American Journal of Physics

The real scandal of quantum mechanics

R. C. Henry

Published Sep 18, 2009• 5 citations

Abstract

See also companion Response to “The real scandal of quantum mechanics,” by Richard Conn Henry [Am. J. Phys. 77 (10), 869–870 (2009)]

DOI: 10.1119/1.3130927

Related papers

Response to “The real scandal of quantum mechanics,” by Richard Conn Henry [Am. J. Phys. 77 (10), 869–870 (2009)]

Art Hobson

American Journal of PhysicsSep 18, 20093 citations

Response to “The scandal of quantum mechanics,” by N. G. van Kampen [Am. J. Phys. 76, 989–990 (2008)]

Art Hobson

American Journal of PhysicsMar 16, 20096 citations

The scandal of quantum mechanics

N. G. van Kampen

American Journal of PhysicsOct 14, 200835 citations

The Locality Scandal of Quantum Mechanics

Frederik Müller

Springer eBooksJan 1, 19995 citations

Science Miseducation in A Private Universe

Michael Riordan

Riordan replies: The question of what is “real” has been debated—and will continue to be debated—by philosophers for centuries. If nothing is real except for observations, as Richard Henry states in his last sentence, then quantum mechanics itself must not be real or true. Therefore, his strict empiricist conclusion rests on very shaky ground.© 2004 American Institute of Physics.

Physics TodayFeb 1, 20040 citations

The “Paradoxes” of Quantum Mechanics

CHRISTOF WETTERICH

Fundamental theories of physicsJan 1, 20250 citations