Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

Optics. Lectures on Theoretical Physics, Vol. IV

ARNOLD SOMMERFELD, Karl Wilh. Meissner

Published Oct 1, 1955• 79 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1119/1.1934064

Related papers

Fundamentals of Quantum Optics III

Ehlotzky, Fritz

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1993•45 citations

Condensation in the Hard-Sphere Bose Gas

Hiroaki Hara, Hiroshi Ichimura

Progress of Theoretical Physics Vol. 48 No. 6 (1972) pp. 2144-2170 Cluster Expansion for Quantum Gases. IV Hiroaki Hara and Hiroshi Ichimura

Progress of Theoretical Physics•Jun 1, 1971•0 citations

Theoretical and Physical Boundaries of Lattice-Based Post-Quantum Cryptography: An Anatomical Critique of Post-Post-Quantum Taxonomy (Vol-VII)

Syed Muntasir Mamun

This seventh volume of the series establishes the first formal post-post-quantum taxonomy—a three-tier ontological and epistemological hierarchy that reclassifies all post-quantum cryptographic schemes according to the fundamental nature and justification of their security. The hierarchy progresses from computational (algorithmic hardness assumptions) through physical (thermodynamic, noise-engineered, and hardware-constrained irreversibility) to device-independent (information-theoretic guarantees independent of device implementation). Building directly upon the anatomical critiques, hybrid primitives (Vol II), QRAM-hardness (Vol III), parameterized adversary models (Vol IV), GKP-resistant countermeasures (Vol V), and NISQ empirical validation (Vol VI), we provide a complete reclassification of NIST PQC standards, hybrid protocols, and the novel primitives introduced across the series. Dedicated Mamun, SM (2026) ……………………………….1 Theoretical and Physical Boundaries of Lattice-Based Post-Quantum Cryptography: An Anatomical Critique of Post-Post-Quantum Taxonomy (Vol-VII) sections dissect the ontology (what security is) and epistemology (how security claims are known and justified) of each tier. K S C The taxonomy reveals that current lattice-based schemes remain anchored in the provisional computational tier, while the countermeasures developed in Vols III–VI elevate them into the physical tier. True device-independent security remains an aspirational frontier. Also available on Academia.edu: https://www.academia.edu/attachments/132771868/download_file?s=portfolio

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Fundamentals of Quantum Optics II

F. Ehlotzky

Lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 1987•58 citations

D.J. Simms and N.M.J Woodhouse, Lectures on Geometric Quanization, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York, 1976, vi+166ページ, 24.5×16.5cm, 3,200円(Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 53)

不二洋 荒木

日本物理學會誌•Sep 5, 1977•13 citations

QUANTUM OPTICS AND FOUNDATIONS OF PHYSICS

Vladimir B. Braginsky

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Nov 1, 1995•2 citations
This seventh volume of the series establishes the first formal post-post-quantum taxonomy—a three-tier ontological and epistemological hierarchy that reclassifies all post-quantum cryptographic schemes according to the fundamental nature and justification of their security. The hierarchy progresses from computational (algorithmic hardness assumptions) through physical (thermodynamic, noise-engineered, and hardware-constrained irreversibility) to device-independent (information-theoretic guarantees independent of device implementation). Building directly upon the anatomical critiques, hybrid primitives (Vol II), QRAM-hardness (Vol III), parameterized adversary models (Vol IV), GKP-resistant countermeasures (Vol V), and NISQ empirical validation (Vol VI), we provide a complete reclassification of NIST PQC standards, hybrid protocols, and the novel primitives introduced across the series. Dedicated Mamun, SM (2026) ……………………………….1 Theoretical and Physical Boundaries of Lattice-Based Post-Quantum Cryptography: An Anatomical Critique of Post-Post-Quantum Taxonomy (Vol-VII) sections dissect the ontology (what security is) and epistemology (how security claims are known and justified) of each tier. K S C The taxonomy reveals that current lattice-based schemes remain anchored in the provisional computational tier, while the countermeasures developed in Vols III–VI elevate them into the physical tier. True device-independent security remains an aspirational frontier. Also available on Academia.edu: https://www.academia.edu/attachments/132771868/download_file?s=portfolio