Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical

Pointed weak energy and quantum geometric phase

Allen Parks

Published Feb 14, 2007• 5 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The pointed weak energy for an arbitrarily evolving quantum state defines a complex valued phase which is the sum of a dynamic phase and a purely geometric phase—the pointed geometric phase. The pointed geometric phase is concisely expressed as a time integral which depends upon the energy uncertainty, the associated evolving state, and its orthogonal companion state. The real part of the pointed geometric phase is to within a sign the geometric phase for arbitrary evolutions defined by Mukunda and Simon and that of Aharonov and Anandan for cyclic evolutions. The imaginary part of the pointed geometric phase governs the survival probability of the initial state. Several general rate of change relationships associated with the real and imaginary parts of the pointed geometric phase are deduced from this concise expression, and it is used to calculate the pointed geometric phase acquired as a spin- particle precesses under the influence of a uniform magnetic field.

DOI
10.1088/1751-8113/40/9/018

Related papers

Pointed weak energy and quantum state evolution in Pancharatnam–Fubini-Study configuration space

Allen Parks

The weak energy for a quantum state evolving relative to its fixed initial state (pointed weak energy) in a Hilbert space of arbitrary dimension is defined and aspects of the classical mechanical, transformational and geometric relationships between this quantity and the motion of the associated quantum state are studied in a two-dimensional configuration space with Pancharatnam (P) phase and Fubini-Study (FS) metric distance as generalized coordinates (PFS configuration space). It is shown that when expressed in these coordinates: (1) the evolution of the quantum state is described by an equation of motion for an associated correlation amplitude (pointed correlation amplitude) in which the dynamics are induced by the interaction of the pointed weak energy with this correlation amplitude; (2) the pointed weak energy defines a 1-form with the transformational properties of a U (1) gauge potential (pointed weak energy gauge potential) which produces infinitesimal changes in the pointed correlation amplitude via its interaction with the amplitude; (3) the pointed correlation amplitude is defined by an exponential function of a line integral of the pointed weak energy gauge potential; (4) pointed weak energy gauge transformations exist that are equivalent to local U (1) gauge transformations of quantum states and—when examined within the context of the pointed probability current and pointed weak energy stationary action principles—offer an interpretation of gauge invariance analogous to that found in classical mechanics; and (5) integral invariants exist which relate line integrals of the weak energy gauge potential to geometric phase and the Aharonov–Anandan connection 1-form in the associated Hilbert space. States which irreversibly decay and Grover's quantum search algorithm serve as simple illustrations of the theory.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Dec 21, 2005•7 citations

The geometry and significance of weak energy

Allen Parks

The theory of weak values for quantum mechanical observables has come to serve as a useful basis for contemporary discussions concerning such varied topics as the tunnelling-time controversy and quantum stochastic processes. An intrinsic complex-valued weak energy has recently been observed experimentally and reported in the literature. In this paper it is shown that: (a) the real and imaginary valued parts of this weak energy have geometric interpretations related to a phase acquired from parallel transport in Hilbert space and the variational dynamics occurring in the associated projective Hilbert space, respectively; (b) the weak energy defines functions which translate correlation amplitudes and probabilities in time; (c) correlation probabilities can be controlled by manipulating the weak energy and there exists a condition of weak stationarity that guarantees their time invariance; and (d) a time-weak energy uncertainty relation of the usual form prevails when a suitable set of dynamical constraints are imposed.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Mar 23, 2000•12 citations

Time-dependent weak values and their intrinsic phases of evolution

Allen Parks

The equation of motion for a time-dependent weak value of a quantum-mechanical observable is known to contain a complex valued energy factor (the weak energy of evolution) that is defined by the dynamics of the pre-selected and post-selected states which specify the observable's weak value. In this paper, the mechanism responsible for the creation of this energy is identified and it is shown that the cumulative effect over time of this energy is manifested as dynamical phases and pure geometric phases (the intrinsic phases of evolution) which govern the evolution of the weak value during its measurement process. These phases are simply related to a Pancharatnam phase and Fubini–Study metric distance defined by the Hilbert space evolution of the associated pre-selected and post-selected states. A characterization of time-dependent weak value evolution as Pancharatnam phase angle rotations and Fubini–Study distance scalings of a vector in the Argand plane is discussed as an application of this relationship. The theory of weak values is also reviewed and simple ‘gedanken experiments’ are used to illustrate both the time-independent and the time-dependent versions of the theory. It is noted that the direct experimental observation of the weak energy of evolution would strongly support the time-symmetric paradigm of quantum mechanics and it is suggested that weak value equations of motion represent a new category of nonlocal equations of motion.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Jul 17, 2008•11 citations

Geometric quantum phase and angles

J. Anandan, Yakir Aharonov

The geometric phase in quantum mechanics is formulated for charged particles in a gauge-invariant, geometric manner. It is then extended to an evolution resulting from a sequence of measurements as in the work of Pancharatnam and Aharonov and Vardi. Its close connection to the Feynman formulation of quantum mechanics is pointed out. The geometric angles, which are generalizations of the classical, adiabatic angles introduced by Hannay and the quantum, adiabatic angles introduced by Anandan and Stodolsky in their group-theoretic treatment of Berry's phase, are studied in quantum and classical physics. The geometric phase for a quantum spin in a magnetic field due to a second particle is obtained using the quantum reference frame defined by the latter. The question of whether the geometric phase and angles are local or nonlocal and their relationship to the electromagnetic and gravitational phases are also discussed.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Sep 15, 1988•156 citations

Comprehensive Review of Gauge and Reparameterization Invariant Geometric Phase for Open Quantum Systems Under the Most General Conditions

Abhirup Chatterjee, Sobhan Kumar Sounda

The concept of Geometric Phase in Quantum Mechanics is generally formulated en- tirely in terms of geometric structure of complex Hilbert Space. This tutorial article gives a general mathematical overview of the Geometric phase introduced by Berry with the conditions over the system’s evolution embedded through adiabaticity and cyclicity, which were subsequently relaxed sequentially by Aharonov-Anandan, Samuel-Bhandari, and later by Mukunda and Simon by using the idea of Bargmann Invariants. The arti- cle presents a thorough and illustrative overview regarding the mathematical derivation behind the upliftment of the conditions, which results in the generalized definition of the Geometric phase for quantum systems. In addition to that, the article also gives an overall idea about the general analytical aspects of finding the Geometric phase for three level open quantum systems undergoing decoherence and dephasing due to interaction with the surroundings in the weak system reservoir coupling limit described by quantum master equations.

•Nov 17, 2025•0 citations

Tight lower bounds on the time it takes to generate a geometric phase

Niklas Hörnedal, Ole Sönnerborn

Abstract Geometric phase is a concept of central importance in virtually every branch of physics. In this paper, we show that the evolution time of a cyclically evolving quantum system is restricted by the system’s energy resources and the geometric phase acquired by the state. Specifically, we derive and examine three tight lower bounds on the time required to generate any prescribed Aharonov-Anandan geometric phase. The derivations are based on recent results on the geometric character of the Mandelstam-Tamm and Margolus-Levitin quantum speed limits.

arXiv:2305.12156•Physica Scripta•Sep 11, 2023•5 citations
The pointed weak energy for an arbitrarily evolving quantum state defines a complex valued phase which is the sum of a dynamic phase and a purely geometric phase—the pointed geometric phase. The pointed geometric phase is concisely expressed as a time integral which depends upon the energy uncertainty, the associated evolving state, and its orthogonal companion state. The real part of the pointed geometric phase is to within a sign the geometric phase for arbitrary evolutions defined by Mukunda and Simon and that of Aharonov and Anandan for cyclic evolutions. The imaginary part of the pointed geometric phase governs the survival probability of the initial state. Several general rate of change relationships associated with the real and imaginary parts of the pointed geometric phase are deduced from this concise expression, and it is used to calculate the pointed geometric phase acquired as a spin- particle precesses under the influence of a uniform magnetic field.
The weak energy for a quantum state evolving relative to its fixed initial state (pointed weak energy) in a Hilbert space of arbitrary dimension is defined and aspects of the classical mechanical, transformational and geometric relationships between this quantity and the motion of the associated quantum state are studied in a two-dimensional configuration space with Pancharatnam (P) phase and Fubini-Study (FS) metric distance as generalized coordinates (PFS configuration space). It is shown that when expressed in these coordinates: (1) the evolution of the quantum state is described by an equation of motion for an associated correlation amplitude (pointed correlation amplitude) in which the dynamics are induced by the interaction of the pointed weak energy with this correlation amplitude; (2) the pointed weak energy defines a 1-form with the transformational properties of a U (1) gauge potential (pointed weak energy gauge potential) which produces infinitesimal changes in the pointed correlation amplitude via its interaction with the amplitude; (3) the pointed correlation amplitude is defined by an exponential function of a line integral of the pointed weak energy gauge potential; (4) pointed weak energy gauge transformations exist that are equivalent to local U (1) gauge transformations of quantum states and—when examined within the context of the pointed probability current and pointed weak energy stationary action principles—offer an interpretation of gauge invariance analogous to that found in classical mechanics; and (5) integral invariants exist which relate line integrals of the weak energy gauge potential to geometric phase and the Aharonov–Anandan connection 1-form in the associated Hilbert space. States which irreversibly decay and Grover's quantum search algorithm serve as simple illustrations of the theory.
The theory of weak values for quantum mechanical observables has come to serve as a useful basis for contemporary discussions concerning such varied topics as the tunnelling-time controversy and quantum stochastic processes. An intrinsic complex-valued weak energy has recently been observed experimentally and reported in the literature. In this paper it is shown that: (a) the real and imaginary valued parts of this weak energy have geometric interpretations related to a phase acquired from parallel transport in Hilbert space and the variational dynamics occurring in the associated projective Hilbert space, respectively; (b) the weak energy defines functions which translate correlation amplitudes and probabilities in time; (c) correlation probabilities can be controlled by manipulating the weak energy and there exists a condition of weak stationarity that guarantees their time invariance; and (d) a time-weak energy uncertainty relation of the usual form prevails when a suitable set of dynamical constraints are imposed.
The equation of motion for a time-dependent weak value of a quantum-mechanical observable is known to contain a complex valued energy factor (the weak energy of evolution) that is defined by the dynamics of the pre-selected and post-selected states which specify the observable's weak value. In this paper, the mechanism responsible for the creation of this energy is identified and it is shown that the cumulative effect over time of this energy is manifested as dynamical phases and pure geometric phases (the intrinsic phases of evolution) which govern the evolution of the weak value during its measurement process. These phases are simply related to a Pancharatnam phase and Fubini–Study metric distance defined by the Hilbert space evolution of the associated pre-selected and post-selected states. A characterization of time-dependent weak value evolution as Pancharatnam phase angle rotations and Fubini–Study distance scalings of a vector in the Argand plane is discussed as an application of this relationship. The theory of weak values is also reviewed and simple ‘gedanken experiments’ are used to illustrate both the time-independent and the time-dependent versions of the theory. It is noted that the direct experimental observation of the weak energy of evolution would strongly support the time-symmetric paradigm of quantum mechanics and it is suggested that weak value equations of motion represent a new category of nonlocal equations of motion.
The geometric phase in quantum mechanics is formulated for charged particles in a gauge-invariant, geometric manner. It is then extended to an evolution resulting from a sequence of measurements as in the work of Pancharatnam and Aharonov and Vardi. Its close connection to the Feynman formulation of quantum mechanics is pointed out. The geometric angles, which are generalizations of the classical, adiabatic angles introduced by Hannay and the quantum, adiabatic angles introduced by Anandan and Stodolsky in their group-theoretic treatment of Berry's phase, are studied in quantum and classical physics. The geometric phase for a quantum spin in a magnetic field due to a second particle is obtained using the quantum reference frame defined by the latter. The question of whether the geometric phase and angles are local or nonlocal and their relationship to the electromagnetic and gravitational phases are also discussed.
The concept of Geometric Phase in Quantum Mechanics is generally formulated en- tirely in terms of geometric structure of complex Hilbert Space. This tutorial article gives a general mathematical overview of the Geometric phase introduced by Berry with the conditions over the system’s evolution embedded through adiabaticity and cyclicity, which were subsequently relaxed sequentially by Aharonov-Anandan, Samuel-Bhandari, and later by Mukunda and Simon by using the idea of Bargmann Invariants. The arti- cle presents a thorough and illustrative overview regarding the mathematical derivation behind the upliftment of the conditions, which results in the generalized definition of the Geometric phase for quantum systems. In addition to that, the article also gives an overall idea about the general analytical aspects of finding the Geometric phase for three level open quantum systems undergoing decoherence and dephasing due to interaction with the surroundings in the weak system reservoir coupling limit described by quantum master equations.
Abstract Geometric phase is a concept of central importance in virtually every branch of physics. In this paper, we show that the evolution time of a cyclically evolving quantum system is restricted by the system’s energy resources and the geometric phase acquired by the state. Specifically, we derive and examine three tight lower bounds on the time required to generate any prescribed Aharonov-Anandan geometric phase. The derivations are based on recent results on the geometric character of the Mandelstam-Tamm and Margolus-Levitin quantum speed limits.