Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

Wavelets, windows, and photons

D. Han, Y.S. Kim, Marilyn E. Noz

Published Oct 1, 1995• 10 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Within the wavelet framework, it is shown that it is possible to construct a Lorentz-covariant superposition of light waves. The concept of window allows the definition of a “finite difference” between wavelets and photons. It is pointed out that a windowed function is as accurate as any continuous function which may be constructed from a discrete set of experimental data.

DOI
10.1016/0375-9601(95)00634-f

Related papers

Wavelets and spacetime squeeze

D. Han, Y. S. Kim, Marilyn E. Noz

It is shown that the wavelet is the natural language for the Lorentz covariant description of localized light waves. A model for covariant superposition is constructed for light waves with different frequencies. It is therefore possible to construct a wave function for light waves carrying a covariant probability interpretation. It is shown that the time-energy uncertainty relation (Delta(t))(Delta(w)) is approximately 1 for light waves is a Lorentz-invariant relation. The connection between photons and localized light waves is examined critically.

•Jan 1, 1993•0 citations

A new approach to the photon localization problem

D. Han, Y. S. Kim, Marilyn E. Noz

Since wavelets form a representation of the Poincare group, it is possible to construct a localized superposition of light waves with different frequencies in a Lorentz-covariant manner. This localized wavelet satisfies a Lorentz-invariant uncertainty relation, and also the Lorentz-invariant Parseval's relation. A quantitative analysis is given for the difference between photons and localized waves. It is then shown that this localized entity corresponds to a relativistic photon with a sharply defined momentum in the non-localization limit. Waves are not particles. It is confirmed that the wave-particle duality is subject to the uncertainty principle.

•May 1, 1994•0 citations

Uncertainty relations for light waves and the concept of photons

D. Han, Y. S. Kim, Marilyn E. Noz

A Lorentz-covariant localization for light waves is presented. The unitary representation for the electromagnetic four-potential is constructed for a monochromatic light wave. A model for covariant superposition is constructed for light waves with different frequencies. It is therefore possible to construct a wave function for light waves carrying a covariant probability interpretation. It is shown that the time-energy uncertainty relation (\ensuremath{\Delta}t)(\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\omega})\ensuremath{\simeq}1 for light waves is a Lorentz-invariant relation. The connection between photons and localized light waves is examined critically.

Physical Review A•Feb 1, 1987•19 citations

Higher-dimensional wavelets

Jean-Pierre Antoine, Romain Murenzi, Pierre Vandergheynst +1 more

In the previous chapters, we have thoroughly discussed the 2-D CWT and some of its applications. Then we have made the connection with the group theoretical origins of the method, thus establishing a general framework, based on the coherent state formalism. In the present chapter, we will apply the same technique to a number of different situations involving higher dimensions: wavelets in 3-D space ℝ 3 , wavelets in ℝ n ( n > 3), and wavelets on the 2-sphere S 2 . Then, in the next chapter, we will treat time-dependent wavelets, that is, wavelets on space–time, designed for motion analysis. In all cases, the technique is the same. First one identifies the manifold on which the signals are defined and the appropriate group of transformations acting on the latter. Next one chooses a square integrable representation of that group, possibly modulo some subgroup. Then one constructs wavelets as admissible vectors and derives the corresponding wavelet transform. Three-dimensional wavelets Some physical phenomena are intrinsically multiscale and three-dimensional. Typical examples may be found in fluid dynamics, for instance the appearance of coherent structures in turbulent flows, or the disentangling of a wave train in (mostly underwater) acoustics, as discussed above. In such cases, a 3-D wavelet analysis is clearly more adequate and likely to yield a deeper understanding [56].

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 23, 2004•0 citations

A Lorentz Invariant Schrödinger Equation for Spin 0

E. Trübenbacher

Abstract Using the concept of distributions, the square root of the operator - Δ + m2 is taken in a mathematically well defined way for one component wave functions. A new representation of proper Lorentz transformations for one component wave functions makes it possible to construct a relativistic quantum mechanics for spin 0, comprising a Lorentz invariant wave equation, a scalar product, and a positive definite density satisfying, together with a current, a continuity equation, and coupling of scalar and vector potentials. Some interesting consequences of the theory concerning the concept of particle trajectory and velocity of propagation of the probability amplitude are discussed in detail. As an example of practical application a perturbation theory for discrete states is set up.

Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A•Sep 1, 1989•0 citations

Wavelets as q-bits and q-bit states as wavelets

Pawel Steblinski, Tomasz Błachowicz

In this short report it is argued that by the use of wavelets formalism it is possible to describe the q-bit state. The wavelet formalism address the real-valued physical signals, for example, obtained during typical physical measurements.

arXiv:0911.1993•Nov 11, 2009•0 citations
Within the wavelet framework, it is shown that it is possible to construct a Lorentz-covariant superposition of light waves. The concept of window allows the definition of a “finite difference” between wavelets and photons. It is pointed out that a windowed function is as accurate as any continuous function which may be constructed from a discrete set of experimental data.
It is shown that the wavelet is the natural language for the Lorentz covariant description of localized light waves. A model for covariant superposition is constructed for light waves with different frequencies. It is therefore possible to construct a wave function for light waves carrying a covariant probability interpretation. It is shown that the time-energy uncertainty relation (Delta(t))(Delta(w)) is approximately 1 for light waves is a Lorentz-invariant relation. The connection between photons and localized light waves is examined critically.
Since wavelets form a representation of the Poincare group, it is possible to construct a localized superposition of light waves with different frequencies in a Lorentz-covariant manner. This localized wavelet satisfies a Lorentz-invariant uncertainty relation, and also the Lorentz-invariant Parseval's relation. A quantitative analysis is given for the difference between photons and localized waves. It is then shown that this localized entity corresponds to a relativistic photon with a sharply defined momentum in the non-localization limit. Waves are not particles. It is confirmed that the wave-particle duality is subject to the uncertainty principle.
A Lorentz-covariant localization for light waves is presented. The unitary representation for the electromagnetic four-potential is constructed for a monochromatic light wave. A model for covariant superposition is constructed for light waves with different frequencies. It is therefore possible to construct a wave function for light waves carrying a covariant probability interpretation. It is shown that the time-energy uncertainty relation (\ensuremath{\Delta}t)(\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\omega})\ensuremath{\simeq}1 for light waves is a Lorentz-invariant relation. The connection between photons and localized light waves is examined critically.
In the previous chapters, we have thoroughly discussed the 2-D CWT and some of its applications. Then we have made the connection with the group theoretical origins of the method, thus establishing a general framework, based on the coherent state formalism. In the present chapter, we will apply the same technique to a number of different situations involving higher dimensions: wavelets in 3-D space ℝ 3 , wavelets in ℝ n ( n > 3), and wavelets on the 2-sphere S 2 . Then, in the next chapter, we will treat time-dependent wavelets, that is, wavelets on space–time, designed for motion analysis. In all cases, the technique is the same. First one identifies the manifold on which the signals are defined and the appropriate group of transformations acting on the latter. Next one chooses a square integrable representation of that group, possibly modulo some subgroup. Then one constructs wavelets as admissible vectors and derives the corresponding wavelet transform. Three-dimensional wavelets Some physical phenomena are intrinsically multiscale and three-dimensional. Typical examples may be found in fluid dynamics, for instance the appearance of coherent structures in turbulent flows, or the disentangling of a wave train in (mostly underwater) acoustics, as discussed above. In such cases, a 3-D wavelet analysis is clearly more adequate and likely to yield a deeper understanding [56].
Abstract Using the concept of distributions, the square root of the operator - Δ + m2 is taken in a mathematically well defined way for one component wave functions. A new representation of proper Lorentz transformations for one component wave functions makes it possible to construct a relativistic quantum mechanics for spin 0, comprising a Lorentz invariant wave equation, a scalar product, and a positive definite density satisfying, together with a current, a continuity equation, and coupling of scalar and vector potentials. Some interesting consequences of the theory concerning the concept of particle trajectory and velocity of propagation of the probability amplitude are discussed in detail. As an example of practical application a perturbation theory for discrete states is set up.