Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical

Weak value distributions for spin 1/2

Michael Berry, Mark R. Dennis, B McRoberts, Pragya Shukla

Published Apr 19, 2011• 13 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The simplest weak measurement is of a component of spin 1/2. For this observable, the probability distributions of the real and imaginary parts of the weak value, and their joint probability distribution, are calculated exactly for pre- and postselected states uniformly distributed over the surface of the Poincaré-Bloch sphere. The superweak probability, that the real part of the weak value lies outside the spectral range, is 1/3. This case, with just two eigenvalues, complements our previous calculation ( Berry and Shukla 2010 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43 354024 ) of the universal form of the weak value probability distribution for an operator with many eigenvalues.

DOI
10.1088/1751-8113/44/20/205301

Related papers

Typical weak and superweak values

Michael Berry, Pragya Shukla

Weak values, resulting from the action of an operator on a preselected state when measured after postselection by a different state, can lie outside the spectrum of eigenvalues of the operator: they can be ‘superweak’. This phenomenon can be quantified by averaging over an ensemble of the two states, and calculating the probability distribution of the weak values. If there are many eigenvalues, distributed within a finite range, this distribution takes a simple universal generalized lorentzian form, and the ‘superweak probablility’, of weak values outside the spectrum, can be as large as 1–1/ = 0.293.... By contrast, the familiar expectation values always lie within the spectral range, and their distribution, although approximately gaussian for many eigenvalues, is not universal.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Aug 12, 2010•37 citations

Weak Ratios

Yakov Bloch

Abstract Weak values characterize a quantum system in the period of time between preparation and measurement and may lie outside the eigenvalue spectrum of the measured operator. The probability of such “superweak" values for random quantum states has been calculated and applied to Klein–Gordon and Dirac waves, where the maximal probability for superluminal propagation was shown to be 1/2. In a recent paper, a different definition for the velocity of a relativistic quantum particle was proposed in terms of a ratio of two weak values. In this paper, we find the probability distribution of such ratios. With the new definition, the superluminal probability of photons is found to be bounded between $$1-1/\sqrt{2}$$ and $$1/\sqrt{2}$$ , while for general eigenvalue distributions the superluminal probability can take any value between 0 and 1.

Foundations of Physics•Jul 9, 2025•1 citation

Weak Measurements: Typical Weak and Superweak Values

Pragya Shukla

Weak value is a physical property of a quantum system which manifests itself through a weak measurement using different preand post-selected ensembles of the system. The weak values of an operator may differ significantly from its eigenvalues and can even lie outside the spectrum if it is bound: they can be ‘superweak’. The latter, originating due to a coherent superposition of waves, may appear as a ‘supershift’ on the measuring device. This property has potential application in the amplification and detection of extremely weak signals.

Current Science•Dec 1, 2015•0 citations

Weak measurement: Effect of the detector dynamics

Antonio Di Lorenzo, J. Carlos Egues

The contribution of the detector dynamics to the weak measurement is analyzed. According to the usual theory [Y. Aharonov, D. Z. Albert, and L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1351 (1988)] the outcome of a weak measurement with preselection and postselection can be expressed as the real part of a complex number: the weak value. By accounting for the Hamiltonian evolution of the detector, here we find that there is a contribution proportional to the imaginary part of the weak value to the outcome of the weak measurement. This is due to the coherence of the probe being essential for the concept of complex weak value to be meaningful. As a particular example, we consider the measurement of a spin component and find that the contribution of the imaginary part of the weak value is sizable.

arXiv:0801.1814•Physical Review A•Apr 16, 2008•51 citations

Determination of weak values of quantum operators using only strong measurements

Eliahu Cohen, Eli Pollak

Weak values have been shown to be helpful especially when considering them as the outcomes of weak measurements. In this paper we show that, in principle, the real and imaginary parts of the weak value of any operator may be elucidated from expectation values of suitably defined density, flux, and Hermitian commutator operators. Expectation values are the outcomes of strong (projective) measurements, implying that weak values are general properties of operators in association with pre- and postselection and they need not be preferentially associated with weak measurements. They should be considered as an important measurable property which provides added information compared with the ``standard'' diagonal expectation value of an operator. As the first specific example we consider the determination of the real and imaginary parts of the weak value of the momentum operator employing projective time-of-flight experiments. Then the results are analyzed from the point of view of Bohmian mechanics. Finally, we consider recent neutron interferometry experiments used to determine the weak values of the neutron spin.

arXiv:1804.11298•Physical Review A•Oct 9, 2018•46 citations

Significance of the imaginary part of the weak value

Justin Dressel, Andrew N. Jordan

Unlike the real part of the generalized weak value of an observable, which can in a restricted sense be operationally interpreted as an idealized conditioned average of that observable in the limit of zero measurement disturbance, the imaginary part of the generalized weak value does not provide information pertaining to the observable being measured. What it does provide is direct information about how the initial state would be unitarily disturbed by the observable operator. Specifically, we provide an operational interpretation for the imaginary part of the generalized weak value as the logarithmic directional derivative of the postselection probability along the unitary flow generated by the action of the observable operator. To obtain this interpretation, we revisit the standard von Neumann measurement protocol for obtaining the real and imaginary parts of the weak value and solve it exactly for arbitrary initial states and postselections using the quantum operations formalism, which allows us to understand in detail how each part of the generalized weak value arises in the linear response regime. We also provide exact treatments of qubit measurements and Gaussian detectors as illustrative special cases, and show that the measurement disturbance from a Gaussian detector is purely decohering in the Lindblad sense, which allows the shifts for a Gaussian detector to be completely understood for any coupling strength in terms of a single complex weak value that involves the decohered initial state.

arXiv:1112.3986•Physical Review A•Jan 23, 2012•134 citations
The simplest weak measurement is of a component of spin 1/2. For this observable, the probability distributions of the real and imaginary parts of the weak value, and their joint probability distribution, are calculated exactly for pre- and postselected states uniformly distributed over the surface of the Poincaré-Bloch sphere. The superweak probability, that the real part of the weak value lies outside the spectral range, is 1/3. This case, with just two eigenvalues, complements our previous calculation ( Berry and Shukla 2010 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43 354024 ) of the universal form of the weak value probability distribution for an operator with many eigenvalues.
Weak values, resulting from the action of an operator on a preselected state when measured after postselection by a different state, can lie outside the spectrum of eigenvalues of the operator: they can be ‘superweak’. This phenomenon can be quantified by averaging over an ensemble of the two states, and calculating the probability distribution of the weak values. If there are many eigenvalues, distributed within a finite range, this distribution takes a simple universal generalized lorentzian form, and the ‘superweak probablility’, of weak values outside the spectrum, can be as large as 1–1/ = 0.293.... By contrast, the familiar expectation values always lie within the spectral range, and their distribution, although approximately gaussian for many eigenvalues, is not universal.
Abstract Weak values characterize a quantum system in the period of time between preparation and measurement and may lie outside the eigenvalue spectrum of the measured operator. The probability of such “superweak" values for random quantum states has been calculated and applied to Klein–Gordon and Dirac waves, where the maximal probability for superluminal propagation was shown to be 1/2. In a recent paper, a different definition for the velocity of a relativistic quantum particle was proposed in terms of a ratio of two weak values. In this paper, we find the probability distribution of such ratios. With the new definition, the superluminal probability of photons is found to be bounded between 1−1/21-1/\sqrt{2}1−1/2​ and 1/21/\sqrt{2}1/2​ , while for general eigenvalue distributions the superluminal probability can take any value between 0 and 1.
Weak value is a physical property of a quantum system which manifests itself through a weak measurement using different preand post-selected ensembles of the system. The weak values of an operator may differ significantly from its eigenvalues and can even lie outside the spectrum if it is bound: they can be ‘superweak’. The latter, originating due to a coherent superposition of waves, may appear as a ‘supershift’ on the measuring device. This property has potential application in the amplification and detection of extremely weak signals.
The contribution of the detector dynamics to the weak measurement is analyzed. According to the usual theory [Y. Aharonov, D. Z. Albert, and L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1351 (1988)] the outcome of a weak measurement with preselection and postselection can be expressed as the real part of a complex number: the weak value. By accounting for the Hamiltonian evolution of the detector, here we find that there is a contribution proportional to the imaginary part of the weak value to the outcome of the weak measurement. This is due to the coherence of the probe being essential for the concept of complex weak value to be meaningful. As a particular example, we consider the measurement of a spin component and find that the contribution of the imaginary part of the weak value is sizable.
Weak values have been shown to be helpful especially when considering them as the outcomes of weak measurements. In this paper we show that, in principle, the real and imaginary parts of the weak value of any operator may be elucidated from expectation values of suitably defined density, flux, and Hermitian commutator operators. Expectation values are the outcomes of strong (projective) measurements, implying that weak values are general properties of operators in association with pre- and postselection and they need not be preferentially associated with weak measurements. They should be considered as an important measurable property which provides added information compared with the ``standard'' diagonal expectation value of an operator. As the first specific example we consider the determination of the real and imaginary parts of the weak value of the momentum operator employing projective time-of-flight experiments. Then the results are analyzed from the point of view of Bohmian mechanics. Finally, we consider recent neutron interferometry experiments used to determine the weak values of the neutron spin.
Unlike the real part of the generalized weak value of an observable, which can in a restricted sense be operationally interpreted as an idealized conditioned average of that observable in the limit of zero measurement disturbance, the imaginary part of the generalized weak value does not provide information pertaining to the observable being measured. What it does provide is direct information about how the initial state would be unitarily disturbed by the observable operator. Specifically, we provide an operational interpretation for the imaginary part of the generalized weak value as the logarithmic directional derivative of the postselection probability along the unitary flow generated by the action of the observable operator. To obtain this interpretation, we revisit the standard von Neumann measurement protocol for obtaining the real and imaginary parts of the weak value and solve it exactly for arbitrary initial states and postselections using the quantum operations formalism, which allows us to understand in detail how each part of the generalized weak value arises in the linear response regime. We also provide exact treatments of qubit measurements and Gaussian detectors as illustrative special cases, and show that the measurement disturbance from a Gaussian detector is purely decohering in the Lindblad sense, which allows the shifts for a Gaussian detector to be completely understood for any coupling strength in terms of a single complex weak value that involves the decohered initial state.