Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Observation of Stable Superfluid Circulation in Liquid-Helium II at the Level of One, Two, and Three Quantum Units

S. C. Whitmore, William Zimmermann

Published Aug 30, 1965• 39 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.15.389

Related papers

The Observation and Measurement of Quantized Circulation in Superfluid HELIUM-3

J. D. Close

•Jan 1, 1991•0 citations

Sound-Modulated Flow of Superfluid Helium through a Small Orifice: An Attempt to Observe the ac Josephson Effect

P. Leǐderer, Frank Pobell

Two chambers filled with superfluid helium to different levels were connected by a small orifice (10-15 \ensuremath{\mu}m). The flow of the liquid through the orifice was modulated by a sound field. With one experimental apparatus only a continuous flow was observed. With a modified apparatus it was possible to obtain stable states with no net flow at finite level differences between the baths. The spacing between these states is inversely proportional to the sound frequency. It depends on the total height of the liquid in one of the baths and not on the level difference between them. We conclude that the stable states of zero flow result from ultrasonic standing waves of the superfluid in one of the chambers. A phase coupling or Josephson effect can be excluded as an explanation for these states.

Physical Review A•Mar 1, 1973•17 citations

Superfluidity

Ivo Sachs, Siddhartha Sen, James Sexton

The goal of this chapter will be to briefly describe the remarkable properties of helium at low temperatures. After stating some of these properties we will see how they can be understood in terms of the phenomenon of Bose–Einstein condensation described in Chapter 7. We will give the main argument in two different formulations, once using the quasi-particle method of Bogoliubov, and then using a Green function approach. We start with some experimental facts. Helium is a remarkable element. It was predicted to exist from observations of the Sun before it was found on Earth. It is the only element which remains a liquid at zero temperature and atmospheric pressure. Experimentally the phase diagram of 4 He is shown in Figure 10.1. Helium I is a normal fluid and has a normal gas-liquid critical point. Helium II is a mixture of a normal fluid and a superfluid. The superfluid is characterized by the vanishing of its viscosity. Helium I and helium II are separated by a line known as the λ -transition line. At T λ = 2.18 K, P λ = 2.29 Pa, helium I, helium II, and helium gas coexist. The specific heat of liquid helium along the vapor transition line forms a logarithmic discontinuity shown in Figure 10.2. The form of this diagram resembles the Greek letter λ and is the reason for calling the transition a λ -transition. The lack of viscosity of helium II leads to some remarkable experimental consequences, one of which we briefly describe. Let two containers A and B be linked by a thin capillary through which only a fluid with zero (or very low) viscosity can pass freely.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•May 11, 2006•0 citations

Phase Coherence and Quantized-Circulation Transitions in Superfluid helium

D. F. Brewer

Physical Review Letters•Aug 18, 1986•4 citations

Stable circulation in superfluid3He-A

Rena J. Zieve, Yu. M. Mukharsky, J. D. Close +2 more

Journal of Low Temperature Physics•Oct 1, 1992•1 citation

Vortex States

David Reginald Tilley, John Tilley

In superconductors, as in Helium II (He II), the holes round which quantisation occurs can be either physical boundaries, or the cores of quantised vortex lines. For convenience we summarise here the resemblances and differences between vortex lines and vortex states in He II and in superconductors. In contrast, states in which a whole vortex is attached to the wire should be comparatively stable. The rotation of the superfluid can be satisfactorily explained by assuming that it is threaded by a series of parallel straight vortex lines. Consider a single straight vortex line in the superfluid. The energy associated with a single vortex line is mainly the kinetic energy of the circulating superfluid. The number and separation of vortex lines present for a given angular velocity clearly depends on their individual circulations. Two rival models for the ion-vortex transition have been proposed, generally known as the peeling model and the quantum transition model.

Routledge eBooks•Jul 9, 2019•0 citations
Two chambers filled with superfluid helium to different levels were connected by a small orifice (10-15 \ensuremath{\mu}m). The flow of the liquid through the orifice was modulated by a sound field. With one experimental apparatus only a continuous flow was observed. With a modified apparatus it was possible to obtain stable states with no net flow at finite level differences between the baths. The spacing between these states is inversely proportional to the sound frequency. It depends on the total height of the liquid in one of the baths and not on the level difference between them. We conclude that the stable states of zero flow result from ultrasonic standing waves of the superfluid in one of the chambers. A phase coupling or Josephson effect can be excluded as an explanation for these states.
The goal of this chapter will be to briefly describe the remarkable properties of helium at low temperatures. After stating some of these properties we will see how they can be understood in terms of the phenomenon of Bose–Einstein condensation described in Chapter 7. We will give the main argument in two different formulations, once using the quasi-particle method of Bogoliubov, and then using a Green function approach. We start with some experimental facts. Helium is a remarkable element. It was predicted to exist from observations of the Sun before it was found on Earth. It is the only element which remains a liquid at zero temperature and atmospheric pressure. Experimentally the phase diagram of 4 He is shown in Figure 10.1. Helium I is a normal fluid and has a normal gas-liquid critical point. Helium II is a mixture of a normal fluid and a superfluid. The superfluid is characterized by the vanishing of its viscosity. Helium I and helium II are separated by a line known as the λ -transition line. At T λ = 2.18 K, P λ = 2.29 Pa, helium I, helium II, and helium gas coexist. The specific heat of liquid helium along the vapor transition line forms a logarithmic discontinuity shown in Figure 10.2. The form of this diagram resembles the Greek letter λ and is the reason for calling the transition a λ -transition. The lack of viscosity of helium II leads to some remarkable experimental consequences, one of which we briefly describe. Let two containers A and B be linked by a thin capillary through which only a fluid with zero (or very low) viscosity can pass freely.
In superconductors, as in Helium II (He II), the holes round which quantisation occurs can be either physical boundaries, or the cores of quantised vortex lines. For convenience we summarise here the resemblances and differences between vortex lines and vortex states in He II and in superconductors. In contrast, states in which a whole vortex is attached to the wire should be comparatively stable. The rotation of the superfluid can be satisfactorily explained by assuming that it is threaded by a series of parallel straight vortex lines. Consider a single straight vortex line in the superfluid. The energy associated with a single vortex line is mainly the kinetic energy of the circulating superfluid. The number and separation of vortex lines present for a given angular velocity clearly depends on their individual circulations. Two rival models for the ion-vortex transition have been proposed, generally known as the peeling model and the quantum transition model.