Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Information Processing Letters

Quantum lower bounds for the Goldreich–Levin problem

Mark Adcock, Richard Cleve, Kazuo Iwama, Raymond Putra, Shigeru Yamashita

Published Jan 7, 2006• 5 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.ipl.2005.01.016

Related papers

A Quantum Goldreich-Levin Theorem with Cryptographic Applications

Mark Adcock, Richard Cleve

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2002•89 citations

Quantum lower bounds for the Goldreich-Levin problem

AdcockMark, CleveRichard, IwamaKazuo +2 more

At the heart of the Goldreich-Levin theorem is the problem of determining an n-bit string a by making queries to two oracles, referred to as IP (inner product) and EQ (equivalence). The IP oracle, ...

Information Processing Letters•Mar 16, 2006•0 citations

Quantum lower bounds by entropy numbers

Stefan Heinrich

arXiv:quant-ph/0611294•Journal of Complexity•Mar 14, 2007•9 citations

The classical and quantum complexity of the Goldreich-Levin problem with applications to bit commitment

Mark Adcock

The classical Goldreich-Levin (G-L) theorem is presented as a block-box query prob­lem, referred to herein as the G-L problem. The query complexity of this problem is bounded in both classical and quantum settings. The well-known upper bound of the classical G-L problem is analyzed in a pedagogical manner. A proof of the lower bound of the classical G-L problem is given using the techniques of classical information theory. This classical analysis is then extended to the realm of quantum computin g by noting the similarity of the noiseless G-L problem to the inner-product query problem solved by the quantum circuit defined by Bernstein and Vazirani (B-V) . An upper bound of the query complexity of the quantum G-L problem is proven by extension of the B-V circuit to incorporate noisy inner-product queries. The lower bound of the query complexity of the quantum G-L problem is proven by adapting the proof of the optimaliy of the quantum search algorithm to include modified inner-product queries. Both the classical and quantum versions of the Goldreich-Levi n theorem have cryptographic applications in the area of bit commitment. A discussion of the im­possibility of unconditional quantum bit commitment is followed by the presentation of both classical and quantum bit commitment protocols that are based on the as­sumption of the existence of classical and quantum one-way permutations. The relative security of the classical and quant m protocols are compared where it is shown that the quantum version is quantitatively more secure.

•Jan 1, 2004•1 citation

A near-optimal quadratic Goldreich-Levin algorithm (extended abstract)

Jop Briët, Davi Castro-Silva

We present a quadratic Goldreich–Levin algorithm that is nearly optimal in the following ways. Given a bounded function \(f : \mathbb{F}_2^n \to \mathbb{R}\) and any \(\varepsilon \gt 0\), the algorithm outputs a quadratic polynomial \(q : \mathbb{F}_2^n \to \mathbb{F}_2\) whose correlation with \((-1)^q\) is within an additive \(\varepsilon\) of the maximum achievable correlation with any quadratic phase function. It runs in \(O_\varepsilon(n^3)\) time and makes \(O_\varepsilon(n^2 \log n)\) queries to \(f\), matching the information-theoretic lower bound up to a logarithmic factor. The design of our algorithm draws on ideas from recent advances in quantum learning theory and departs from previous approaches based on algorithmic proofs of the inverse theorem for the Gowers uniformity norms.

Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks•Jan 1, 2026•1 citation

Quantum Lower Bounds by Quantum Arguments

Andris Ambainis

Journal of Computer and System Sciences•Jun 1, 2002•339 citations
The classical Goldreich-Levin (G-L) theorem is presented as a block-box query prob­lem, referred to herein as the G-L problem. The query complexity of this problem is bounded in both classical and quantum settings. The well-known upper bound of the classical G-L problem is analyzed in a pedagogical manner. A proof of the lower bound of the classical G-L problem is given using the techniques of classical information theory. This classical analysis is then extended to the realm of quantum computin g by noting the similarity of the noiseless G-L problem to the inner-product query problem solved by the quantum circuit defined by Bernstein and Vazirani (B-V) . An upper bound of the query complexity of the quantum G-L problem is proven by extension of the B-V circuit to incorporate noisy inner-product queries. The lower bound of the query complexity of the quantum G-L problem is proven by adapting the proof of the optimaliy of the quantum search algorithm to include modified inner-product queries. Both the classical and quantum versions of the Goldreich-Levi n theorem have cryptographic applications in the area of bit commitment. A discussion of the im­possibility of unconditional quantum bit commitment is followed by the presentation of both classical and quantum bit commitment protocols that are based on the as­sumption of the existence of classical and quantum one-way permutations. The relative security of the classical and quant m protocols are compared where it is shown that the quantum version is quantitatively more secure.
We present a quadratic Goldreich–Levin algorithm that is nearly optimal in the following ways. Given a bounded function f:F2n→Rf : \mathbb{F}_2^n \to \mathbb{R}f:F2n​→R and any ε>0\varepsilon \gt 0ε>0, the algorithm outputs a quadratic polynomial q:F2n→F2q : \mathbb{F}_2^n \to \mathbb{F}_2q:F2n​→F2​ whose correlation with (−1)q(-1)^q(−1)q is within an additive ε\varepsilonε of the maximum achievable correlation with any quadratic phase function. It runs in Oε(n3)O_\varepsilon(n^3)Oε​(n3) time and makes Oε(n2log⁡n)O_\varepsilon(n^2 \log n)Oε​(n2logn) queries to fff, matching the information-theoretic lower bound up to a logarithmic factor. The design of our algorithm draws on ideas from recent advances in quantum learning theory and departs from previous approaches based on algorithmic proofs of the inverse theorem for the Gowers uniformity norms.