Three examples of spatial Bose-Einstein condensations in which the particles macroscopically occupy the lowest localized state of an inhomogeneous external potential are analyzed. The three cases are (a) a small potential well in a large box which causes a spectrum with a gap, (b) a harmonic oscillator potential, and (c) randomly sized trapping potentials caused by ’’impurities.’’ All three cases are two dimensional so that no Bose condensation occurs without the inhomogeneous potentials. An attempt is made to keep the treatments as mathematically simple as possible. A review of much of the literature of spatial Bose condensations is provided. The special problem of the form of the thermodynamic limit in an inhomogeneous potential is discussed for case (b). Numerical examples applying to monolayer 4He adsorbed on a surface are treated.
Three examples of spatial Bose-Einstein condensations in which the particles macroscopically occupy the lowest localized state of an inhomogeneous external potential are analyzed. The three cases are (a) a small potential well in a large box which causes a spectrum with a gap, (b) a harmonic oscillator potential, and (c) randomly sized trapping potentials caused by ’’impurities.’’ All three cases are two dimensional so that no Bose condensation occurs without the inhomogeneous potentials. An attempt is made to keep the treatments as mathematically simple as possible. A review of much of the literature of spatial Bose condensations is provided. The special problem of the form of the thermodynamic limit in an inhomogeneous potential is discussed for case (b). Numerical examples applying to monolayer 4He adsorbed on a surface are treated.
Bose–Einstein condensation can be understood as a macroscopic occupation of a single-particle state. But an alternative definition, which requires only a macroscopic occupation of an arbitrarily small energy band of single-particle states, is also known, referred to as generalized Bose–Einstein condensation, and considered to be thermodynamically more stable. Depending on the number of macroscopically occupied single-particle states in the condensate, three types are then distin-guished. If the number of macroscopically occupied single-particle states is finite but at least one, then the condensation is said to be of type-I. A type-II condensate occurs if infinitely many single-particle states are macroscopically occupied. If a generalized Bose–Einstein condensation without any macroscopically occupied single-particle states is present, then one speaks of a type-III con-densation. In noninteracting Bose gases, it is generally easier to prove the occurrence of generalized Bose–Einstein condensation than to determine its type. While a main step for the former task is to show that the critical density is finite, quite detailed knowledge of the energy gaps of the cor-responding single-particle Hamiltonian at the lower edge of the spectrum is needed for the latter one. In this dissertation, we study the occurrence of a Bose–Einstein condensate in Bose gases that are placed in metrically transitive random potentials. We mainly consider the Poisson random potential. The thermodynamic limit and Dirichlet boundary conditions are used throughout this work. We explore noninteracting Bose gases in arbitrary dimension at positive temperatures and a one-dimensional interacting Bose gas at zero temperature. We provide fairly general sufficient conditions for the random potential that imply the almost sure occurrence of generalized Bose–Einstein condensation in noninteracting Bose gases. These conditions are fulfilled by a Poisson random potential, depending on its single-impurity potential. They are also met by the one-dimensional Luttinger–Sy model, which is a central system in the research area of Bose gases in random potentials, and a generalization thereof. Moreover, we state sufficient energy gap conditions such that one can conclude a type-I condensation in Poisson random potentials. We consider different probabilistic notions here, such as convergence in the rth mean, r P N, in probability, and with probability almost one. In particular, we prove that in the Luttinger–Sy model with infinitely strong random potential a type-I condensation occurs in the rth mean, r P N, if the particle density is greater than the critical one. For the Luttinger–Sy model with a finitely strong random potential, we show the same statement, but with probability almost one. Finally, we discuss the Luttinger–Sy model with a repulsive contact interaction between the particles at zero temperature. We provide sufficient requirements such that a generalized Bose–Einstein condensate almost surely occurs. We also show that the type of the condensate is altered by the interparticle interaction. In particular, we demonstrate a transition from a type-I to a type-III condensate when the strength of the contact interaction is increased. Furthermore, we prove that the interparticle interaction reduces the local particle density.
We examine the occurrence of Bose-Einstein condensation in both nonrelativistic and relativistic systems with no self-interactions in a general setting. A simple condition for the occurrence of Bose-Einstein condensation can be given if we adopt generalized ζ-functions to define the quantum theory. We show that the crucial feature governing Bose-Einstein condensation is the dimension q associated with the continuous part of the eigenvalue spectrum of the Hamiltonian for nonrelativistic systems or the spatial part of the Klein-Gordon operator for relativistic systems. In either case Bose-Einstein condensation can only occur if q ≥ 3 [1]. Several examples, some of them not completely solved before, may be treated very easily using our simple criterion [2]. These examples are charged free gases confined in finite volumes as torus, boxes, spheres, cylinders (see also [3, 4, 5, 6]) and in the presence of general constant external magnetic fields ([7, 8, 9, 10]).
Abstract The Bose-Einstein condensation of a gas is investigated. Starting from the well-known formulae for Bose statistics, the problem has been generalized to include a variety of potential fields in which the particles of the gas move, and the number w of dimensions has not been restricted to three. The energy levels are taken to be εi≡εs1,....,s10=constanth2ms1α−1a12+...+swαaw2(1≤α≤2) the quantum numbers being s1 ,w= 1, 2, ..., and a1, ..., aw being certain characteristic lengths. (For α = 2, the potential field is that of the w-dimensional rectangular box; for α = 1, we obtain the w-dimensional harmonic oscillator field.) A direct rigorous method is used similar to that proposed by Fowler & Jones (1938). It is shown that the number q = w/α determines the appearance of an Einstein transition temperature T0·For q≤ 1 there is no such point, while for q > 1 a transition point exists. For 1 < q≤ 2, the mean energy ϵ- per particle and the specific heat dϵ-/dT are continuous at T = T0· For q > 2, the specific heat is discontinuous at T = T0, giving rise to a A λ-point. A well-defined transition point only appears for a very large (theoretically infinite) number N of particles. T0 is finite only if the quantity v = N/(a1 .... aw)2/ α¯is finite. For a rectangular box, v is equal to the mean density of the gas. If v tends to zero or infinity as N→ ∞, then T0 likewise tends to zero or infinity. In the case q > 1, and at temperatures T < T 0' there is a finite fraction N0 /N of the particles, given by N 0/N = 1-(T/T0)q, in the lowest state. London’s formula (1938 b) for the three-dimensional box is an example of this equation. Some further results are also compared with those given by London’s continuous spectrum approximation.
The fact that two-dimensional interacting trapped systems do not undergo Bose-Einstein Condensation (BEC) in the thermodynamic limit, though rigorously proved, is somewhat mysterious because all relevant limiting cases (zero temperature, small atom numbers, noninteracting particles) suggest otherwise. We study the possibility of condensation in finite trapped two-dimensional systems. We first consider the ideal gas, which incorporates the inhomogeneity and finite size of experimental systems and can be solved exactly. A semiclassical self-consistent approximation gives us a feel for the temperature scales; diagonalization of the one-body density matrix confirms that the condensation is into a single state. We squeeze a three-dimensional system and see how it crosses over into two dimensions. Mean-field theory, our main tool for the study of interacting systems, prescribes coupled equations for the condensate and the thermal cloud: the condensate receives a full quantum-mechanical treatment, while the noncondensate is described by different schemes of varying sophistication. We analyze the T = 0 case and its approach to the thermodynamic limit, finding a criterion for the dimensionality crossover and obtaining the coupling constant of the two-dimensional system that results from squeezing a three-dimensional trap. We next apply a semiclassical Hartree-Fock approximation to purely two-dimensional finite gases and find that they can be described either with or without a condensate; this continues to be true in the thermodynamic limit. The condensed solutions have a lower free energy at all temperatures but neglect the presence of phonons within the system and cease to exist when we allow for this possibility. The uncondensed solutions, in turn, are valid under a more rigorous scheme but have consistency problems of their own. Path-integral Monte Carlo simulations provide an essentially exact description of finite interacting gases and enable us to study highly anisotropic systems at finite temperature. We find that our two-dimensional Hartree-Fock solutions accurately mimic the surface density profile and predict the condensate fraction of these systems; the equivalent interaction parameter is smaller than that dictated by the T = 0 analysis. We conclude that, in two-dimensional isotropic finite trapped systems and in highly compressed three-dimensional gases, there is a phenomenon resembling a condensation into a single state.
The review is devoted to the elucidation of the basic problems arising in the theoretical investigation of systems with Bose-Einstein condensate. Understanding these challenging problems is necessary for the correct description of Bose-condensed systems. The principal problems considered in the review are as follows: (i) What is the relation between Bose-Einstein condensation and global gauge symmetry breaking? (ii) How to resolve the Hohenberg-Martin dilemma of conserving versus gapless theories? (iii) How to describe Bose-condensed systems in strong spatially random potentials? (iv) Whether thermodynamically anomalous fluctuations in Bose systems are admissible? (v) How to create nonground-state condensates? Detailed answers to these questions are given in the review. As examples of nonequilibrium condensates, three cases are described: coherent modes, turbulent superfluids, and heterophase fluids.
The Bogoliubov inequality and the nature of Bose-Einstein condensates for interacting atoms in spatial dimensions D≤2
We consider the restriction placed by the Bogoliubov inequality on the nature of the Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) for interacting atoms in a spatial dimension D - 2 and in the presence of an external arbitrary potential, which may be a confining "box", a periodic, or a disordered potential. The atom-atom interaction gives rise to a (gauge invariance) symmetry-breaking term that places further restrictions on BECs in the form of a consistency proviso. The necessary condition for the existence of a BEC in D - 2 in all cases is macroscopic occupation of many single-particle momenta states with the origin a limit point (or accumulation point) of condensates. It is shown that the nature of BECs for noninteracting atoms in a disordered potential is precisely the same as that of BECs for interacting atoms in the absence of an external potential.