Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Comment on new coherent states with applications to time-dependent systems

M. Schubert, W. Vogel

Published Dec 1, 1983• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

It is shown that the "new class of coherent states" defined by Rajagopal and Marshall is equivalent to the well-known two-photon coherent states.Received 2 February 1983DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.28.3668©1983 American Physical Society

DOI
10.1103/physreva.28.3668

Related papers

Exact solutions to the time-dependent Schrödinger equation

John R. Ray

New exact solutions to the time-dependent Schrödinger equation are presented and the equivalence of two methods of arriving at these solutions shown.Received 12 February 1982DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.26.729©1982 American Physical Society

Physical Review A•Aug 1, 1982•85 citations

Comment on ‘‘Coherent states for the time-dependent harmonic oscillator’’

I. A. Pedrosa

It is shown that the exact coherent states for the time-dependent harmonic oscillator constructed by Hartley and Ray are equivalent to the well-known squeezed states.Received 8 January 1987DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.36.1279©1987 American Physical Society

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Aug 15, 1987•80 citations

Response to "Comment on `Observer dependence of quantum states in relativistic quantum field theories"'

S. Malin

Professor Bloch's criticism is shown to be based on a misunderstanding. The new results contained in the paper he criticized are briefly summarized and their meaning is clarified.Received 5 December 1983DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.29.1856©1984 American Physical Society

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Apr 15, 1984•3 citations

Theorem on coherent transients: Response to a comment

Axel Schenzle, N. C. Wong, Richard G. Brewer

The limits of validity of our previous theorem on coherent transients are discussed with reference to a recent comment.Received 24 November 1980DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.24.2250©1981 American Physical Society

Physical Review A•Oct 1, 1981•7 citations

Note on ‘‘Time dependence of a general class of quantum distribution functions’’

Leon W. Cohen

We show how the general formulation of bilinear distribution functions may be profitably used to study the time dependence of the distribution functions considered by O’Connell, Wang, and Williams.Received 30 May 1986DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.35.433©1987 American Physical Society

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 1987•2 citations

Comment on “Strongly Interacting Photons in a Nonlinear Cavity”

Philippe Grangier, Daniel F. Walls, Klaus M. Gheri

A Comment on the Letter by A. Imamoǧlu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1467 (1997).Received 25 February 1998DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2833©1998 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Sep 28, 1998•77 citations
It is shown that the "new class of coherent states" defined by Rajagopal and Marshall is equivalent to the well-known two-photon coherent states.Received 2 February 1983DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.28.3668©1983 American Physical Society