Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Chaos Solitons & Fractals

Quantum Analog Computing

Michail A. Zak

Published Sep 1, 1999• 19 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/s0960-0779(98)00215-x

Related papers

Digital-Analog Quantum Computing

Asier Galicia Martínez

•Jan 16, 2020•0 citations

Quantum computing with analog circuits: Hilbert space computing

László B. Kish

We first point out the practical difficulties of universal quantum computing which may prohibit practical applications as universal computers. Then we show how to apply analog microelectronic circuits to realize the architecture, data processing and parallel computing abilities of quantum computing via Hilbert space computing with analog circuits. Such a Hilbert-space-analog (HSA) computer simulates the Hilbert space and its operators and it is able to use and test quantum algorithms developed for the real quantum computers. Such a computer would be free of most of the practical difficulties of realizing and running a real quantum computer. This computer can be made universal. It is remarkable that by using the same numbers of transistors as in today's PCs, such a HSA computer can manipulate ~107 analog numbers corresponding to ~23 qubits, simultaneously, by quantum-parallel processing.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Jul 24, 2003•13 citations

Digital-Analog Quantum Computing

Mikel Sanz

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 8, 2019•2 citations

Hilbert space computing by analog circuits

László B. Kish

We show that, if time comes when quantum algorithms can be used for universal parallel computation, the "quantum-parallel" computer hardware will most probably be a classical physical system corresponding to a Hilbert space and the actual realization may be the combination of analog and digital circuits. We first point out the practical difficulties of universal quantum computing which may prohibit practical applications as universal computers. Then we show how to apply analog microelectronic circuits to realize the architecture, data processing and parallel computing abilities of quantum computing via Hilbert space computing with analog circuits. Such a Hilbert-space-analog (HSA) computer simulates the Hilbert space and its operators, and it is able to use and test quantum algorithms developed for the real quantum computers. Such a computer would be free of most of the practical difficulties of realizing and running a real quantum computer. This computer can be made universal. It is remarkable that by using the same numbers of transistors as in today's PCs, such a HSA computer can manipulate ~107 analog numbers corresponding to ~22 qubits, simultaneously, by quantum-parallel processing.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•May 9, 2003•3 citations

Mitigating noise in digital and digital–analog quantum computation

Paula García-Molina, Ana Martin, Mikel Garcia de Andoin +1 more

Abstract Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices lack error correction, limiting scalability for quantum algorithms. In this context, digital-analog quantum computing (DAQC) offers a more resilient alternative quantum computing paradigm that outperforms digital quantum computation by combining the flexibility of single-qubit gates with the robustness of analog simulations. This work explores the impact of noise on both digital and DAQC paradigms and demonstrates DAQC’s effectiveness in error mitigation. We compare the quantum Fourier transform and quantum phase estimation algorithms under a wide range of single and two-qubit noise sources in superconducting processors. DAQC consistently surpasses digital approaches in fidelity, particularly as processor size increases. Moreover, zero-noise extrapolation further enhances DAQC by mitigating decoherence and intrinsic errors, achieving fidelities above 0.95 for 8 qubits, and reducing computation errors to the order of 10 −3 . These results establish DAQC as a viable alternative for quantum computing in the NISQ era.

arXiv:2107.12969•Communications Physics•Oct 6, 2024•19 citations

Quantum computation

North-Holland mathematics studies•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations
We first point out the practical difficulties of universal quantum computing which may prohibit practical applications as universal computers. Then we show how to apply analog microelectronic circuits to realize the architecture, data processing and parallel computing abilities of quantum computing via Hilbert space computing with analog circuits. Such a Hilbert-space-analog (HSA) computer simulates the Hilbert space and its operators and it is able to use and test quantum algorithms developed for the real quantum computers. Such a computer would be free of most of the practical difficulties of realizing and running a real quantum computer. This computer can be made universal. It is remarkable that by using the same numbers of transistors as in today's PCs, such a HSA computer can manipulate ~107 analog numbers corresponding to ~23 qubits, simultaneously, by quantum-parallel processing.
We show that, if time comes when quantum algorithms can be used for universal parallel computation, the "quantum-parallel" computer hardware will most probably be a classical physical system corresponding to a Hilbert space and the actual realization may be the combination of analog and digital circuits. We first point out the practical difficulties of universal quantum computing which may prohibit practical applications as universal computers. Then we show how to apply analog microelectronic circuits to realize the architecture, data processing and parallel computing abilities of quantum computing via Hilbert space computing with analog circuits. Such a Hilbert-space-analog (HSA) computer simulates the Hilbert space and its operators, and it is able to use and test quantum algorithms developed for the real quantum computers. Such a computer would be free of most of the practical difficulties of realizing and running a real quantum computer. This computer can be made universal. It is remarkable that by using the same numbers of transistors as in today's PCs, such a HSA computer can manipulate ~107 analog numbers corresponding to ~22 qubits, simultaneously, by quantum-parallel processing.
Abstract Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices lack error correction, limiting scalability for quantum algorithms. In this context, digital-analog quantum computing (DAQC) offers a more resilient alternative quantum computing paradigm that outperforms digital quantum computation by combining the flexibility of single-qubit gates with the robustness of analog simulations. This work explores the impact of noise on both digital and DAQC paradigms and demonstrates DAQC’s effectiveness in error mitigation. We compare the quantum Fourier transform and quantum phase estimation algorithms under a wide range of single and two-qubit noise sources in superconducting processors. DAQC consistently surpasses digital approaches in fidelity, particularly as processor size increases. Moreover, zero-noise extrapolation further enhances DAQC by mitigating decoherence and intrinsic errors, achieving fidelities above 0.95 for 8 qubits, and reducing computation errors to the order of 10 −3 . These results establish DAQC as a viable alternative for quantum computing in the NISQ era.