Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Mathematical Physics

General Structure of the Distribution Functions for the Heisenberg Model and the Ising Model

Tohru Morita

Published Jan 1, 1972• 122 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The general structure for the distribution functions (reduced density matrices) for systems composed of a number of elements is given by taking the variation with respect to the distribution functions in the formalism of the cluster variation method. The parameters or the Lagrange multipliers occurring in the distribution functions must be determined by the reducibility condition of the distribution functions or by the stationariness condition of the free energy.

DOI
10.1063/1.1665840

Related papers

Cluster Variation Method for Non-Uniform Ising and Heisenberg Models and Spin-Pair Correlation Function

Tohru Morita

A general discussion on applying the cluster variation method to non-uniform Ising and Heisenberg models is given. In particular, a general formula is provided for obtaining the linear response to increases of the external fields and the parameters of interactions for the uniform Ising and Heisenberg models in the cluster variation method. As an illustration, it is shown that the expressions of the spin-pair correlation function in the pair and the square approximation are readily derived by the formula, for the Ising models on the square and simple cubic lattices.

Progress of Theoretical Physics•Feb 1, 1991•27 citations

Elementary properties of an energy functional of the first-order reduced density matrix

Robert A. Donnelly, Robert G. Parr

The Hohenberg–Kohn theorem implies the existence of an energy functional based solely on the first-order reduced density matrix of the ground state of an atomic or molecular system. Application of the variational principle for the functional EvM[γ] generates a set of coupled Euler equations for the representation coefficients and spin orbitals of a rank-M approximation to the exact ground-state density matrix. Defining the (assumed Hermitian) kernel FM[γ;x′,x]≡δEvM/δγ (x,x′), the equations in an arbitrary representation for the approximate density matrix, γ (x,x′) =ΣijMψ1(x) γijψj* (x′) are the following: ℱdξFM[γ;x′,ξ]ψi(ξ) =μψi(x′); i=1, 2,...,M; ℱdξFM[γ;x′,ξ] ΣMiψi(ξ) γ ij=ΣMiψi(x′) λij; j=1, 2, ...,M. The quantity μ is the chemical potential of the system of interest and the λij are a set of M2 Lagrange multipliers constraining the orthonormality of the spin orbital basis {ψ}. The coefficients γij must be chosen such that FM has the degenerate eigenvalue spectrum, FiiM=μ, i=1, 2,...,M, for all partially occupied orbitals. The spin orbitals, for a fixed set of coefficients, must be simultaneously determined so that λ is Hermitian. Provided all occupation numbers lie on the open interval (0,1), the stationary density matrix itself obeys the eigenvalue equation ℱdξFM[γ;x,ξ]γ (ξ,x′) =μγ (x,x′), and for any stationary density matrix the following commutation rules are valid: [FM[γ], γ]=0; [λ, γ]=0. The matrices γ and λ consequently can be brought simultaneously to diagonal form, and the canonical representation of the energy functional provides an eigenvalue equation determining the natural spin orbitals. The value of the chemical potential is μ=εi/ni, i=1, 2, ...,M; ε=diag (λ); from which follows the distribution function governing the occupation numbers of a stationary density matrix. Two limiting forms of the variational principle are examined, the exact and Hartree–Fock functionals, and related previous work by Gilbert is discussed. The physical content of the equations is illuminated by identification of the chemical potential as the negative of the electronegativity; Sanderson’s Principle of Electronegativity Equalization follows.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Nov 15, 1978•285 citations

Variational principles for particles and fields in Heisenberg matrix mechanics

Abraham Klein, Ching‐Teh Li, Moyez G. Vassanji

For many years we have advocated a form of quantum mechanics based on the application of sum rule methods (completeness) to the equations of motion and to the commutation relations, i.e., to Heisenberg matrix mechanics. Sporadically we have discussed or alluded to a variational foundation for this method. In this paper we present a series of variational principles applicable to a range of systems from one-dimensional quantum mechanics to quantum fields. The common thread is that the stationary quantity is the trace of the Hamiltonian over Hilbert space (or over a subspace of interest in an approximation) expressed as a functional of matrix elements of the elementary operators of the theory. These parameters are constrained by the kinematical relations of the theory introduced by the method of Lagrange multipliers. For the field theories, variational principles in which matrix elements of the density operators are chosen as fundamental are also developed. A qualitative discussion of applications is presented.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Oct 1, 1980•13 citations

Application of the Cluster Variation Method to the Heisenberg Model with Arbitrary Spin and Range of Exchange

Tohru Morita, Tomoyasu Tanaka

The cluster variation method for the cooperative phenomena proposed by Kikuchi and reformulated and generalized by Morita, is applied to the Heisenberg model with arbitrary spin and range of exchange. A general expression for the two-body reduced density matrix is obtained in the approximation in which the clusters of pairs of lattice sites are retained correctly. The constant-coupling approximation for the Heisenberg model of $S\ensuremath{\geqq}1$ is shown to be derived by satisfying the reducibility conditions ${{\mathrm{tr}}_{k\ensuremath{\rho}}}^{(2)}(j, k)={\ensuremath{\rho}}^{(1)}(j)$ only partly, requiring the consistency for the zeroth and first moments of ${S}_{\mathrm{jz}}$ and ignoring the consistency for the second to $2S\mathrm{th}$ moments. A natural method of extending the constant-coupling approximation for the Heisenberg model to the cases with arbitrary spin and range of exchange is suggested.

Physical Review•May 6, 1966•65 citations

Structure of the Density Matrices in the Cluster Variation Method

Tomoyasu Tanaka, Kouzi Hirose, Kenpou Kurati

Two of the formulations of the cluster variation method are compared. The Heisenberg model of ferromagnetism in four-spin approximation is used as a working example. The numerical results obtained are used in the CAM analysis and an improved critical temperature is found. Formulations of the cluster variation method in the momentum space are also reviewed briefly.

Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement•Jan 1, 1994•8 citations

Renormalization of the reduced density matrices for inhomogeneous quantum fluids. II

L. E. Reichl

The second of two papers in which a systematic scheme for renormalizing the reduced density matrices of an initially inhomogeneous quantum fluid is introduced. In this paper, self-energy structures appearing among the initial conditions and Liouville vertices are resumed, and an expression for the reduced density matrices is obtained in which all distribution functions and all propagators are renormalized to include frequency dependent self-energy effects.

Bulletin de la Classe des sciences•Jan 1, 1973•0 citations
The general structure for the distribution functions (reduced density matrices) for systems composed of a number of elements is given by taking the variation with respect to the distribution functions in the formalism of the cluster variation method. The parameters or the Lagrange multipliers occurring in the distribution functions must be determined by the reducibility condition of the distribution functions or by the stationariness condition of the free energy.
A general discussion on applying the cluster variation method to non-uniform Ising and Heisenberg models is given. In particular, a general formula is provided for obtaining the linear response to increases of the external fields and the parameters of interactions for the uniform Ising and Heisenberg models in the cluster variation method. As an illustration, it is shown that the expressions of the spin-pair correlation function in the pair and the square approximation are readily derived by the formula, for the Ising models on the square and simple cubic lattices.
The Hohenberg–Kohn theorem implies the existence of an energy functional based solely on the first-order reduced density matrix of the ground state of an atomic or molecular system. Application of the variational principle for the functional EvM[γ] generates a set of coupled Euler equations for the representation coefficients and spin orbitals of a rank-M approximation to the exact ground-state density matrix. Defining the (assumed Hermitian) kernel FM[γ;x′,x]≡δEvM/δγ (x,x′), the equations in an arbitrary representation for the approximate density matrix, γ (x,x′) =ΣijMψ1(x) γijψj* (x′) are the following: ℱdξFM[γ;x′,ξ]ψi(ξ) =μψi(x′); i=1, 2,...,M; ℱdξFM[γ;x′,ξ] ΣMiψi(ξ) γ ij=ΣMiψi(x′) λij; j=1, 2, ...,M. The quantity μ is the chemical potential of the system of interest and the λij are a set of M2 Lagrange multipliers constraining the orthonormality of the spin orbital basis {ψ}. The coefficients γij must be chosen such that FM has the degenerate eigenvalue spectrum, FiiM=μ, i=1, 2,...,M, for all partially occupied orbitals. The spin orbitals, for a fixed set of coefficients, must be simultaneously determined so that λ is Hermitian. Provided all occupation numbers lie on the open interval (0,1), the stationary density matrix itself obeys the eigenvalue equation ℱdξFM[γ;x,ξ]γ (ξ,x′) =μγ (x,x′), and for any stationary density matrix the following commutation rules are valid: [FM[γ], γ]=0; [λ, γ]=0. The matrices γ and λ consequently can be brought simultaneously to diagonal form, and the canonical representation of the energy functional provides an eigenvalue equation determining the natural spin orbitals. The value of the chemical potential is μ=εi/ni, i=1, 2, ...,M; ε=diag (λ); from which follows the distribution function governing the occupation numbers of a stationary density matrix. Two limiting forms of the variational principle are examined, the exact and Hartree–Fock functionals, and related previous work by Gilbert is discussed. The physical content of the equations is illuminated by identification of the chemical potential as the negative of the electronegativity; Sanderson’s Principle of Electronegativity Equalization follows.
For many years we have advocated a form of quantum mechanics based on the application of sum rule methods (completeness) to the equations of motion and to the commutation relations, i.e., to Heisenberg matrix mechanics. Sporadically we have discussed or alluded to a variational foundation for this method. In this paper we present a series of variational principles applicable to a range of systems from one-dimensional quantum mechanics to quantum fields. The common thread is that the stationary quantity is the trace of the Hamiltonian over Hilbert space (or over a subspace of interest in an approximation) expressed as a functional of matrix elements of the elementary operators of the theory. These parameters are constrained by the kinematical relations of the theory introduced by the method of Lagrange multipliers. For the field theories, variational principles in which matrix elements of the density operators are chosen as fundamental are also developed. A qualitative discussion of applications is presented.
The cluster variation method for the cooperative phenomena proposed by Kikuchi and reformulated and generalized by Morita, is applied to the Heisenberg model with arbitrary spin and range of exchange. A general expression for the two-body reduced density matrix is obtained in the approximation in which the clusters of pairs of lattice sites are retained correctly. The constant-coupling approximation for the Heisenberg model of $S\ensuremath{\geqq}1$ is shown to be derived by satisfying the reducibility conditions ${{\mathrm{tr}}_{k\ensuremath{\rho}}}^{(2)}(j, k)={\ensuremath{\rho}}^{(1)}(j)$ only partly, requiring the consistency for the zeroth and first moments of Sjz{S}_{\mathrm{jz}}Sjz​ and ignoring the consistency for the second to 2Sth2S\mathrm{th}2Sth moments. A natural method of extending the constant-coupling approximation for the Heisenberg model to the cases with arbitrary spin and range of exchange is suggested.