the case of real experiments where polarizers and detectors are non-ideal, the theorem has not yet been proven since the proof always requires some arbitrary and {\em ad hoc} supplementary assumptions. In this paper, we state a new and rather weak supplementary assumption for the ensemble of photons that emerge from the polarizers, and we show that the conjunction of Einstein's locality with this assumption leads to validity of an inequality that is violated by a factor as large as 1.5 in the case of real experiments. Moreover, the present supplementary assumption is considerably weaker and more general than Clauser, Horne, Shimony, Holt supplementary assumption.

arXiv:quant-ph/9810058•Oct 19, 1998•0 citations

Non-locality Reconsidered

Palgrave Macmillan eBooks•Nov 7, 2014•0 citations

THE PROBLEM OF NON-LOCALITY

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jun 1, 2000•0 citations

Nonlocality tests of Bell Inequalities and of Hardy's "ladder theorem" without "supplementary assumptions"

Marco Barbieri, F. De Martini, G. Di Nepi +1 more

We have experimentally tested the non local properties of the states generated by a high brilliance source of entanglement which virtually allows the direct measurement of the full set of photon pairs created by the basic QED process implied by the parametric quantum scattering. Standard Bell measurements and Bell's inequality violation test have been realized over the entire cone of emission of the degenerate pairs. By the same source we have verified the Hardy's ladder theory up to the 20th step and the contradiction between the standard quantum theory and the local realism has been tested for 41% of entangled pairs. PACS: 03.65.Ud, 03.67.Mn, 42.65.Lm

arXiv:quant-ph/0406156•Jun 22, 2004•0 citations

Debunking Non-Locality Causality

N. Glenn Gratke

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Apr 17, 2005•0 citations

Hardy’s approach, Eberhard’s inequality, and supplementary assumptions

Augusto Garuccio

Hardy's formulation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Roser paradox and the usual formulation based on Bell-type inequalities are compared. The role of the supplementary assumptions in an experimental test based on Hardy's approach is discussed. It is proved that even in Hardy's approach the supplementary assumptions play a fundamental role in refusing Einstein locality on the basis of the experimental results. The lowest value of quantum efficiency for a loophole-free experiment based on Hardy's approach is deduced.

Physical Review A•Oct 1, 1995•53 citations
Bell's theorem of 1965 is a proof that all realistic interpretations of quantum mechanics must be non-local. Bell's theorem consists of two parts: first a correlation inequality is derived that must be satisfied by all local realistic theories; second it is demonstrated that quantum mechanical probabilities violate this inequality in certain cases. In the case of ideal experiments, Bell's theorem has been proven. However, in the case of real experiments where polarizers and detectors are non-ideal, the theorem has not yet been proven since the proof always requires some arbitrary and {\em ad hoc} supplementary assumptions. In this paper, we state a new and rather weak supplementary assumption for the ensemble of photons that emerge from the polarizers, and we show that the conjunction of Einstein's locality with this assumption leads to validity of an inequality that is violated by a factor as large as 1.5 in the case of real experiments. Moreover, the present supplementary assumption is considerably weaker and more general than Clauser, Horne, Shimony, Holt supplementary assumption.
We have experimentally tested the non local properties of the states generated by a high brilliance source of entanglement which virtually allows the direct measurement of the full set of photon pairs created by the basic QED process implied by the parametric quantum scattering. Standard Bell measurements and Bell's inequality violation test have been realized over the entire cone of emission of the degenerate pairs. By the same source we have verified the Hardy's ladder theory up to the 20th step and the contradiction between the standard quantum theory and the local realism has been tested for 41% of entangled pairs. PACS: 03.65.Ud, 03.67.Mn, 42.65.Lm
Hardy's formulation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Roser paradox and the usual formulation based on Bell-type inequalities are compared. The role of the supplementary assumptions in an experimental test based on Hardy's approach is discussed. It is proved that even in Hardy's approach the supplementary assumptions play a fundamental role in refusing Einstein locality on the basis of the experimental results. The lowest value of quantum efficiency for a loophole-free experiment based on Hardy's approach is deduced.