Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Theoretical Computer Science

Strict hierarchy among Bell Theorems

Gilles Brassard A, André Allan Méthot

Published Dec 22, 2012• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.tcs.2012.12.011

Related papers

Strict Hierarchy of Bell Theorems

Gilles Brassard A, André Allan Méthot

As proved by John Bell, quantum mechanics exhibits correlations in spacelike separated bipartite systems that are impossible to reproduce by classical means. There are three levels of "Bell theorems", depending on which aspects of the quantum correlations can or cannot be reproduced classically. The original "Bell inequalities" (Bl) require a perfect classical simulation of all quantum probabilities. With "Bell theorems without inequalities" (BTWI), we ask the classical simulation to be able to produce precisely the outputs that could occur according to quantum mechanics, but we do not worry about their exact probabilities. With "pseudo-telepathy" (PT), we are satisfied if the classical simulation produces only outputs allowed by quantum mechanics, but not necessarily all of them. Bell's original proof of Bl involved a maximally entangled 2times2 bipartite state such as the singlet state. Hardy proved that BTWI are possible in dimension 2times2, but his construction used a non-maximally entangled state. Here, we prove that no 2times2 maximally entangled state can serve to produce BTWI. Combining this with the fact that 2times2 entangled states cannot be used at all for the purpose of PT, it follows a strict hierarchy on the quantum resources that are required to exhibit the various levels of Bell theorems.

International Conference on Quantum, Nano and Micro Technologies (ICQNM)•Feb 1, 2008•1 citation

The Scope and Generality of Bell’s Theorem

James Owen Weatherall

arXiv:1212.4854•Foundations of Physics•Aug 22, 2013•2 citations

Faking quantum probabilities: Beyond Bell's theorem and Tsirelson bounds

Marek Czachor, Kamil Nalikowski

Local hidden-variable model of singlet-state correlations discussed in M. Czachor, Arithmetic loophole in Bell's Theorem: Overlooked threat to entangled-state quantum cryptography, Acta Phys. Polon. A 139, 70-83 (2021), is shown to be a particular case of an infinite hierarchy of local hidden-variable models based on an infinite hierarchy of calculi. Violation of Bell-type inequalities is shown to be a `confusion of languages' problem, a result of mixing different but neighboring levels of the hierarchy. Mixing of non-neighboring levels results in violations beyond the Tsirelson bounds.

•May 25, 2021•0 citations

On the logical structure of Bell theorems.

Jonathan Walgate, Anne Broadbent, Hilary A. Carteret +1 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 5, 2007•0 citations

A generalized Bell's theorem

А. В. Белинский

Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics•Apr 1, 1994•2 citations

Classical counterexample to Bell's theorem

Feldmann, Michel

We describe a strictly classical dice game, which emulates the main features of the EPR experiment, including violation of Bell's inequalities. Therefore, the standard interpretation that Bell's theorem provides necessary conditions for `local realism' is disproved.

arXiv:0812.4506•Dec 24, 2008•2 citations
As proved by John Bell, quantum mechanics exhibits correlations in spacelike separated bipartite systems that are impossible to reproduce by classical means. There are three levels of "Bell theorems", depending on which aspects of the quantum correlations can or cannot be reproduced classically. The original "Bell inequalities" (Bl) require a perfect classical simulation of all quantum probabilities. With "Bell theorems without inequalities" (BTWI), we ask the classical simulation to be able to produce precisely the outputs that could occur according to quantum mechanics, but we do not worry about their exact probabilities. With "pseudo-telepathy" (PT), we are satisfied if the classical simulation produces only outputs allowed by quantum mechanics, but not necessarily all of them. Bell's original proof of Bl involved a maximally entangled 2times2 bipartite state such as the singlet state. Hardy proved that BTWI are possible in dimension 2times2, but his construction used a non-maximally entangled state. Here, we prove that no 2times2 maximally entangled state can serve to produce BTWI. Combining this with the fact that 2times2 entangled states cannot be used at all for the purpose of PT, it follows a strict hierarchy on the quantum resources that are required to exhibit the various levels of Bell theorems.
Local hidden-variable model of singlet-state correlations discussed in M. Czachor, Arithmetic loophole in Bell's Theorem: Overlooked threat to entangled-state quantum cryptography, Acta Phys. Polon. A 139, 70-83 (2021), is shown to be a particular case of an infinite hierarchy of local hidden-variable models based on an infinite hierarchy of calculi. Violation of Bell-type inequalities is shown to be a `confusion of languages' problem, a result of mixing different but neighboring levels of the hierarchy. Mixing of non-neighboring levels results in violations beyond the Tsirelson bounds.