Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

IFAC Proceedings Volumes

BAYESIAN QUBIT STATE ESTIMATION

Attila Magyar, Dėnes Petz, Katalin Mária Hangos

Published Jan 1, 2006• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.3182/20060329-3-au-2901.00151

Related papers

COMPROMISING NON-DEMOLITION AND INFORMATION GAINING FOR QUBIT STATE ESTIMATION

László Ruppert, Attila Magyar, Katalin Mária Hangos

•Oct 1, 2008•1 citation

Noisy Quantum Measurement of Solid-State Qubits: Bayesian Approach

Alexander N. Korotkov

arXiv:cond-mat/0209629•Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2003•5 citations

ENTANGLEMENT-ASSISTED ESTIMATION OF QUANTUM CHANNELS

Akio Fujiwara

Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of New Technology•Jun 1, 2006•0 citations

STATISTICAL ESTIMATION OF A QUANTUM CHANNEL

Akio Fujiwara

Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of New Technology•Oct 1, 2002•0 citations

Quantum State Estimation

F. De Martini, AND SCIARRINO F., MARCO RICCI

arXiv:1707.03783•Lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2004•822 citations

COMPARISON OF SOME METHODS OF QUANTUM STATE ESTIMATION

Thomas Baier, D�nes Petz, Katalin Mária Hangos +1 more

In the paper the Bayesian and the least squares methods of quantum state tomography are compared for a single qubit. The quality of the estimates are compared by computer simulation when the true state is either mixed or pure. The fidelity and the Hilbert-Schmidt distance are used to quantify the error. It was found that in the regime of low measurement number the Bayesian method outperforms the least squares estimation. Both methods are quite sensitive to the degree of mixedness of the state to be estimated, that is, their performance can be quite bad near pure states.

arXiv:quant-ph/0511263•Quantum Probability and Infinite Dimensional Analysis•Jul 1, 2007•5 citations
In the paper the Bayesian and the least squares methods of quantum state tomography are compared for a single qubit. The quality of the estimates are compared by computer simulation when the true state is either mixed or pure. The fidelity and the Hilbert-Schmidt distance are used to quantify the error. It was found that in the regime of low measurement number the Bayesian method outperforms the least squares estimation. Both methods are quite sensitive to the degree of mixedness of the state to be estimated, that is, their performance can be quite bad near pure states.