It is proposed that counting experiments in quantum physics should be analyzed in terms of point processes (QPP) defined in the framework of quantum probability theory. A coincidence approach is developed for a class QPP called the regular QPP. A counting formula is derived which determines completely the counting statistics of a regular QPP by means of a pair of ’’generators.’’
It is proposed that counting experiments in quantum physics should be analyzed in terms of point processes (QPP) defined in the framework of quantum probability theory. A coincidence approach is developed for a class QPP called the regular QPP. A counting formula is derived which determines completely the counting statistics of a regular QPP by means of a pair of ’’generators.’’
A definition of quantum particle detection point processes is given for normal and locally normal systems. This is realized by building coincidence measurement operators, describing in a thoroughly quantum formalism the coincidence experiments that have been actually performed (photon) or that might be performed (electron, neutron). The quantum mean values of these coincidence operators are shown to be the coincidence probabilities of a mathematically well−defined regular process. Some applications of the latter result are given, in particular in the case of fermion point processes.
Quantum mechanics has several deficiencies as a complete theoretical description of the measurement process. Among them is the fact that the quantum mechanical description of correlations between the single measurements of a sequence is quite problematic. A single measurement is defined to be a preparation followed by an observation. In particular, one feels that an infinite sequence of such single measurements which corresponds to the measurement of a question O on a state η where η does not lie entirely in an eigenspace of O should generate a random output sequence. However, quantum mechanics seems to say nothing about this. In this paper, physical theories are defined in such a manner that correlations between single measurements are explicitly included. In particular, a physical theory is considered to be a mapping U, with domain in the set [Qsτ] of infinite instruction strings for carrying out infinite sequences of single measurements and range in the set of probability measures defined on A, the usual σ algebra of subsets of Ω. Ω is the set of all infinite sequences of natural numbers. A fundamental property which any valid physical theory must satisfy is that it agrees with experiment. It is proposed and discussed here that much of the intuitive meaning of agreement between a theory U and experiment with respect to H is given by the statement ∀Qsτ [U(Qsτ) defined⇒E(H,U(Qsτ),ψQsτ)],where U(Qsτ) is the probability measure U associates with the infinite instruction string Qsτ and ψQsτ is the outcome sequence obtained by carrying out Qsτ. E(H, U(Qsτ),ψQsτ) is the statement that all formulas in H with one free sequence variable which are true on Ω almost everywhere with respect to U(Qsτ) are true for ψQsτ. H is a subclass of the class of all formulas in a formal language L. A theorem is proved which states that, if U(Qsτ) corresponds to a nontrivial product probability measure and U H-agrees with experiment, then the outcome sequence ψQsτ is H-random. H-randomness is defined here in terms of the statement E(H, P, φ). Another property of a valid physical theory, which is defined here, is that, for some Qsτ, U(Qsτ) must be determinable on much of AH from ψQsτ. Sufficient conditions for this property to hold are given. AH is the class of all H definable subsets of Ω. Some properties of the statement E(H, P, φ) are given. Among other things, it is proved that, if E(H, P, φ) holds and P is a nontrivial probability measure on A, then φ is not definable in H.
Given an unknown quantum state described by one of two possible density operators, the Helstrom bound provides the minimum discrimination error probability (DEP) by optimizing over all possible quantum measurements. However, it is unrealistic to implement arbitrary measurements in practice due to physical limitations of measurement apparatuses. This paper considers a quantum state discrimination scenario where a fixed measurement apparatus is available. In this setting, we advocate the use of quantum pre-processing (QPP) to realize effectively different measurements from that of the fixed apparatus. Applying optimal QPP prior to measurement with the fixed apparatus allows one to minimize the DEP. This paper derives the minimum DEP, determines the QPP required to achieve it, and provides necessary and sufficient conditions for this minimum DEP with optimal QPP to coincide with the Helstrom bound.
Interest in problems of statistical inference connected to measurements of quantum systems has recently increased substantially, in step with dramatic new developments in experimental techniques for studying small quantum systems. Furthermore, theoretical developments in the theory of quantum measurements have brought the basic mathematical framework for the probability calculations much closer to that of classical probability theory. The present paper reviews this field and proposes and interrelates a number of new concepts for an extension of classical statistical inference to the quantum context.
We reconsider various approaches to the quantum theory of photodetection from the point of view of the quantum theory of measurement, and show that important differences between them depend upon the manner in which they take into account the modification of the field distribution produced by the presence of the detector. We show that the Mandel photon counting formula may lead to unphysical results, such as negative probabilities, in some situations just because this modification is not incorporated into the model. We also show that the recently developed quantum theory of continuous measurements provides a completely satisfactory framework for discussing photon counting experiments. As an illustration, an exact derivation of the photon statistics of a single-mode free field is presented, and some of the results are shown to be identical to those derived earlier by Mollow and others. We also indicate how our approach can be extended to discuss the photon statistics of fields in interaction with sources and reservoirs.
We propose a versatile privacy framework for quantum systems, termedquantum pufferfish privacy(QPP). Inspired by classical pufferfish privacy, our formulation generalizes and addresses limitations of quantum differential privacy by offering flexibility in specifying private information, feasible measurements, and domain knowledge. We show that QPP can be equivalently formulated in terms of the Datta–Leditzky information spectrum divergence, thus providing the first operational interpretation thereof. We reformulate this divergence as a semi-definite program and derive several properties of it, which are then used to prove convexity, composability, and post-processing of QPP mechanisms. Parameters that guarantee QPP of the depolarization mechanism are also derived. We analyze the privacy-utility tradeoff of general QPP mechanisms and, again, study the depolarization mechanism as an explicit instance. The QPP framework is then applied to privacy auditing for identifying privacy violations via a hypothesis testing pipeline that leverages quantum algorithms. Connections to quantum fairness and other quantum divergences are also explored and several variants of QPP are examined.